Pakistan judicial system always amazes me ...

From DAWN: Blasphemy cannot be attributed to Muslims: LHC orders release of convict

LAHORE, Oct 16: A division bench of the Lahore High Court has ruled that blasphemy cannot be attributed to a Muslim. Comprising Justice Ali Nawaz Chohan and Justice Rustam Ali Malik , the bench gave the ruling while accepting the appeal of Muhammad Mehboob of Khushab against his conviction in a blasphemy case by an anti-terrorism court.

He was sentenced to death, rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of Rs50,000 on charges of pasting posters containing sacrilegious remarks on the walls of a mosque in Khushab.

Disposing of the appeal and ordering the release of the appellant, the judges observed in their judgment that “in case a Muslim commits the offence of blasphemy under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code it will amount to apostasy and he becomes a apostate murtad (a person who repudiates Islam after embracing it).

The appeal was accepted because the appellant denied the allegations and pointed out that those who had accused him of blasphemy belonged to another religious sect. Moreover, the evidence of the general public had not been recorded in the case and the police had fabricated evidence by procuring markers from the bazaar. The investigation had been conducted by an ASI having no elaborate religious knowledge.

The learned judges directed the Inspector General of Police, Punjab, to ensure that an investigation of a blasphemy case is entrusted to a team of at least two gazetted investigation officers preferably conversant with Islamic jurisprudence. In case the officers are not conversant with Islamic law a scholar of repute and integrity might be included in the team.

The police should proceed in the matter only if the investigating team finds the accused guilty of blasphemy. The trial of a blasphemy case should be held by a court presided over by a judicial officer not below the rank of a district and sessions judge.

I don’t know how they came up with the “judgment” in bold, can someone explain? From what I understand they are saying that if someone commits blasphemy he becomes a non-Muslim? And if it does … then … don’t punish him?

ahmedjee, pakistani jurists are the ones that came up with the "doctrine of necessity" that has allowed the army to step in when ever they chose with impunity. I read an article a few years back where international jusrists were marvelling at that original ruling by Justice Munir, and how that went against any notion of constitutional law. So I guess the Law in Pakistan is whatever those in Power say it is.
But more to the particular language you have highlighted, I am utterly baffled because that does not make any sense to me no matter how you look at it.

It implies that a muslim can committ the most egregious blasphemy, get declared a murtid and then agree to become a muslim within the normal three day period and escape any punishment whatsoever! Does not make sense!

Ahmadjee Bhaijan, what is so amazing about it? What amazes me is that with 70% illiteracy rate the country can even have a legal system in place. What the nation needs is more Punchayat style legal system where punishment is swift and the effect is lasting.

We should be stoning everyone, from parking violaters to jay walkers…:k: