Re: One bad decision by SC could lead to more trouble
biggest anti molvi , much much bigger then you
...
Then I respectfully ask! Aaap kiss per chalay ga-aay. Kia unhon nain aap ki sahih traiing nah ke?
......
its not my duty to do Pajama talashi .......
Off course! How could one expect that you will be touching a Maulvi sahib in all sorts of places during pajama talashi.
That was just a question assuming if you were to be a police officer standing in front of mosque and eating smosahs. Will you then interrupt your samosah eating routine, and stop a person who looks like your Daada Jaani and do pajama talashi with those oily fingers of yours?
Re: One bad decision by SC could lead to more trouble
Then I respectfully ask! Aaap kiss per chalay ga-aay. Kia unhon nain aap ki sahih traiing nah ke?
he lets us to have our own opinion
in my opinion , only molvis are not wrong today its general behaviour , so i not say some one paticularly that ony he is bad others are good , by saying only molvis are bad means others are good , which is totaly wrong
[quote]
Off course! How could one expect that you will be touching a Maulvi sahib in all sorts of places during pajama talashi.
That was just a question assuming if you were to be a police officer standing in front of mosque and eating smosahs. Will you then interrupt your samosah eating routine, and stop a person who looks like your Daada Jaani and do pajama talashi with those oily fingers of yours?
[/QUOTE]
if a police man donot do his duty for what ever reason , he should be punished otherwise problem will arise
Re: One bad decision by SC could lead to more trouble
so you agree that this is not a responsible thing to do?
good, Thank you for agreeing
PS: ghazi 'shaheed' .. shabash sahee ja rahay ho
PS2: yaar dekho exaggeration is fineand by now predictable, but 60 billion years is a little over the top. :)
Sorry. Just for record, I wanted to edit my post last night and add a few words but forum went down. Edited it now.
The point I am trying to make is, judging SC's decision in terms of responsibleness is a moot point. We r just looking at an affect and jumping all over the place. Nobody wants the masjid to go back to the old administration. But lets hear the govt's alternative plan.
Silence.
Thought so. In such situation, I dont find SC's decision irresponsible at all. If anything, its the govt. that has been irresponsible by first:
Doing a horrible job of the whole operation.
Doing even worse at the court.
Not holding any independent inquiry into the matter which could have pre-empted the SC.
Result is what we see. Plain and simple. Thats all I have to say on this matter.
PS 1: Ur sarcasm detector is low on batteries
PS2: Sure. 60 billion is a bit over the top. How abt 30 billion?
Re: One bad decision by SC could lead to more trouble
you know what is friggin annoyong as hell. they should ave made this a model place, a dignified place, a good madriisa, no extremism, no radicals, yet it has been given in the hands of thuggish jahil ppl again. what a shame.
True!
The govt had been planning to do so as far as I recall, they said theyd make te mosque active and peaceful, make a library, etc. But seems the SC is in such a haste to become heroic these days, nothing matters. :(
Re: One bad decision by SC could lead to more trouble
Lets not call the late mullah Ghazi "Ghazi Shaheed"; that name is used for the famous PNS Ghazi "Shaheed" from 1971.
Though he died for the wrong and avoidable cause, but the man fought till the last minute and died, something that you cant expect from our army which has begun to cowardly surrender to religious nutjobs, thanks to musharraf's exemplery leadership.
Re: One bad decision by SC could lead to more trouble
dont have time to go back read your now edited post and then to edit my response to it :)
apology accepted regardless.
forever indebted.
so in absence of a plan, lets give it back to the militant types? heck keep the dang thing empty.
it was an alternative. Not a good one though. u cant keep the dang thing empty. if the objective was to prevent congregation of similar type of people at the same spot again, the dang thing should've been raised to the ground. Keeping it there to remind terrorists of its availability as a platform..not a good idea.
err no silence here mon ami, cant post something while you are writing it can I? :)
pai je..not only did the govt. remain silent in the court, so have u. I still don't see a workable alternative.
even if we assume
yeah ok. if facts on ground r not enough to convince u of complete administrative failure to prevent and then handle the situation then more power to you sir. If that dont change ur mind, I can never some yoodle on internet will.
that gobt did not handle it right, the supreme court did not handle it right. To say govt did not do teh right thing and thsui supreme court giving it to the extremists is right...is a ridiculous statement.
as ridiculous as jumping on the SC's back for re-opening the mosque and not blanket pardoning the savior for not preventing it in the first place. sure.
only detects good sarcasm :) not jalay bhunnay tanay ;)
a good detector will detect good and bad sarcasm. might wanna look into changing it.