Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Razors, crocodiles and opium

                                                       Pakistan out-played England from start to finish in the third Test. Their excellence has been thoroughly overlooked

Mohammad Amir and Umar Akmal walk off the pitch after Pakistan’s victory in the third Test. Photograph: Andrew Couldridge/Action Images

OVERLOOKING THE OBVIOUS

Occam’s razor would be as blunt as a pair of plastic scissors by the time we were done cutting through the morass of theories about what is wrong with England’s batsmen. Technique or temperament? Is Alastair Cook’s front leg too straight? Does Kevin Pietersen play too loose too soon? Is the captaincy getting to Andrew Strauss? Does Stuart Broad need more batting practice?
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem” was how Occam put it, but in the age of Sky Sports News that seems just a touch too fancy-dan, so in keeping with the original principle we’ll just say that the simplest explanation is the best. The razor cuts through a lot things, but mustard is not among them. At least not so long as there are editors, producers and pundits who need to fill the airwaves, print pages and computer screens with opinion and analysis.

If you want a reason why England have mustered more than 300 runs in an innings only once in so far in this series, try this one – Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket. In fact if Pakistan’s fielders had caught the ball as well at Trent Bridge and Edgbaston as they did at the Oval, then England would not have passed 300 at all, and could very easily be losing the series.

Perhaps the England team and their fans grew fat on the home and away series against Bangladesh and became obsessed with watching their own waistlines. They forgot that not every error in cricket is self-induced, nor every defeat due only to the loser’s ineptitude. Pakistan out-played England from start to finish in the third Test. Their excellence has been overlooked. Given the circumstances, it must rank as one of the most remarkable team performances of the year. Forget about the Ashes. The wider context of this tour is the awful fact that while Pakistan have been in this country one of the worst humanitarian crises in modern history has been developing in their homeland, “the slow-motion tsunami” as Ban Ki-moon described it, leaving 14 million people in urgently in need of aid. Just as in 2004, when West Indies were galvanised by the hurricanes which killed almost 2,000 across the Caribbean, Pakistan seem to have been pushed on to greater deeds by the plight of the population they represent.
The team have now won two of their last four Tests, both away from home and against excellent opposition. That is as many victories as they managed in their last 20 Tests, between the start of 2007 and their three-wicket win over Australia at Headingley. In that time they had five different Test captains and five different head coaches. It was only five weeks ago, remember, that Shahid Afridi walked out on the team. After being routed by England by 354 runs and then nine wickets in the first two Tests of this series, how easy it would have been for the team to turn in on itself as it did in Australia last winter. How easy to self-destruct, to collapse into a sorry rabble and lose and lose again before flying home.
Instead, despite playing only 30 overs of first-class cricket between the second and third Tests, the Pakistanis regrouped and came back stronger. Kamran Akmal held his catches, eight of them in the match. His brother Umar bit his lip and resisted the temptation to play a stupid shot as the pressure grew in that tense final innings (belying Matt Prior’s earlier sledge to Azhar Ali “come on lads, let’s get the Akmals in!”). Despite him not having played first-class cricket in six months, Mohammad Yousuf made his mark not just as a batsman, but as a mentor, guiding Azhar through a 20-over partnership. And Azhar himself made 92, an innings that proved he had the mettle for Test cricket. With the openers each hitting a tempo-setting 30-something, every single player from one to 11 made a contribution. It was a consummate team performance.
Overnight then, the batting became adequate and the catching almost exemplary. The bowling, of course, has simply been brilliant all series long. The only Test attack that can match them is South Africa’s, and they have no spinners to equal the devilish Saeed Ajmal. And effective as the brute force and slingy swing of Morne Morkel and Dale Steyn may be, I’d sooner watch the art and craft of the two Mohammads, Amir and Asif.
Amir, only 18, seems almost nerveless. He makes Eoin Morgan look a flibbertigibbet. With the ball he has made Strauss his bunny, dismissing him four times in the series so far (Strauss’s other dismissal was to Wahab Riaz, and he was caught behind on all five occasions – the man needs some practice against left-armers), and has just become the youngest man ever to take five wickets in a Test innings in England. For a real sign of his relish for the battle though, look at his batting stats. He has faced 314 balls in this series, second only to Azhar among his team-mates, and he was there at the finish last Saturday, nervelessly grinding out the 16 runs they need to complete the win.
And then there is Asif. This time last year he was fined one million rupees as punishment for being caught in possession of opium in Dubai, though he insisted the drugs were medicine given to him by a doctor. Still, opium seems a suitably recherché intoxicant for Asif to be accused of using. His languid approach and languorous bowling hypnotises the batsmen into submission, each ball curling and drifting through the air like wafts of thin blue smoke from a pipe. In the Confessions of an Opium Eater, Thomas De Quincey tells how he was chased through his nightmares by a cursed crocodile. “I was compelled to live with him for centuries … the abominable head of the crocodile and his leering eyes looked out at me, multiplied into 10,000 repetitions.” I like to imagine batsmen will come to have similar nightmares of Asif, the snapping of the crocodile’s jaws replaced by the dull thud-thud-thud of the ball snaking past the inside edge and hitting the pad in front of middle stump.
Win the last Test and they will be the first team in Test cricket to come back from 2-0 down to win or draw a four- or five-match series since South Africa did it against England in 1956-57 (thanks to Rob Smyth for the stat). Now there is an achievement to put the Ashes in perspective, for a few weeks at least.

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

:k: wow..

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Take a look at this ehsan uncle

they dont think so

http://www.cricinfo.com/ci/content/video_audio/473878.html?genre=33

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

^ I was listening to them an hour ago and I was like 'WHAT THE HECK!!!!' a mere 5 sec of mention of Pakistan in the whole discussion. The jokes like Mendis, Jaheer and Harbajhan were discussed in great depth but the all star attack of Pakistan didn't deserve to be in top 4.

This is Indian crap all over the cricketing world. Really. I am so pissed of their arrogance. Regardless of their success rate or financial success, the BCCI is man handling ICC and cricket world. Bunch of Idiots!!!

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Since when a bowling attack is considered a bowling-cum-fielding attack?

Chappel rates them below Australia and England BECAUSE they of their fielding. what crap. and Donald has given them 5, 1 ahead of india and Lankans who are at 4 each. I seriously suspect bias in their judgements. Pakistan skittled out both England and Australia for miserly totals both home and away.

Australia to challenge in both Lankans and Indian conditions? lets see that in two months time.

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Everybody knows that Cricinfo is biased towards India and Aus And England

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Dudez, if they are biased or dont cover Pakistani strengths, then it has reasons.. Prime reason, Moneyyyy. Its all about money.
Take a look, how much do they earn from Pakistan while on the other side how much do they get from India & Aus. Besides, Pakistan offers other unwanted stuff too. So yes they are biased. But what can you do about it. Better let it go and stay focused on cricket. :k:

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

O btw, Pakistan do has the best bowling attack mA and this is one thing they havent been able to take from us. Even sometimes they just take deep breaths that how come Pakistani soil is producing world class bowlers but just few miles apart, the indians dont. So admit it or no, but they have to suck it up!! :D

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Thats what came to my mind when he said "BECAUSE OF fielding" What a crap. In bowling attack you rate bowlers and not fielders. If anything Pakistani bowlers should actually get more points because of f@#@#d-up fielding. They go about their business without any support!

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

All of them were trying to look for excuses to give them less point, not that it matters. Pakistan bowling is in top 2 whether these clown recognize it or not. After all how many teams have Aust/Eng out for <100 in recent times?

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Ya i know .....To me Our bowling attack is No 1 right now than comes Africa n than AUS

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Exactly!!

mujhe kuch jalney kee boo aa rahi thee

Chappell however did say that he w'd have given Pakistan a 7.5 if their slip catching was better...not that it makes any greater sense

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Pak test bowling is definitely in the top 3 of the world. There are a couple reasons why I can think some sensible people like on the cricinfo panel wouldn't give them enough credit.

1) They have not got the opportunity to display their skills for a consistent period of time. You cannot call anybody #1 just because of 3-4 months of bowling in bowler friendly conditions. Now don't get me wrong - I am not taking any credit away from the Pak bowlers because they are bowling in England. But we cannot ignore the fact that these are one of the most swing friendly conditions. Example.. Anderson is a great bowler in these conditions but he is TONKED around in other parts of the world.. not necessarily just batting tracks but moderate tracks as well. Ofcourse it's not Pak's fault that they havent gotten the opportunity to play everywhere. But this IS a factor in them not getting as high a rating as we would expect.
2) Their horrible fielding drags down the bowlers. I don't agree with this just like you. We are talking about BOWLING attack.. not bowling + fielding.. like some of you have pointed out.

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

^ actually it is not just England. the bowlers have consistently created chances over the past 12 months in Sri Lanka (should have drawn 1-1 instead of losing 0-2), NZ (should have won the series 2-0 instead of drawing it 1-1) and Australia (should have won the Sydney test) only for the pathetic batters to ruin it in one mad session in each instance

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

if Aamer/Asif/Gul/Wahab/Saeed keep performing like this for some more time, they will undoubtedly be recognized as the best in the world. so, I'm not bothered by the cricinfo discussion/conclusion.

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Asif.. you have a good point abt NZ.. but NZ conditions are pretty very similar to ENG on most of their grounds...

In Aus I agree the Sydney test was theirs... but the rest of the series wasn't as good bowlingwise as it's been in England...

I did not follow the SL series..

Don't get me wrong.. I am not doubting their skills.. Aamir and Asif are world class bowlers and they should do good anywhere just like Steyn does.. I just think they haven't gotten enough opportunities to do that..

Although I must say Aamir is the only bowler I like in the attack.. Gul is too inconsistent overall.. and Asif.. I don't know.. I can't fully appreciate a player if he is proven to be using performance enhancing drugs.. even if he allegedly gives them up later..

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

sharabee: Pakistan did force Australia's collapse in first test at melbourne as well, which was a very flat wicket and Aamer took 5 wickets there as well.

Point is, these bowlers have performed whereever they have had the chance to play. It is rather unfair to give them these points specially by Donald (5 points, 1 ahead of india and Nzl? lol!)

Ian Chappell goes on to say that Steyn blows hot and cold.. hello mr chapell??!?!?! Havent you followed Mitchell Johnson's performances since last year's Ashes? Steyn is a much more complete bowler than Johnson ever will be. Country bias is evident here! ;)

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

^ Yes Johnson looked pretty ordinary compared to Aamer in the two tests this Summer. Even part-timer Watson did better in swing and seam conditions. But maybe Australian pitches suit Johnson's bowling more because of the extra bounce and pace he can get on those wickets. Swing and seam is surely not his cup of tea

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

Pakistan has the most skilled bowlers without doubt. They swing in the air, work off the seam, use new ball and old ball equally well. You can't have doubts only jealousy.
English commentators are already worried how their attack bowlers will perform in Aussie conditions. Aussies have much more established batsmen and they are ruthless on their pitches.

Re: Pakistan have the best bowling attack in Test cricket

As I said earlier, Pakistan with this bowling side and a half decent batting could have thrashed this over rated English side 4-0. I wont be surprised if they get a 5-0 thrashing in the upoming Ashes.