^ When you say GDP, its not obvious that you mean "per capita" GDP, is it ?
However, I agree with your per capita GDP numbers given below (from CIA world factbook). Wikipidea is not a credible source for GDP.
Now going back to your arguement, a country 1/3rd the size can have the same or even higher per capita GDP since size does not factor into the per capita GDP calculation. However, India's population is almost 7-8 times that of Pakistan which explains why our per capita GDPs are so close to each other. Its called "Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns".
The more relevant metric would be GDP, which as I have already mentioned is 7 times that of Pakistan.
Ummm, didnt they arrest 2 indian officers who were linked with the mumbai attacks?
even if kasab is Pakistani, it doesnt mean PAKISTAN THE GOV't is behind the attacks, Puh-leease , you guys are embarssing yourself
lets get one thing out of the way:
1) the terrorists did NOT come to Mumbai from Karachi via sea route
its a 50 hour trip in Nautical miles, so it would be even longer by road , not saying someone couldnt travel 50 hours on a boat, but there are 21 radars that look out on that water body daily, they catch fishermen who accidently cross the border BUT THEY COULDNT CATCH THE MEN THAT CAME FROM KRACHI!?!? laughs at their stupidity
2) India needs to apologize to Pakistan for accusing it within 12 hours of the attacks, THE DID THAT WITHOUT EVIDENCE, no investigation had been done and they ran their mouth like pure dumbasses
3) then they make some wussy war threat (LMAO) and then when they felt the pressure, they magically are saying that they never made any talk of a war, WOW aint it?
psshhhtt, PK all the damn way
oh and according to The World Factbook:
India's GDP: $2,600
*Pakistan's GDP: $2,400 *
not bad for a country who's 1/3 the size of India, just mere $200 away, but then again, it makes me laugh that India actually compares itself to Pakistan, a country 1/3 its size, yet when we show some accomplishments, it never gets acknowledged
ironic aint it?