Pakistan for Human Rights Council

This is very good. Hope Pakistan gets elected. :k:

http://www.dawn.com/2006/05/09/int15.htm
*"Over sixty-five UN member states will contest for 47 seats on the new Human Rights Council on Tuesday. Pakistan is a candidate for one of the 13 Asian seats.

Other contestants include India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Bahrain, China, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Japan, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Malaysia, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia and South Korea.

Diplomats here say that Pakistan has a great chance of being elected to the council.

The council replaces the discredited and now defunct Human Rights Commission.

Under the terms of the resolution creating the council, 96 votes are required in the 191-member General Assembly for a country to be elected.

Fourteen countries are contesting for 13 seats from the African region, 13 for six from East European group, 11 for eight seats from Latin American and the Caribbean region and nine for seven from Western European and other groups."*

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

We should have put Mukhtaran Mai as our rep. This would be a sure fire way to win the seat.

Off course our career diplomats won’t be able to use our resources properly.

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

worst violators have no right to sit in such forum.it will be a mockery.

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

Saudi Arabia, Iran and China have no chance in, Bush wont let them in. Iraq might be pitied (doubtful). Malaysia, Japan, South Korea have a sure seat. India is also likely to make it in. Between Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, Pakistan has the highest chances. Philipines has a fair chance. Dont know about Lebanon, Jordan, Kyrgyzstan or Bahrain.

Hope Pakistan gets in. :D

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

UN assembly elects 47 members to new Human Rights Council
font size ZoomIn ZoomOut

After three rounds of secret voting, the UN General Assembly Tuesday elected the 47 members of the newly established Human Rights Council to replace the much criticized and now defunct Human Rights Commission.

After the first round of ballot Tuesday morning, all regional groups -- Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Western Europe and other developed nations -- filled their allocated number of members, except Eastern Europe, where only Russia, Poland and the Czech Republic won seats with the other three remaining vacant.

Two more rounds of voting were held in the afternoon, selecting Azerbaijan, Romania and Ukraine.

Ghana topped the voting for the 13 African seats, which also included South Africa and Algeria, while India received the most votes for the 13 Asian seats, which also included China, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

India polled far more votes than the four current permanent members of the Security Council who contested the maiden election of the recently-established body, giving a boost to New Delhi's hopes for permanent membership of an expanded UNSC.

The vote in which the entire membership of the world body participated showed India securing 173 of the 191 votes, reflecting overwhelming support it enjoyed among member states.

China, a permanent member who was elected from the Asian group, was way down at the eighth position with 146 votes. France and Britain, who were elected from West European group, could muster 150 and 148 votes respectively.

But Germany, which is seeking the permanent membership along with India, got the highest number of votes in West European group, 154.

Russia, which was elected from East European group, could muster only 137 votes.

Also elected from the Asian group were Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, China, South Korea and Indonesia.

In terms of votes, Pakistan was way down at sixth position getting 149 votes. Interestingly, India got far more votes that both Japan and China whose tally was 158 and 146 respectively.

Russia received the most votes for the 6 Eastern European seats in the first round of voting. Eastern Europe witnessed the fiercest competition, with 14 candidate nations vying for six seats.

Brazil received the most votes for the 8 Latin American and Caribbean seats, which also included Cuba and Uruguay, while Germany received the most votes for the 7 Western European region seats, which included France and the United Kingdom.

After the three rounds of voting, General Assembly President Jan Eliasson drew lots to determine the staggering of terms of the first 47 members of the rights council.

Under a resolution adopted by the assembly on March 15, the members of the new rights body are banned from immediate re- election after two successive three-year terms. But it also stipulates that each year a certain number of the members should be changed.

The lots drawing results showed that Algeria and 13 other nations will sit on the new council for one year, Pakistan and 14 other nations for two years, and China and 17 other nations for three years.

The Human Rights Council is scheduled to hold its first meeting in Geneva on June 19.

The United States was the only permanent member of the Security Council which did not run for a seat on the rights council. The U. S. and three other countries voted against the March 15 resolution setting up the rights council, saying that the new body does not go far enough in its reforms. Nevertheless, the resolution was approved by an overwhelming majority.

Under the resolution, members of the Human Rights Council should be elected directly and secretly by the 191-nation assembly and need the backing of a majority of the assembly's membership, or at least 96 votes.

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

^ hehe what paper is this from ;)

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

Pakistan was eventually elected! :jhanda:
http://www.dawn.com/2006/05/10/top2.htm

The list of members and duration of membership and other details about the new UN HR Council;
http://www.un.org/ga/60/elect/hrc/

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

nicols, post link pls...

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

Saudi Arabia and China were elected. No chance, eh?

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

This council is a joke, it has no moral authority. Dictatorships, authoritarian regimes, and theocracies by their very existence deny human rights. This is the fox guarding the hen house.

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

what's this another human right council?...there is one more in world forum...what the heck is this? same topic in two forums..?

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

UNHRC, UN ... they all should be sacked, they serve no purpose at all other than being puppet for some.

Re: Pakistan for Human Rights Council

Good stuff.