"Pak Studies" was taught in a very very biased way.

[antiobl]

Re: “Pak Studies” was taught in a very very biased way.

@LastOfTheDinosaurs

And this history is biased from another angle also i.e. it doesn’t reflect freedom struggle of the leaders of Sindhi, Baluchi, Pashtuns, etc. (Well Punjab has almost no contribution in freedom struggle). All it glorigies are the Muslim League leaders from UP and Punjab, who mostly were British title holders (Khan Bahadars, Nawabs, Jagirdars, etc.).

Sindh was dominated by Muslim League, Pushtoons were divided between Muslim League and Congress, and Punjab was shared by the Unionists, Congress, and Muslim League.

However most of the leaders from modern day Pakistan were big time landlords and businessmen (women). Bacha Khan the great leader was no poverty stricken Pushtoon either. He was rich and so was his family. Rich families sent their boys to college and the resulting education made these boys prominent.

British gave titles to anyone who showed promise including the landowners, and the big time graduates of the British colleges.

Best regards