My opinion re: fundamentalist Islam is just that - an opinion; and, no - I am not an appendage to any ideologies, eastern or western; what I express are my own two bits.
Personally, I do not have any problem in you guys calling me whatever you want!
You know saqib - if you are trying to divert attention from what I contented in my post; you are doing one heck of a job! The point of my contention was and if you could pls respond:
"If you can oulaw other religions .....; then what prevents you from doing the same to the other sects of Islam. Where does it all end ?
msaqibj - Did you even read my post and try to understand the difference between associating a term with a member of this forum vs. expressing one's opinion on the age of a religion?
Adbulmalick:
This thread was to discuss the "life after death" of Muslims and Non-Muslims but you (according to your habit) are trying your best to divert the original theme of the thread.
Actually you are the one who is trying to bring the Shia, Sunni differences in this discussion.
As many as try you do, you can not start a "Fasaad" because people out there have, actually, come to know the reality of people like you.
Roman: Lets not talk about this, I did read your comments and did understand it. Thanks for your input and kind advice.....
I got it very clearly:
Adbulmalick:
[quote] Fundamentalist Islam is Faulty, Outdated and Primitive.
[/quote]
Insulting one billion Muslims come under believes and insulting one "Fasaadi" comes under morality.
Deciding On the Base of Personal Feelings Tells How Low People Act at Controlling Positions.
msaqib - There is a difference between Fundamentalist Islam and Islam. I hope you understand that difference.
Although Adbulmalick has not backed up his opinion or statement by providing why he thinks so, I still think that it debatable and one should rather debate it and prove one's point of view than getting insulted by it. Why it/it is not (i.e. Fundamentalist Islam) faulty, outdated, and/or primitive? What you think and why?
There is nothing like fundamentalist Islam and Islam,
Fundamentalist Islam is a term being used by the western People for those who follow the Islam strictly and Western Slaves are the one who are giving strength to this term.
Otherwise there is no fundamentalist Islam term
BTW Roman: Just like the way you and other get offended by the terms "Western Slaves", "Liberal Fanatics", I get offended if some one uses the term fundamentalist Islam.
I hope you understand now why I use the strong terms when these people use their terminology.
If they make me offended with their terminology, then I have my all rights to make them offended with my terminology.
msaqibj - I don't have any problem in your using the term 'Western Slaves', but I do have a problem using in a context where it is associated with a member of this forum extensively, and vice versa.
I understand that people can go off on using certain expression in their arguments which they don't realize may offend others or have any other effect, but if the same words are used again and again intentionally then regardless of what actually they mean, they will have provocative and inflamatory effect and a chain reaction will start.
And I won't allow that whether it is done by you or someone else.
[This message has been edited by Roman (edited June 17, 1999).]