Orfa's world

Subsequent to reading the following article, BE SURE to check out this one. Always so wonderful to see that some of our fellow Muslims have their priorities in order.

This woman lost everthing in a US air raid. A year on, she is still living amid the rubble
Rory McCarthy, The Guardian, 7 October 2002

Few people paid a higher price when America’s military machine launched its war in Afghanistan a year ago today than Orfa. She was away visiting relatives when the American fighter jet dropped out of the clear midday sky and dived towards her village in the hills outside Kabul. When she returned home a few days later it was left to her neighbours to explain the inexplicable.

They told her that the aircraft, almost certainly an F-16, had mistakenly fired a precision Mk 82 500lb bomb directly at her small mud and stone house, killing her husband, carpet weaver Gul Ahmad, his second wife, five of their daughters and one son. Two children from the house next door also died.

When the Guardian first found Orfa last year, four weeks after the bombing, she was still deep in shock, haunted by the horrifying image of her family’s remains. Their bodies were so badly torn apart they could not be identified for separate graves.

A year on, a line of eight green flags tied to stout wooden poles stands above the family grave just yards away from Orfa’s ruined home in Bibi Mahru. The village sits several hundred metres below what used to be an important Taliban radar and gun emplacement. It seems likely it was the target of the US jets on the day Orfa’s family were mistakenly hit.

From the start of the US campaign in Afghanistan on October 7, western governments promised that this time it would be different. Afghans would not be abandoned to their fate, as they had been after the end of Soviet occupation in 1989.

Once the bombing was done, and the Taliban removed, humanitarian aid amounting to $4.5bn (£2.8bn) would be pumped in to rebuild the country, brick by brick, home by home. There can be few better qualified subjects for western help than Orfa as she struggles to raise her surviving four daughters and two sons. Today, on the anniversary of the bombing, her house is still a pile of rubble, she has received no compensation and reconstruction remains a pipe dream.

“I don’t know how long it will be now until the Americans help us,” Orfa, 32, said. “They have done nothing for us and I don’t know what to do with my children or how to support them.”

The awkward truth is that the only outside help Orfa has received has come from the visitors who arrived at Bibi Mahru the day after the bombing. They were Taliban officials still clinging to power in the dying days of the ultra-orthodox Islamist regime and they brought shrouds for the dead as well as 17,000 Pakistan rupees (£190).

Orfa shared the Taliban’s money with her next-door neighbour, whose two children were killed by the same bomb. Most of her portion went on medical care for her seriously injured and deeply disturbed son, Jawad, 14.

“He went to his father’s grave every day and just stood there staring it at. I don’t have any more money to spend on medical care for him,” she said. Now the boy has been sent to Pakistan with an aunt in an attempt to break his grief-stricken obsession.

Estimates of the numbers killed by air strikes from B52 high-altitude bombers, F-16 and F-18 fighter jets and the devastating AC-130 Spectre gunships are elusive. The Afghan and American governments say fewer than 400 people died. A San Francisco-based human rights group, Global Exchange, has painstakingly confirmed at least 812 deaths. Many suspect the true number could be as high as 2,000, scattered in towns and villages across the map.

Far harder to calculate is the extent of psychological trauma inflicted on a population already struggling to survive after years of drought, economic collapse and 20 years of war. Many children appear to have suffered trauma similar to that of Jawad.

In a small mud-brick compound on the other side of Kabul sits Said Bilal, 10. In November he was in his uncle’s house when it was hit by a misguided American bomb. It was one of the last munitions dropped on Kabul before the Taliban fled and it killed the boy’s newly wed uncle, Said Akbar, and his wife Sawila.

“Said Bilal was just 10 metres away when the bomb fell. He went around the ruins of the house picking up pieces of flesh from his uncle’s body,” said his cousin Said Najib. “Now he is very disturbed.”

The boy’s distress is obvious. He barely speaks and his head hangs listlessly. The family is struggling to find money to re build their home and they cannot afford the medical treatment Said Bilal clearly needs.

The relatives of the civilian victims of the US bombing campaign have joined Afghanistan’s large underclass. Often the survivors are women who lost sons or husbands and who find it most difficult to obtain work in this conservative Islamic society. The flood of two million refugees returning home from Pakistan and Iran is also forcing the most vulnerable single-parent families and widows out of cheap rented accommodation.

“The government doesn’t consider them a priority,” said Nilufar Shuja, the Afghanistan co-ordinator for Global Exchange. “They don’t need handouts, just the money to rebuild their homes and get back on their feet.”

These are the people who most need the help of the $4.5bn reconstruction plan agreed at a Tokyo conference in January. Some of the money has been spent repairing schools and clinics in Kabul. Outside the capital, where security is less certain, very little has filtered through, particularly in the Pashtun areas of the south that were the Taliban’s heartland.

The Afghan government now recognises this slow disbursement of pledged aid money as the greatest failing of the past year. “The money that has been promised is not sufficient to rebuild our country,” said Omar Samad, the Afghan foreign ministry spokesman.

The disappointment began when the aid pledges were first unveiled in Tokyo. While similar reconstruction projects in Bosnia, Lebanon and the West Bank and Gaza were worth at least $1,000 a person, the Afghan package fell far short. The Tokyo pledges amount to just $225 for every Afghan.

“We are now seriously talking about having more Tokyos to bring us to a level that is realistic,” said Mr Samad. The Afghan government hopes for up to $15bn over the next 10 years.

Although $1.8bn was due to be spent on reconstruction in this first year, bureaucracy, particularly at the UN, and the cost of emergency humanitarian aid have swallowed most of the money. There are still huge areas of the country where people are on the brink of starvation and aid workers have warned that the situation is likely to get even worse as winter approaches in the weeks ahead. A four-year drought is also consuming more of the money than was expected, leaving only $100m this year for reconstruction.

The average cost of maintaining a foreign UN employee in Afghanistan for a year is around $250,000. Add to that the soaring cost of house rentals, which means some UN agencies are paying $15,000 a month for their Kabul offices, and it is little wonder funds are running out.

Some aid experts are starting to question the assumption that development work alone can bring peace and security to countries like Afghanistan that have been racked by years of conflict. “There is a dangerous tendency to think we can use aid to get peace and security on the cheap,” said Andrew Wilder, director of the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit in Kabul.

“We raised expectations too high. We all read the documents about lessons learned in places like Rwanda and Kosovo. We all knew a lot of what was going to happen but it didn’t lead to a significant improvement in how the international aid community responded.”

He argues that western governments should have pressed earlier for an expansion of the international peacekeeping force, which is still confined to Kabul.

Today Orfa and her five children share with another family a small two-room hut, a few metres from the ruins of her former home. Her share of the monthly rent is 500,000 afghanis (£7.50) and she earns just 800,000 afghanis a month tailoring for her neighbours. When people in the village want to repair their clothes they bring them to her because they know she cannot support her family on her own.

Standing in the courtyard of her home she clutched the only photograph she has left of her husband. It is a small, creased black and white picture showing him 10 years ago as a handsome young man. “Under the Taliban, life was bad but at least my husband and my son were working,” she said. “Now how can I support us all? What am I supposed to do?”

A BBC report from a few days ago about the mounting civilian deaths in Afghanistan..

Afghanistan’s civilian deaths mount](BBC News | SOUTH ASIA | Afghanistan's civilian deaths mount) BBC News 03 Jan 03 (Excerpt)

Professor Herold has been gathering data on civilian casualties since 7 October by culling information from news agencies, major newspapers and first hand accounts. His report, which places the death toll at 3,767, lists the number of casualties, location, type of weapon and source of information. “In fact the figure I came up with is a very, very conservative estimate,” Professor Herold said in a radio interview. “I think that a much more realistic figure would be around 5,000. You know for Afghanistan, 3,700 to 5,000 is a really substantial number.”

Latest deaths
US forces were reported to have killed 106 Afghan civilians when they dropped bombs on the village of Qalaye Naizi, in eastern Afghanistan. Military authorities denied having mistakenly bombed a village, and said the warplanes had targeted a compound used by al-Qaeda. Afghan government official “We have lost too many innocent lives already”. On 27 December, US bombers were said to have killed 40 civilians in Ghazni, south-west of Kabul. And last month, American warplanes hit a convoy transporting tribal elders to the inauguration of the Afghanistan government in Kabul. About 65 people were killed.

Other reported incidents include:
11 October: Two US jets were said to have bombed the mountain village of Karam. The death toll was estimated at between 100 and 160.
13 October: Bombs fell on the Qila Meer Abas neighbourhood, two kilometres south of Kabul airport. Four civilians were reportedly killed
18 October: Some 47 civilians were said to have been killed when a central market place, Sarai Shamali, near Kandahar, was bombed.
23 October: More than 90 civilians were reportedly killed when low-flying US gun ships fired on the farming villages of Bori Chokar and Chowkar-karez, north of Kandahar.
31 October: An F-18 was said to have bombed a Red Crescent clinic in a pre-dawn raid, killing between 15 and 25 people.
10 November: Villages in the Khakrez district were reportedly bombed, killing more than 150 civilians

If the world would see these people dieing when the bombing took place.....then the situation might be changed.......I mean if all this was shown live on tv around the world just like 9-11........people would realise how much destruction......how much distress.......how much dukh other people have to bear......

Well, if she was Canadian, she might have gotten her day in court against the perpetrators....but shes an afghan...read dispensable.

[quote]
If the world would see these people dieing when the bombing took place.....then the situation might be changed.......I mean if all this was shown live on tv around the world just like 9-11........people would realise how much destruction......how much distress.......how much dukh other people have to bear......

[/quote]

You think people really care? Haha.

And ask yourself, who owns the media? Why would anyone do a stupid thing like that, and decrease their viewer ratings and get backfire from the governments controlling them?

[quote]

The average cost of maintaining a foreign UN employee in Afghanistan for a year is around $250,000. Add to that the soaring cost of house rentals, which means some UN agencies are paying $15,000 a month for their Kabul offices, and it is little wonder funds are running out.
[/quote]

This was very funny. Where can I get a house for $15,000 monthly rent ($180k annual), esp. in Afghanistan? It would have to be a marble fort. Do they have any... standing mud forts left, that is?

The standard salary for an Aid worker is between 25-60k, and upto 85k for the top brass. 180k for a rental isn't easy to get approval for in any department in any corporation either in the US or abroad, even if u sleep with the boss. I wonder whose pockets $14,950 of the $15k monthly rental are warming.

The average cost of maintaining a foreign UN employee in Afghanistan is $250k per annum because of things that have got nothing to do with aiding nations. It's high not because of the aid worker's airfare, life insurance, medical expenses, security costs and intranational travel expenses, but because Aid workers's families get relocation benefits that include expensive private education, housing, security and return trips home. If all those ridiculous perks are cut out, 35-40% of bureaucratic expenses will be eliminated right there.

how many afghanis did hte taliban kill? Any figures around? Also, was there remorse for the executions in the soccer stadiums and the streets of kabul. Puhlease!!

It's a sad tale. She is an unfortunate victim of a mistake. I am sure the reconnaisance was probably provided by her neighbor.

Ana, Aid workers have one of the most dangerous jobs in the world, they are at the forefront of providing humanitarian services to people displaced during war, famine and other natural disasters.. they also are risking their lives on a daily basis by carrying out their duties even during the heat of battles. As regards to the costs involved, my understanding is that the majority of Aid workers do not earn the levels you are stating above.. Dont forget there are dozens of NGO's, many of which have very little resources and utilize an army of volunteers.. im sure nadia who carried out AID work in Afghanistan & Pakistan last year will be able to comment further about this..

^ I am talking about salaried UN employees, not volunteers.

^ Regarding costs of UN employees, in my opinion there needs to be a more effective coordination in Aid efforts between the UN and other AID organisations such as the Red Cross, Save the Children, Medicin sans frantiers.. this may save on operational expenses. At the same time, I believe its very important for the UN to employ specialists/Doctors/nurses/Consultants and others, even if it means providing extra perks.. these experts dont have to work for the UN especially if they can get a higher paid job elsewhere.. without their knowledge and expertise im sure the UN Aid efforts would be in a very difficult situation.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ana: *

You think people really care? Haha.

And ask yourself, who owns the media? Why would anyone do a stupid thing like that, and decrease their viewer ratings and get backfire from the governments controlling them?

[/QUOTE]

Wow...and I thought I was the only one who's usually pessimistic.....okay so I wasn't right to think it that way.....I just thought if those live scenes were shown people would care more even it wasn't much....and I am in reality....what I am saying won't become reality if you know what I mean.....I was just sharing my thoughts...:)