PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Down on luck, down on spirit

Osman Samiuddin

August 4, 2006

**Oh for the good old days of non-neutral umpires between England and Pakistan. At least then you could - and regularly did - confidently accuse home umpires of bias. Pakistan have no such comfort to fall back after a day that initially promised much, yet eventually turned into one which threatens to, effectively, end the series.

Even before the day began, Darrell Hair :mad: was unlikely to be found on any Pakistan player’s Eid card lists. His performances during Pakistan’s winter series at home against England enraged Pakistani players and officials alike, many of whom privately expressed serious concern over his attitude and performances. After today’s show, forget Eid bans; Hair will be lucky to escape calls for a fatwa, were fatwas still a fashionable thing in Pakistan. :hehe:

For cataloguing purposes, he turned down an outside edge, then a clear inside edge and then a leg-before appeal whose only fault might have been that it was hitting middle. And that it was delivered by Danish Kaneria, who extracts as much out of Hair as he does out of Old Trafford. If it is just incompetence, then it sure as hell has a funny way of regularly seeking out and screwing Pakistan.

The last two decisions went in favour of Kevin Pietersen, whose typically daring hundred fairly yanked any initiative away from Pakistan. He might have considered batting with a golf club were he to have foreseen the luck he was to enjoy today; he was caught behind off a no-ball (though whether Hair would have given it is a different matter entirely) :hehe: and then dropped by Imran Farhat…no wait…Salman Butt…no wait…err. Mercifully, Pietersen then walked off himself, possibly as a result of an injury to his funny bone, obtained while laughing at Butt’s attempt to catch him.

For balance, Billy Doctrove at the other end also missed an inside edge that many in his native Caribbean probably heard. He is also an unlikely recipient of Eid greetings (Inzamam proffered a greeting that lip readers revealed didn’t say ‘Eid Mubarak’); Pakistani fans will not forget the outside edge off Jimmy Adams that Doctrove denied Wasim Akram in Antigua in 2000, allowing Adams to lead his side to a thrilling one-wicket win.

**Their decisions have already cost Pakistan but the irony in all of this, of course, is that apart from an hour in the morning and a spell with the second new ball, the bowling was middling at best. Just before Umar Gul’s spell with the second new ball as Pakistani fans witnessed Butt and Taufeeq Umar’s attempt at off-spin, they must have wondered whether even a half-fit Mohammad Asif and Shoaib Akhtar might have been worth a punt.

Mohammad Sami is likely to be on England’s Christmas card list this year, so generous a soul he has been this series. He was off-colour enough to be black and white here and, in any case, people have swiftly forgotten what he can be like in colour; his pace was down, any movement was invisible, no line or length was settled on and he leaked runs at over five-per-over. Kaneria did precisely what spinners traditionally do on this ground, which isn’t much. Again, he didn’t bowl poorly though he rarely looked like taking a wicket. That tune has accompanied him through the summer.

It left Umar Gul and Shahid Nazir as the most penetrative bowlers for Pakistan, and the inclusion of the latter says more about Pakistan’s bowling troubles on this tour than any figures will ever do. As a selection, Nazir was Pakistan’s take on England’s infamous horses-for-courses policy of the 1980s and 90s, a hope more than anything that a freakish, Neil Mallender circa 1992-type performance might emerge. He started promisingly enough, swinging and seaming the ball earnestly in the morning. In each subsequent spell though, he flagged visibly. He was undercooked and clearly feeling the strain of a first Test in seven years.

Gul bounded in with the enthusiasm that has been so refreshingly at odds with the rest of the attack through the series and his two late afternoon wickets - classic Headingley victims both - at least clawed some momentum back Pakistan’s way. For his endearingly bambi-ish efforts alone, his more erratic moments can be forgiven. It hasn’t much saved Pakistan unfortunately. They are down now and even swift wickets mightn’t repair the damage. Furthermore, Matthew Hoggard and Steve Harmison on a pitch that yields to the new ball, under that cloud cover, against another new opening pair and a batting line-up low on confidence, might put them out sooner rather than later.

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

I remember atleast 2 of his pathetic decisions in Pakistan. He didn’t give Collingwood out caught behind of the bowling of Akhtar. I guess Collingwood was on 50 at that time and eventually made 96

The other one was on the bowling of Kaneria and jones was plumb LBW. Kaneria was on hatrick and could have achieved it but Hair had other ideas.

Looks like hair has something specially against Kaneria. He oftens like to warn him for running on the danger area when other umpires have no problem. On one occasion, he actually warned him twice in an innings, as a result Kaneria couldn’t continue his bowling.

It won’t be incorrect if I say that alot of Pakistan cricket fans including me, hate Darrel Hair. I cannot figure out how such a controversial and incompetent person is still in the ICC elite panel.

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

I wudn't be surprised if umpiring decisions go against us during out batting as well.

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Asif cleared to join Pakistan for Oval test

ISLAMABAD, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Pace bowler Mohammad Asif will rejoin the Pakistan team in England before the fourth test after passing a fitness test conducted by the Pakistan Cricket Board.

Asif, who has taken 25 wickets in five tests, returned home before the first test at Lord’s because of an elbow injury.

“He bowled nine to 10 overs at full strech pain-free and hassle-free. He is being sent to England before the fourth test at the Oval,” board official Saleem Altaf told Reuters on Friday.

Asif will play in the two-day game against the West Indies at Shenley from Aug. 12 to gain some match practice before the test starting five days later.

“I just hope that Shoaib Akhtar is also fit to play at the Oval and, hopefully, we can bring back Pakistan into the series,” Asif said.

“I felt comfortable bowling today and the flow was there. I should be able fit to play the final test.”

Pakistan have fielded a team without Akhtar, Asif and Rana Naved, their three leading pace bowlers, in the first three tests.

Altaf ruled out any prospect of all rounder Shoaib Malik or Naved taking part in the final test.

“The doctors say they still need time to recover from their injuries. For them the one-day series is the target,” he said.

SOURCE: http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/articlenews.aspx?type=cricketNews&storyID=2006-08-04T121238Z_01_ISL151856_RTRIDST_0_SPORT-CRICKET-PAKISTAN-ASIF.XML

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

^hopefully series will not be lost by then.

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Not only that, Kaneria was taken out of attack against West Indies last year after this Hair warned him twice for running on the pitch and if i remember correctly, Hair also warned Salman Butt for running on the danger area against England last year while batting (commentators confirmed that it was extremely harsh decision, Butt got unsettled after getting 2 warnings and gave a catch to close in fielder when he was on 48 or something).

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Pakistan should request ICC that this son of a bicycle should not be allocated any of the matches involving Pakistan since we have already had enough over the past few enough from this entity. I fail to understand how someone can be this biased when there are million and million of viewers witnessing all this. I remember Pakistan requesting the same against robinson (the umpire from zimbabwe) a while back which did work in Paksitan's favour!

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

It keeps happening, man. Hair keeps $hitting on Pakistan over and over again. But what can you do? What really bothers me though is that some people (English fans on BBC) are defonding the umpires saying they are under pressure and they can't always make correct decisions.

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Saturday, August 05, 2006
Poor umpiring costs Pakistan dearly
By Intikhab Alam

Poor umpiring decisions and wrong bowling combination cost Pakistan dearly on the first day of the third England Test at Headingley. The International Cricket Council (ICC) should seriously look into the umpiring standard during the Test and one-day internationals. The teams should be given a right to appeal if they think that a decision of the umpire is not fair.

Instead of Mohammad Sami, Pakistan should have included Samiullah Niazi in the playing eleven as a third seamer. Unfortunately, Sami’s performance in the last two Test matches has not been up to the mark. The Pakistan bowlers were not able to take full advantage of early movement of the typical Headingley pitch after England captain Andrew Strauss won the toss and decided to bat first. In the first eight overs, the bowlers conceded 50 runs. The Headingley track is a kind where you have to bowl up to the batsman. It is not a wicket to bowl short. Apart from Shahid Nazir, both Sami and Umar Gul wasted the new ball. Nazir has impressed me a lot. After lunch skipper Inzamamul Haq decided to bowl Sami and Gul which was beyond anybody’s imagination. The captain brought in Nazir after 45 minutes and the seamer put both England batsmen in trouble. I have said it before many a time that Inzamam is a batsman-captain and he does not understand the psyche of a bowler and sense of bowling. But at the same time I must say that there were and are many batsmen who have proved to be good captains and they also demonstrated how to use the bowlers. It is extremely important for a captain to know how to use his bowlers and from which end. Danish Kaneria, who came in too late, bowled negatively around the wicket and the England batsmen took full advantage of his mistakes.

Unfortunately, there were four umpiring decisions which hurt Pakistan heavily. Particularly that of Kevin Pietersen who was declared not out on the bowling of Nazir when the replays clearly showed that after getting the inside edge the ball went into the gloves of wicket keeper Kamran Akmal. Pietersen, 02 at that time, benefited from the decision and put the Pakistan attack to sword. He played brilliantly. The opening day belonged to him.

The Pakistan team also looked tired and sluggish. They were lacking will to fight back. In the last two hours of the play, England piled up runs very easily. And this was only because of slow bowling overrate. Gul gave Pakistan the much-needed breakthrough when the second new ball was taken. The seamer got rid of Chris Read and Mathew Hoggard. Gul was successful because he pitched the ball up to the batsmen. I hope the Pakistan bowlers have learned their lesson that this is not a pitch to ball short.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\08\05\story_5-8-2006_pg2_3

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Same old umpire bashing my the media, happens every time Hair screws Pakistan. But does anything change? No. There is simply no accountability for umpires and our board too spineless to take a stand. Remember how they withdrew their complaint on Hair last time? You can bank on the fact that we will get screwed when we bat and when we bowl again (if we bowl again).

RJ

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

After this ridiculous display by the umpires, no excuse for not allowing more use of technology. I read this report of 1st days play in the Telegraph UK (I'm not allowed to post urls) that claims Pakistan opposed ICC rule change on umpiring appeals. First I have heard of this.

"The lapses meant England went into lunch three wickets down instead of five, though the latter figure would have stood had the system of appeals to the third umpire recently floated by the International Cricket Council not been defeated 6-5 when voted on by members of the executive board.
The system, broadly similar to one proposed a few years ago by Duncan Fletcher, allowed teams three appeals per innings that the on-field umpires had turned down.
The irony is that the Pakistan board opposed the system more vehemently than anyone, even lobbying others to follow their lead - though not England, who voted for it."

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Wow this is what you call REAL BLASTING!!!:slight_smile:

Hair-raising stint to hurt Inzy’s team

By Kamran Abbasi
LEEDS, Aug 4: “Umpire gives Inzy out before a ball is bowled,” is the prediction. The Nostradamus is Oxy, writing on Pakistan cricket forum pakpassion.net.

The man raising his finger is Darrell Hair. It commemorates the day Hair tried to bury Pakistan.

Hair has a track record. He called Muttiah Muralitharan for throwing. Inderjit Singh Bindra, former president of the BCCI, questioned his impartiality and right to umpire internationals.

Billy Doctrove runs Hair close at the top of Pakistan’s list of undesirables. In 2000, he helped West Indies stop Pakistan winning their first series in the Caribbean.

Guess what? Both champions are umpiring this Test, and at Headingley — scene of Graham Gooch’s 1992 run out by a mile (not given) and Sikander Bakht’s infamous 1982 bat pad that was all pad (given) — Pakistan should have expected a hammering from the umpires. They sure got it.

England won the toss and posted a half-century opening partnership but Pakistan could have, and should have by rights, seized the match.

First, Hair reprieved Andrew Strauss, a caught behind hindered by Pakistan’s late appeal. Then Hair freed Kevin Pietersen on two.

A huge inside edge off Shahid Nazir — registering seven on the Richter scale — brushed Pietersen’s thigh pad on its way through. Pakistan danced, Hair was statuesque.

Pietersen pointed to his thigh. Pakistan were cheated.

Not to miss out on the party, Doctrove struck: another inside edge, this time Alastair Cook from Sami, bat well clear of body. Doctrove, first match on the elite umpiring panel, turned down the appeal.

A decision that prompted a riot of expletives, interestingly in English, from Inzamam now stirred to a state of fury.

England should have been five down by lunch, echoes of 1987. A remarkable outcome since Sami began the morning jogging in, spraying the ball generously. Later, he returned with greater energy, better direction. But the world is left wishing for the firebrand bowling over 90mph.

Perhaps Sami’s energy disappeared with his hair, a Samsonian trait new to Pakistan.

His fellow short-back-and-sides merchant, Umar Gul, kept England at bay, with a probing spell of fine line and perturbing movement that earned him four scalps. He would finish the day on a high.

But Shahid Nazir returned to international cricket after seven years with a line even finer and movement more perturbing. Pakistan finally resembled a Test bowling attack, albeit a medium-paced one.

The umpires, though, continued their fine form after lunch. Hair gave Pietersen another life on twenty. In the world of fair play he was leg-before to Kaneria.

On twenty-nine he was again caught Kamran bowled Shahid, but Hair — no evidence of eagle eyes until then — spotted a no-ball. Then Pietersen, on a hundred and four, was dropped by Salman Butt, once more off Shahid.

Pietersen’s third innings of the day was his best. Pulling, driving, and forcing with such brutality that he injured his left elbow. He may have retired hurt, embarrassed.

As the final session drifted away and back towards Pakistan, Shahid struck Hair with a misdirected throw. It was some kind of retribution but nowhere near enough. Pakistan, Shahid Nazir, and the team huddle had deserved better.

http://www.dawn.com/2006/08/05/spt2.htm

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

The sad thing is that a few weeks from now, no one will remember the umpiring. All that will be remembered will be the bottom line, how England thrashed Pakistan and won the series. Sure, there might be the usual hue and cry but such noise will fade into oblivion like it always does.....and next time it will happen all over again.......

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here


Did it really happen? I wanna watch this video with fielders' reaction.... did Hair get "bowled"? :CareBear:

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

hai england won

:nono: stop being so negative

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

**Fastest bowler plays village game **

The fastest bowler in the world is turning out for a village cricket team in the West Midlands.

As Pakistan face England in the third Test, their paceman Shoaib Akhtar will be leading the attack for Berkswell.

Akhtar, who is returning from an ankle injury, hopes the match against the St Georges club from Telford, Shrops, will help him be fit for the fourth Test.

Pakistani coach Bob Woolmer said: “We want him to bowl at full speed - so good luck to the poor blokes.”
Berkswell signed up the 30-year-old bowler, who is nicknamed the Rawalpindi Express, as an overseas player thanks to club captain Dominic Ostler who played under Woolmer for Warwickshire during the 1990s.

Berkswell club member Paddy Milnes told BBC News they were hoping Akhtar would bowl eight to 10 overs for them.

He said the Shropshire side had taken the addition to the Berkswell squad in good spirit.

“They see it as an opportunity, a highlight of their career, to potentially face one of the fastest bowlers in the world,” said Mr Milnes.

Akhtar was also drawing the crowds to the village ground.

“We are expecting two to three hundred people,” said Mr Milnes. “Normally we can expect one man a cat and a dog.”

Akhtar said earlier in the week: "I can’t wait to start playing again. I want to get a bit of match practice before the Oval Test.

“I’m building up to bowling at full pace and power and I am getting there.”
The 55 overs game in the third tier of the Birmingham league started at 1230 BST and is likely to go on until about 1900 BST.

SOURCE: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_midlands/5247984.stm

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

Pakistan captain stung by umpiring decisions

By Simon Briggs at Headingley
Telegraph.co.uk

Pakistan’s captain, Inzamam-ul-Haq, is what they call a low-heartbeat player. His drowsy demeanour rarely gives any clue as to whether he has just punched the ball through the covers or edged to slip.

So when the cameras caught Inzamam unleashing a very Anglo-Saxon expletive, just before lunch yesterday, you could tell how badly the umpiring had stung him.

Three times the fielders went up for impassioned appeals for caught behind. Three times they were stymied by the umpires, Darrell Hair and Billy Doctrove.
The replays sided with the bowlers: if cricket’s guardians had approved plans for a right of appeal, Pakistan’s coach, Bob Woolmer, would have had a three-for.

Instead, the chances are that their dressing-room television now has a size-10 boot where the screen ought to be.

This was a rare opportunity for Inzamam’s men to play like cornered tigers, as Imran Khan so memorably put it during the 1992 World Cup.

Even after their abject surrender at Old Trafford, no team are better at shifting from reverse gear to fifth, with no middle ground in between.

Had Kevin Pietersen been dismissed off his crucial caught-behind shout, when his score was just two, they might have staged a comeback to rank with Ian Botham’s great match here 25 years ago.

A Pakistani reporter asked Pietersen afterwards why he hadn’t walked - a decent question, but not one that is heard too often these days, when the assumption is that decisions even themselves out. “I wasn’t 100 per cent sure I had nicked it,” Pietersen replied. “I’m not out there to give decisions. I’m not the only batsman in the world who doesn’t walk.”

''You take the rough with the smooth," he added. "I got a decision in the first innings at Lord’s, when I was feeling very good about myself. I was hitting the ball as sweetly

as I can do at the start of an innings and I was lbw to a ball going over the stumps. That’s just the game of cricket - that’s why we love it."

Pietersen may have loved the game yesterday, but the Pakistanis clearly did not. The little-known Shahid Nazir bowled better than any of his team-mates yesterday morning, and yet came away with just one wicket after Hair turned down appeals against Andrew Strauss and Pietersen.

Despite Yorkshire’s strong Asian links, Headingley has been an unwelcoming sort of ground for Pakistan. It was here, in 1982, that David Constant contentiously gave Sikhander Bakht out, caught at short-leg.

Pakistan claimed that the decision cost them the match and the series, and the ill-will festered for years. Ten years later Graham Gooch was given not out by Ken Palmer, when he was at least a yard short of the crease.

Every time the teams seemed to be approaching a spirit of detente, another row would break out. Most notoriously, there was the Shakoor Rana affair in Faisalabad in 1987-88, when the man with the raised index finger was the England captain, Mike Gatting.

At least the politics have now been watered-down by the appointment of neutral umpires. It is hard to accuse Hair of bias, though the Sri Lankans also felt hard done by during England’s win at Edgbaston.

Doctrove is standing in his first Test in England, and may need more time to adjust to Headingley’s unique microclimate. The ball which took Alastair Cook’s inside edge was a classic inswinger that went further off the pitch, and he may have thought it was just carrying on in the same direction.

What might have to be looked at is the business of giving the umpires earpieces that are connected to their colleagues in the Pavilion, but not to the broadcasters’ stump microphones.

The use of amplified sound is the one technological experiment that the umpires enjoyed, when it was trialed during a Champions Trophy two years ago.

The objections to its use have something to do with the question of whether the same facilities can be made available all over the world. But if square-leg cameras can be laid on, why not wired-up headsets?

SOURCE: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?xml=/sport/2006/08/05/scbrig05.xml

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

**England risk letting another series slip
By Scyld Berry at Headingley **
Telegraph.co.uk

England need to nail Pakistan in this third Test. If they don’t, a series victory could slip through England’s fingers like all the others have done since the Ashes were won almost one year ago.

For the fourth and last Test at the Oval Pakistan could have or one or two strike-bowlers, instead of none as they have had so far this summer. Shoaib Akhtar is pawing the ground again while Mohammad Asif, their new man, is recovering from an elbow injury sufficiently quickly to make a mark yet on this series and England’s slightly scarred psyche.

Losing in Pakistan last winter was vexing enough, but drawing against Sri Lanka was England’s greatest exasperation in recent times. If this series also falls flat, it will make four in a row which England have been unable to win. No sort of preparation for facing Australian customs officers, let alone their cricketers.

At least an England win and a draw are by far the likeliest options, magnificently as Younis Khan and Mohammad Yousuf have batted so far in cutting England’s lead to 313 with eight of their first innings wickets still remaining. The umpiring has made sure of that. Any chance of a Pakistan win was snuffed out when it went against them on the opening day, although yesterday it was beyond reproach, when the umpires took out their earpieces connecting them to the third umpire and devoted all their faculties to the task in hand.

It is strange, but the defining moments of both the second and third Tests have occurred at the same stage; in the second hour of the game’s opening session. At Old Trafford Pakistan were vanquished when Steve Harmison first alarmed them with his bounce; here the tourists were undone by the umpiring of Darrell Hair, with Billy Doctrove in support.

Each official made only one poor error, but Hair’s in particular shaped this match, when Kevin Pietersen was reprieved after scoring two of his 135 runs. It was not only the inside edge on to thigh pad but the other evidential signs: the batsman looking back like Lot’s wife, the genuine spontaneity of the appeal, even the batsman’s attempt as an afterthought to explain it away.

FULL ARTICLE
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml?xml=/sport/2006/08/06/scengl06.xml&page=1

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

I vaguely remember this a few weeks ago. It was typical PCB incompetent BS about appeals being contratry to the spirit and traditions of the game. It was as if those nincompoops never watched the umpiring in the England-Pakistan series last winter.

Re: PAK in ENG (2006) - Media Coverage Center - Post articles here

where are the highlights of this game posted? thanks