Pak-indo friendship

[Arleitter]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

@sheyn

Ye kya hain ?

[queer]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

@hanibal

The 60 year old hostility is fueled by these kind of forces… these forces will never let the two countries sit and think about the peace and/or take some serious steps to bring down the tensions between the two…

there are more direct and obvious sources fueling this hatred. are naabigh and hamza and tubeless amreeki and zionist agents? why don’t these ordinary people want peace? did uncle sam pay them off?

[yamahaguy]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

@speak

this idea of Pakistan-india friendship is just disgusting…friendship and and that too with indians who are despised by whole world

have views of those on this topic who have lost their loved ones in indian prisons just cause they went to see a cricket match..and not those who have indian inclinations cause their susraal is in india just like sohaib malik

YOu and people like you is not the whole world; its high time break the shell & comeout of your egg.

[1947]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

Pakistan and India were close during Musharraf’s era but after 26/11 everything got screwed up.

[hanibal]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

@queer

there are more direct and obvious sources fueling this hatred. are naabigh and hamza and tubeless amreeki and zionist agents? why don’t these ordinary people want peace? did uncle sam pay them off?

Does the ordinary people of South Asia gets what they want???

Yes the reason i mentioned is not the only one ( i don’t know from where you get that idea, maybe you assume to much) there are other reasons but yes the reason i mentioned does exist and is one of the major for not having peace between the two nation…

i don’t know about them.. better ask them… i haven’t said that .. may be you talk to much to yourself and assume that the other is saying what you are thinking..

[Aceones]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

Friendship between Pakistan and India is as much possible and practical as friendship between two men where one is standing on the other man’s jugular vein

[Naabigh]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

I presume my comments were taken wrong ! I am all up for peace / harmony - but on a mutual level !

I simply dont agree with the idea of India or Pakistan playing the big brother role for the continent and dominating the politics and policies .

[queer]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

@hanibal

yes the reason i mentioned does exist and is one of the major for not having peace between the two nation…

okay i’ll bite. your “reason” is USA exploits our paala paala innocent countries to fan hositilities, in order to sell its weapons.

1. how much of weaponry has the US sold india before the last two years? zilch.

2. did the animosity between indians and pakistanis start after the US started engaging india in military deals? no.

3. has china sold pakistan more weapons than the US? yes. has russia sold more weapons to india than the US? yes.

Amreeka didn’t do it. China/Russia didn’t do it. religious bigotry of your average indian or pakistani did it, pal. wake up and smell the qurbani ka parsaad.

[The_Jinx]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

@queer

wake up and smell the qurbani ka parsaad.

qurbani ka parsaad? Are you Indian Hindu?

My understanding is that the core issue of Kashmir is the major obstacle in the peace process. The resolution lies in the answer to the question that whether or not presumably the biggest democracy of the world will ever give the right of vote/choice to Kashmiris or not?

[mufaddal]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

We can never be friends, at best we should attempt to be indifferent but at peace neighbors

[Nisha25]

Re: Pak-indo friendship

Pakistan-India talks

                                               There have been so many false dawns in Pakistan-India relations  since the Mumbai attacks of 2008 that any good news must be tempered  with a healthy dose of scepticism. Thus, while it is heartening that the  foreign secretaries of the two countries will meet on the sidelines of a  Saarc summit in Bhutan next week, it would be extremely unrealistic to  expect the meeting to yield tangible progress. We have been through this  process before. The two foreign secretaries also talked at the UN  General Assembly last September but were unable to make any  breakthroughs.

The Mumbai attacks fundamentally changed the nature of the relationship between the two countries. Historically, Pakistan has always insisted that the Kashmir issue should be front and centre of any negotiations while India has wanted a broader agenda that encompasses trade and economic cooperation. That has now been reversed. It is Pakistan that doesn’t want to limit the scope of such talks while India refuses to discuss anything but terrorism. Thus, to repair relations with India, Pakistan first needs to take action on the domestic front. The government and military have been hesitant to take on the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), the militant group believed to be behind the Mumbai attacks. The court case has faltered and it continues to operate relatively unhindered. Until there is a decisive shift in policy, India-Pakistan talks are destined to fail.

Even doomed negotiations, however, are preferable to a complete break in negotiations. It is heartening that both governments, despite their intractable differences, are willing to give diplomacy a chance. The next step, which would ideally take place during the Bhutan talks, would be a softening of their rigid stances. India needs to realise that increased economic cooperation would inevitably lead to greater political relations.** If the two countries are bound together through trade, it will be in their interests not to upset the apple cart. Pakistan, for its part, needs to pledge to fight the LeT with the same vigour and intensity with which it took on militancy in the tribal areas. Fighting home-grown terrorism is vital not just for our relations with India but for our own survival.**
Published in The Express Tribune, January 10th, 2011.