Pakistan is not in competition with India

Indians and Pakistanis are going in different directions. Musharraf wants Pakistanis not to be India-Centric.

http://www.dawn.com/2006/03/07/top1.htm

RAWALPINDI, March 6: President Gen Pervez Musharraf has said Pakistan is focused on improving its economy and alleviating poverty and eradicating terrorism from its soil and is not interested in joining a “numerical arms race” with India.

**
“We are pursuing our national interests as other countries do. We are not in competition with India. India has global and regional aspirations. We do not have such aspirations. Our aspirations are defensive. We want to create jobs, reduce poverty,” he told senior media persons of the country invited to his Camp Office in Rawalpindi following the visit of US President George Bush to the region.

President Musharraf described the results flowing from Mr Bush’s weekend visit to Islamabad as “positive”. Pakistan-US relations were institutionalized, broad-based, long-term and multifaceted, he said, advising his countrymen to stop being India-centric.

“They (the Indians) are going in a different direction and we are going in a different direction,” he explained.
**
He agreed when reminded that it was the Pakistani army and the foreign office, which had drummed these India-centric ideas in the minds of Pakistanis over the last 60 years. He felt the government, the foreign office, the political leadership and the media should try to remove this India fixation, but added with a smile:” The army will still remain India-centric for obvious reasons.”

N-PROGRAMME: Discussing specifically Pakistan’s nuclear programme, the president said Pakistan did not need any cooperation from outside for advancing the programme; “it is on and it will go on.”

He said he was willing to buy F-16s if they came under the EAD concessional facility of Non-Nato Alliance arrangement. Otherwise, it would be in the self-interest of Pakistan to spend the money on social sectors to reduce poverty, and spread educational and health facilities.

“How much should we spend on defence? We do not want to spend more on F-16s. We are a poor country. We want to strengthen our economy and alleviate poverty,” he said.

There were other cost effective options as well and other sources for acquiring such weapons systems, he said. One option is the $600 million assistance from the US, half of which is for defence purchases.

He assured the nation that the lethality and the accuracy of the weapons system, which Pakistan already possesses and plans to acquire in the near future, were more than enough to maintain an effective minimum deterrence level and “if at all at some future date, some gaps emerged then we will move quickly to fill them.”

KASHIR ISSUE: He said he was in contact with the US on Kashmir even before the US President’s visit and that Pakistan expected Washington to continue to play the role of a facilitator. “We will have to tackle and resolve the issue at the bilateral level.”

President Musharraf appeared hopeful of progress on his four-point proposal on resolving the Kashmir conflict as he said he saw some discussions going on the self-governance issue. His four-point included: 1. Identify Kashmir as a problem, 2. Demilitarization, 3.Self-governance and 4. Joint management.

He said he did not know why Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had not come to Pakistan so far, “but I would also like to see some substantive progress made when and if such a visit takes place”.

ENERGY NEEDS: He said the US had promised to look into Pakistan’s energy needs and strengthen a broad range of options. “We need energy, we need gas, we need hydroelectricity and we need to add massively to our present energy capacities by 2008-10. The US recognizes this. We are getting one more 300mw nuclear power plant from China. We need a 1000mw nuclear power plant from the US.”

DR KHAN: He said some problems linked to Dr. A.Q. Khan still stood in the way. “Every time a new aspect of the clandestine trade comes to the fore, they come asking why the doctor did not reveal it earlier. And there are two more doctors, Dr Jaffery and Dr Farooq, whom the US wants to interrogate. We will not hand them over to anybody .We will question them using our own methodology and if they (the US) have any questions they can send them to us.”

TRILATERAL GAS PIPELINE: Discussing the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline, the president said that no one (from the US) had ever asked him about this project and referred President Bush’s remarks on the subject at the press conference in which he very clearly said the US had objections to Iran’s nuclear ambitions and not to any other matter.

Since it was a trilateral project, there would be delays in taking the project in hand. “But if the delays are inordinate, we would make it a bilateral project,” he said.

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

[quote]
Musharraf wants Pakistanis not to be India-Centric.

[/quote]

And you believe him?

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

sadly pakisan wi always be influenced by india and afghanistan. as long as kashmir remains a dispute itw il always be so too.

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

on thing .. Mr Bush goes to India to talk about economic issues along with nuclear deals etc(which i dont have any problem with)..

BUT.. a similar country with same sorta demographics.. but mr Bush talks about how to eradicate terrorism and find uncle laden. Thats totally ludicrous and our chacha musharraf needs to grow up and stop licking americas's feet.... Just look at Iran..

Sure we need more development then now in pakistan and & I am all for it, but certain things (like religion and poversty) have to have a reform before anything major can happen..

One thing that has helped India so much is their Sikh PM who is an EX-economist---knows how to work the money..

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

Pakistan is not in competition with India. But judging by the attitude of my Indian friends here, India does see herself in some sort of competition against Pakistan.

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

India and Pakistan should work together and eradicate serious economic health and communal problems rather than being at logger heads. India has made significant strides and Pakistan under Musharaf has made some. That's not enough.

Why do some people say India is competing with Pakistan? I don't think so. Size, economic activity, demographics and global posture are completely different, not to mention stability and system of government.

6 decades of confrontation hasn't achieved anything other than loss of life and wasted resources; try coperation for a change

If only Pakistan will realize the benefits of working together - for example, as skilled export oriented work becomes more expensive in India, Pakistan could provide a natural buffer, if only they'll work with the Indian schools and companies. They could allow India unrestricted access to Afganistan for trade and in the process build a strong 3 way partnership. By working together with India, they can make the pipeline economics feasible. By working together with India, they could allow the estranged families become closer.

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

^ If only what you said can be translated into real actions by the S. Asian "big brother"!

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

Real action can be done.. by us .. the people of pakistan..
by electing a responsible government rather than supporting a dictator.

Re: Pakistan is not in competition with India

yup

and sizing the power of the religious factions down significantly. these guys get funded by the Saudis and thumb their nose at the local law