Professional outcome of military is very similar to
professional outcome in other fields of expertise. When Bill gates says an Indian Kompooter Kumpany did well, he is not putting a pat on the back. He really means it.
Similarly in the matters of straetegic struggle in the Fgahanistn, if a group of professionals (Pak army officers and jawans in this case) did well, then why an Indian poster should have his hair get on fire?
Have we gone that pessimistic now? and that negative? just because something good is said about your “arch enemy”?
Had you not considered Pakistanis as your arch enemy, you won’t need a fire-extinguisher for your hair.
Got it?