Kaka - analogy that comes to mind is walking and chewing gum at the same time. Remove laws that create an atmosphere of fear, places onus on accused to prove innocence, punishes accused for intent ( which can be impossible for accused to contest) and ruins lives by placing a hold os several months on accused persons lifexwhike they are on trial.
In parallel punish those who carry out such killing.
A tree stand on its roots. You can cut the leaves and branches and repeal the law, but they would grow again in another form. I agree with you that this law is cited as an example outside Pakistan to demonstrate the intolerance of our society, but the roots of intolerance and lawlessness lie elsewhere.
I agree that repealing the law would demonstrate ‘intention’ of the authorities that they would not tolerate dictations from the extremist right, but the establishment and political elite simply do not have that intention nor the intention to improve general law and order.
**
I would risk joining any rally or demonstration against this blasphemy law, provided I am assured that someone murdering me in there will be promptly sent to hell by our courts as well. **
If one asks for the law to be completely abolished, then that person is living in fool’s paradise.
One should struggle for the amendment in the law to change from death penalty to something of lesser degree of punishment if one is really concerned and adamant on that somehow, the law is promoting people to take the law in to their hands.
This is what I am saying. The word ‘parallel’ is key. 1 will not work unless 2 is done in parallel. No question of either/or. Do both, and it would be fantastic.
On a serious note…If all the minorities think that way, it will be big catastrophe. Imagine if 2 to 3 million Hindus make beeline to Indian border. BTW it is already 10-20 a day now.
So lets start from both ends and meet at the center… If that is possible. Lets cut the leaves and branches, but then lets also go at the roots. But once again, the only ones with the tools necessary to perform such a feat is the govt. So the govt must be forced to reform itself, and implement policy from the ground up.
Whether the authorities have the intention or not is a separate issue. Here we should assume they do for the sake of argument. Most solutions I think must come from the top. If we need to reform education, then that wil have to come from the top. If we want to regulate the madrases or promote tolerance through media, that too will have to come through policy from the top. If we want to control extremist organization and prevent their spread, that will also have to be from the top as no one has the resources or the muscle to do it from below. And if the courts need to be reformed, then that too comes from the top.
Either way, you will need to repeal this law to create an atmosphere in which tolerance can be promoted. It wil have to be done eventually, because no one will ever respect the credibility of the govt if the practice institutionalized discrimination and codify policies which promote irrational behavior like the blasphemy law. And this would only be a first step on a long process that includes other suggestions such as reforms at the bottom.
The fate of muslims is the same if they are accused of blasphemy.
And those mobs who target the accused are not following any law so changing the law won’t make any difference. It’s the mentality of people that needs to be changed.
one have to be mental retarded to accuse anyone of blasphemy. Unfortunately we become laughing stock for rest of the world.
Such freaked up people living here in Pakistan that i can’t explain.