Pair of male & female

Re: Pair of male & female

Pleasure is all mine to discuss with bella.. ;)

You just keep jumping up and down janab.

Re: Pair of male & female

Birth control is not the same as homosexuality.

Birth control is temporary and can be used to control social issues.

Homosexuality is utterly wrong.

Happy?

Now, you lost FOUR points so far:

1- Anatomical basis,

2- not having choices and

3- using pleasure as a defense and

4- using birth control as similar example.

Re: Pair of male & female


but you said sex just for pleasure is wrong. birthcontrol makes sex JUST for pleasure. then it's wrong using YOUR logic. please be honest atleast.

[quote]
Birth control is temporary and can be used to control social issues.
[/quote]
Even if it's temporary, it still makes sex JUST FOR pleasure. Even you cannot defend your own logic now! and what about permanent methods such as hysterectomy, tubal ligation and such. Should a woman who has had her tubes tied be able to have sex? wont that sex be JUST for pleasure? please explain. thanks.

Re: Pair of male & female

And the drama continues...

Re: Pair of male & female

diwana cough cough bella the three musketeers

Re: Pair of male & female

Never said sex just for pleasure is wrong.

All I opposed is using pleasure as a factor to support homosexuality. Since then we have to accept bestiality and pedophilia based on same argument.

Hysterectomy for birth control?

Tubal ligation for birth control on medical ground for pregnancy being harmful and after the person already had child or children is fine.

Those heterosexual coupleswho unfortunately cannot conceive still are considered normal despite they are doing the act merely for pleasure.


bella!

You have bored me to extreme. Sorry.

You can't handle further sophisticated/delicate ed talk about medical and scientific reasons and arguments against homosexuality since you could not bring simple physical and anatomical reason supporting homosexuality.

All you brought speculative answers and no concrete evidence,.... (not your fault since you may not be able to read scientific studies and believe on what so called experts in 'science' say).

Re: Pair of male & female

please stop lying, you clearly mentioned that sex just for pleasure is wrong. you said that a few times, not just once. be honest atleast. when you compare homosexuality to bestiality and pedophilia you LOSE all credibility for anything because you're comparing abuse to consentual sex. why can't you comprehend such simple logic?

[quote]
Hysterectomy for birth control?

Tubal ligation for birth control on medical ground for pregnancy being harmful and after the person already had child or children is fine.
[/quote]

who are you to decide if a woman should be able to do it or not? there are women who CHOOSE never to have children. is that wrong too?

[quote]

Those heterosexual coupleswho unfortunately cannot conceive still are considered normal despite they are doing the act merely for pleasure.
[/quote]

why is that? your clearly mentioned sex for ONLY Pleasure is wrong. and what about couples that CHOOSE to be childless. many people dont want to have children, is it wrong for them to have sex?

please stop contradicting your own BS theories.

[quote]

bella!

You have bored me to extreme. Sorry.

You can't handle further sophisticated/delicate ed talk about medical and scientific reasons and arguments against homosexuality since you could not bring simple physical and anatomical reason supporting homosexuality.
[/quote]

Please explain to me why heterosexuals have oral sex then,? is it supporting your anatomical theory?

[quote]
All you brought speculative answers and no concrete evidence,.... (not your fault since you may not be able to read scientific studies and believe on what so called experts in 'science' say).
[/quote]

and you brought NO evidence, just your own ideas which have no scientific or even moral basis at this point.

Re: Pair of male & female

You could not prove bestiality always an abuse. ;)

Quote me whwre I said having sex just for pleasure is wrong...without talking about homosexuality in the background.

I believe sex just for pleasure is legit as long as the partners are also legit.

I don't feel like bringing you any scientific argument knowing you have no ability to understand ..sorry.

It will take certain amount of background knowledge of science, medicine and genetics before you could even get the message.

I know your husband is a doctor all my respect for him..., but still does not mean anything.

Call me judgmental here all you want.

Re: Pair of male & female

i did but you keep making me repeat everything. please tell me how animal can give consent?
and before you repeat same BS again about consent regarding killing an animal, you really need to figure out why it's considered okay to kill an animal to eat, YET abusing/hitting an animal is a crime punishable by law.

and you still didn't answer if its okay for couples to remain childless by choice? wont that couple be having sex just for pleasure? and why is it okay to use birth control temporarily if its so wrong to have sex only for pleasure. you have been contradicting yourself constantly, so please answer WISELY

Re: Pair of male & female

who decides that?? you? lol

[quote]
I don't feel like bringing you any scientific argument knowing you have no ability to understand ..sorry.
[/quote]

or is it that you have NONE? please show me how modern science can back up your claims. i have shown plenty of scientific evidence which you seem to ignore conveniently.

[quote]
It will take certain amount of background knowledge of science, medicine and genetics before you could even get the message.
[/quote]

So geneticists working at UCLA with many years of education,phDs and research have less knowledge than you? interesting.
also, is American association of Psychiatry beneath you in terms of knowledge?
please tell me why American association of psychiatry has not labeled homosexuality as a disease, mental problem or pathology? it's hilarious how you seem to think you know more than them.

[quote]
I know your husband is a doctor all my respect for him..., but still does not mean anything.
[/quote]

my posts are not based on his knowledge of medicine. i have never even discussed this topic with him. you don't need to be a doctor to know that sexual orientation is not a choice. please tell me WHY American psychiatry association disagrees with you. even if you're a doctor, dont you think APA is alot more qualified than you ?

[quote]
Call me judgmental here all you want.
[/quote]

couldn't care less if you're judgmental or not. im only calling you out on your contradiction and dishonesty. it's one thing to judge, but its one thing to be dishonest

Re: Pair of male & female

APA is a joke. Like I said you have no ability to get the point so far. Read about their decision from various different sources. :)

This is my last post to you in this thread. I would rather talk to someone who had basic knowledge of the topic from different angles.

Before you ever try to embark upon these kind of topics, at least have some background knowledge. Seriously!

P.S. No idea why you remind me of Raj_ind, your 'male version'. :D

Re: Pair of male & female

hmm an organization made of DOCTORS is a joke… okay. APA is a joke and your posts are?? lol. wont even get into that.

great to know its your last post, and great to see you accept your inability to prove any thing but continuous dishonesty is prominent throughout all your posts . It’s interesting how you ignored all my questions but keep saying that i don’t have enough knowledge. lol.

and you’re more knowledgeable than scientists and doctors with PhDs. again more hilarious claims. :hehe: