Pakistan coach backs more TV help for umpires

KARACHI, March 20 (Reuters) - Pakistan cricket coach Mudassar Nazar and former coach and team captain Javed Miandad have backed the International Cricket Council’s move to increase the use of technology to aid umpiring decisions.

``Umpires are under a lot of pressure due to the increased intrusion of television in coverage of their decisions,‘’ Nazar told Reuters on Wednesday.

``If any technology can be helpful to cricket, it can’t be bad. It must be given a chance to succeed. I don’t think the traditional role of the umpires is under any threat.‘’

Cricket’s ruling body has announced an experiment allowing umpires to use television pictures to check any decision in the Champions Trophy tournament in Sri Lanka in September.

It said that if the trial of allowing umpires to refer every decision – including contentious leg before wicket'' (lbw) decisions or caught behind’’ – to the television umpire proved successful, it could be carried forward.

``At every Test ground they have giant replay screens on which every contentious decision is replayed again and again. Which brings undue pressure on the umpires. I don’t think there is anything wrong if they use more technology to avoid mistakes,‘’ Nazar said.

Currently, international umpires can only refer run-outs, stumpings, contentious catches and shots that may not have crossed the boundary to the third umpire, who uses TV pictures to adjudicate.

Miandad, a veteran of 124 tests, felt that use of more technology would only make the job of the umpires easier.

``There is no harm in trying out a new idea. You don’t know its worth unless you test it out,‘’ he told Reuters.

``If use of more technology can help reduce contentious decisions and human errors and curb unnecessary controversies, it should be experimented with,‘’ he said.


I agree, if technology is available, it should be used to aid the umpires to make correct decisions.

One thing I dont understand...

It's still upto the field umpires to call for a TV replay of an LBW decision, will they call as often as that of Run outs? I dont think that would be possible, as there are so many LBW appeals in one match. Some players even use excessive appealing. Teams like India have players that appeal alot (asif dont get hyper, im not saying its a bad thing), that will really be time consuming if each time the umpire refers to the tv umpire. He can limit them to real close decisions, but then again who knows what happens...

Video killed the umpiring star

Enjoy

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif


AK

you seem to be obsessed with rediff, but that was an interesting article…

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

[quote]
Originally posted by Spock:
**One thing I dont understand...

It's still upto the field umpires to call for a TV replay of an LBW decision, will they call as often as that of Run outs? I dont think that would be possible, as there are so many LBW appeals in one match. Some players even use excessive appealing. Teams like India have players that appeal alot (asif dont get hyper, im not saying its a bad thing), that will really be time consuming if each time the umpire refers to the tv umpire. He can limit them to real close decisions, but then again who knows what happens...**
[/quote]

Well I see it this way if the captain or the palayer is not satisfied they can call for a TV Umpire thats if the ground umpire would take his decision back?

What if the ground umpire does not refer to the 3rd umpire, and makes an obvious bad decision.

Should the 3rd umpire be allowed to bug the ground umpires and shout in the walkie-takie "You dumb idiot! that was a clear snick. Don't let me catch you doing your sneaky patriotic act again, ya hear me!" ??? :)

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/biggrin.gif