Brain dead ??
Anyways, all of Pakistan was Indian prior to 1947. So whats your point, Mr.Med’dle’ ? ?
Pakistan was always a part of the Indian subcontinenet in one form or another, but it was never a part of the MODERN state of India. Some history would do you well… India isnt the sole inheritor of the Indian subcontinent, you were born out of the British empire as was Paksitan. So spare us your Hindu Propaganda bs.
Re: Pakistan and India in terror vow
^ Haha bang on target Med911. Last I checked Pakistan was never 'Indian'.
Of course it probably was in the mind of those unforunately deranged Indians who have still not come to terms with the partition of their beloved ' indivisible mother India'.
Now Pakistani courts have acquited Brahamdagh of treason charges … so can he enjoy Indian hospitality now 
Daily Times - Leading News Resource of Pakistan
Brahamdagh acquitted of treason
LAHORE: An anti-terrorism court has acquitted 12 Baloch leaders, including Jamhoori Watan Party leader Brahamdagh Bugti, of treason charges, a private TV channel reported on Tuesday. Judge Abdul Qayyas Nosherwani of the Anti-Terrorism Court-II acquitted the Baloch leaders since evidence against them was not available. Bugti and others were accused of disgracing the national flag and instigating people against Pakistan. daily times monitor
Pakistan was always a part of the Indian subcontinenet in one form or another, but it was never a part of the MODERN state of India. Some history would do you well... India isnt the sole inheritor of the Indian subcontinent, you were born out of the British empire as was Paksitan. So spare us your Hindu Propaganda bs.
You can play with semantics all you want, but the term Pakistan did not exist earlier whereas the term India did - recall East India Company ???
India has been there for ages - Pakistan was born out of India in 1947.
Re: Pakistan and India in terror vow
^^yeah just like Red Indians in America too, Punjabee are you a red Indian lol
You can play with semantics all you want, but the term Pakistan did not exist earlier whereas the term India did - recall East India Company ???
India has been there for ages - Pakistan was born out of India in 1947.
So what.. The term Indian didnt exist once upon a time, the term Hindu didnt exist once upon a time.
Indian subcontinent has always been comprised of independant states. None of these states called themselves India, they called themselves the name they choose for themselves. The Nizam of Hyderabad ruled not India, but the indepedant state of Hyderabad. The ruler of Kashmir didnt rule India, he ruled Kashmir, as Ranjit Singh ruled the Independant state of Punjab. None of these states were divorced from the Indian subcontinent.
Pakistan is no different. It is just another independant state in the long hisotry of the subcontinent.
Pakistan and India are two seperate states on the Indian subcontinent.
The East India of the East India company, was a very different entity from the modern state of India. It may have shared the same name, but the modern state of India is not the same India as the one ruled by the British.
Its not semantics, it fact. Pakistan and India are two seperate states born out of British India. Pakistan wasnt born out of India the modern state, it was born out of the British empire. We may not be Indian by nationality, but we are still part of the subcontinent last i checked.
And Pakistan the name may not have always been there, but the land that comrpises Pakistan has always been there, and they still are there.
So what.. The term Indian didnt exist once upon a time, the term Hindu didnt exist once upon a time.
Indian subcontinent has always been comprised of independant states. None of these states called themselves India, they called themselves the name they choose for themselves. The Nizam of Hyderabad ruled not India, but the indepedant state of Hyderabad. The ruler of Kashmir didnt rule India, he ruled Kashmir, as Ranjit Singh ruled the Independant state of Punjab. None of these states were divorced from the Indian subcontinent. Pakistan is no different. It is just another independant state in the long hisotry of the subcontinent. Pakistan and India are two seperate states on the Indian subcontinent.
The East India of the East India company, was a very different entity from the modern state of India. It may have shared the same name, but the modern state of India is not the same India as the one ruled by the British.
Its not semantics, it fact. Pakistan and India are two seperate states born out of British India. Pakistan wasnt born out of India the modern state, it was born out of the British empire. We may not be Indian by nationality, but we are still part of the subcontinent last i checked.
And Pakistan the name may not have always been there, but the land that comrpises Pakistan has always been there, and they still are there.
So you agree that Pakistan is/was part of the Indian subcontinent ? OK...I can live with that :p
Re: Pakistan and India in terror vow
^ haye haye maaata toot gaye do hissoon mey! 
You lost Pakistan, gandhi becahra bhi mar gya is dukh sey, now live with it (mahsoos karo).
I am all for cutting off a limb if it is infected with gangrene. Having what is now Pakistan still be a part of India would have unnecessarily dragged us down
Kasab is definently an Indian. Except an Indian wouldnt be able to pull of such a glorious attack. So im left wondering...
Go ask your duely elected parliamentarisn to oppose the official line then.. otherwise your drivel remain drivel.. for all practical purpsoes Qasab remains pakistani.. NAwaz Sharif too exposed it and ppptoo is saying this so who should we believe them ro you
Please learn to differentiate between “British India” and “India”
thankoo.
^ Haha bang on target Med911. Last I checked Pakistan was never 'Indian'.
Of course it probably was in the mind of those unforunately deranged Indians who have still not come to terms with the partition of their beloved ' indivisible mother India'.
Breakup of akhand bharat is the greatest pain ever for hindus and shall remain for ever.
Sooooo sorry to burst your bubble unlike what is taught in Indian schools it is we the big bad Pakis that discarded akhand bharat… please read some history, no no no not Indian version but ohhh let me see, ah! yes try British for a change.. thankoo so much much.
So you agree that Pakistan is/was part of the Indian subcontinent ? OK...I can live with that :p
Yeah, its called geography.
Unfortunately, this part of Asia was titled the "Indian" Subcontinent long before the birth of either India or Pakistan.
Go ask your duely elected parliamentarisn to oppose the official line then.. otherwise your drivel remain drivel.. for all practical purpsoes Qasab remains pakistani.. NAwaz Sharif too exposed it and ppptoo is saying this so who should we believe them ro you
I thik the Partliament is lying in order to please constipated Indians.
Pakistan will acknowledge, even if falsly, that Kasab is Pakistani for the sake of peace. We being a peacful country unlike the rapists, murdeeers and criminals in the Indian parliament.
Thanks for the laughter… some peace you have perpetrated around the world.. in afghanistan, in bangaldesh, in baluchistan in india
BTW here goes all the accusation of raw involvement in baluchistan down the drain on a mainstream pakistani channel…
Nazir Naji makes it cleare there was no evidence and Shahzain Bugti openly asks to show the evidence on again pakistani mainstream media..
LOL. Get yourself an education. Stop wasting my time with your ignorance.
Bangladesh is an indepednat country that has more of an issue with Hindu India then Pakistan.
Afghanistan, you should ask the same question of the meddling Russians, the meddling Americans and Saudis, The meddling Iranis and Indians etc. Infact, ask every country in the region of their role in spreading peace in Afghanistan.
Infact, you can start by asking Afghanistan why it tried to instigate and
mount an insurection in NWFP at the birth of Paksitan?
Baluchistan is an internal matter of PAKSITAN, being fueled by Hindu India covert support of terrorsim there. As such, the Balochistan issue has absoultely no impact on the peace in the rest of the world outside of Pakistans bordrs.
India is hegemonic bully that illegally occupies forrign terrortory. As such, most of its neghbors are weary of it. The fact that India has some of the worlds most longst running insurgency speaks for itself.
So there you go. Your ignorance is exposed agin. Anything else?
LOL.. If your govt isnt involved in the terrorsim in Balochistan, then they are rather stupid or rather incompetant. I think both.
But the reailty is that India is ACTIVELY trying to destabalize our country. They are however to incompetant to do so effectively. None the less, such is the way of intelarional politics and espionage etc. Indians are to naive to understand this, so why bother. We have already handed over the evidence to the Hindus, and hopefull they will recognize the fact that they have been exposed. (Even if pseudo intelectuals like you havent)