[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
CP - A masala series is basically nothing but to force your players to play in useless matches at TIMBUKTU to fill your coffers.
[/QUOTE]
The indian players are being forced to play this series? How do you know that? Consider the following:
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
If Australia are interested in compensating Pakistan, then they should come to pakistan and play a tri series with India & Pakistan.
[/QUOTE]
You seem ok with the same series being played in Pakistan. So obviously, your problem is not with the series but with the location. This confuses me even more on your definition of masala series as you combined both the location and the player mental condition in your definition of masala series. The above statement, however, contradicts that.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
May be your board is starved of money and your countrymen are starved for cricket, not us.
[/QUOTE]
Why exactly have they agreed to play then? Greed, I suppose?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
(for example in Australia if a team reaches finals and played all the games in the finals of the the VB series, they would end up with at least 9 games meaning at least 20 days more added to their already tight cricketing Calendar).
[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
the fact will remain that it will be another MONTH in the very busy & hectic schedule.
[/QUOTE]
You are fine with hectic schedule as you never objected to extra two series to be played by India. Surely, the 10 year schedule must be a very balanced one as ten nations had to agree to it, keeping in mind not to overburden their players. Now if India plays one more series beyond the 10 yr schedule or 3, what difference does it make? Once a principle is bent, its a principle no more. This is especially true when you consider that you don't have a problem if India has to squeeze in a tour to play Aus in a tri-nation series, but find it objectionable if India has to play Pak. in timbuktu. Clearly, this is not a principled stand because a "significant" tour adds just as much pressure on a busy team as an"insignificant" one.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
As far as India Playing at TIMBUKTU is concerned, we haven't played since 2001 and there is no reason we should start it again.
[/QUOTE]
We've already discussed this. IMO, the whole u-turn makes the Indian govt. look like a hypocrit for not allowing cricket for so long and then changing its mind for nothing. Again, this vindicates the Pak. govt. stand and shows the earlier stand taken by the indian govt. was not based on princples, but just a publicity stunt.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
The reason for that is ICC's 10 Year Schedule is much more structured now, We have an ICC tournament every two years (Knock out trophy & World Cup). We are playing TEST & ODI series with every country at a regular interval and that eliminates the need to play at useless venues like Scotland.
[/QUOTE]
refer above^^
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Asif_k: *
And an India-Pakistan series will generate interest if we play 365 days a year, does it mean we should play everyday ??
[/QUOTE]
No. Excess of anything is bad but then if the hectic schedule is no problem, as we've just established above, why pass the chance? Its good for the cricket, good for the cricket followers.