Re: Once Hero and Now Zero
Antiobl: From all your mails on the issue, it seems that you are too much concerned about proliferation, especially accusation that proliferation is done by Pakistan and particularly A Q Khan. Why are you so much concerned? Why it hurts you? Can you please tell us what troubles you about proliferation?
Farid:
[quote]
But don’t you think a person who was responsible for making solid foundation of Nuclear Technology was hanged in fraud murder case and a person who made first nuclear device has been disgraced of corruption, confined even not allowed to meet with his family members, is wrong.
[/quote]
I do not think that you are right in comparing the mishaps of Bhutto and A Q Khan. To me, what happened with A Q Khan was a way of clearing Pakistan of involvement in proliferation. I wish that such should not happen but I think that this is what government of the time thought best way of coming out of the situation. A Q Khan was all over the documents as he was probably the front man in proliferation but I do not think that A Q Khan was acting for his own personal benefit but whatever he was doing, it was for the benefit of the country, as country needed money for the research and missile technology.
[Note: Clearing Pakistan of proliferation at the cost of AQ Khan by present government cannot be considered as done to save some person or group of people, other then Pakistan (from sanctions). Reason being that General Musharaf or others around in the government, none are amongst those who were there when proliferation happened]
As for Z A Bhutto, no doubt that Bhutto played a major role in initiating nuclear program in Pakistan and no one denies that credit to him. Well, nuclear program was already there under ‘Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission’ but Bhutto started Pakistan nuclear program for purpose of making Pakistan nuclear power. But then, one also have to remember that few years after initiating, he was out of power and thus taking the program to its conclusion happened under Zia-ul-Haq (who did not compromised or stalled the program but carried it forward to its ultimate conclusion).
As for hanging of Bhutto, it is nothing to do with nuclear program. The people that followed him kept the program going and did not changed that policy. Thus, one should see hanging of Bhutto according to its own merit.
I believe that many know the reason behind his hanging, though few like to mention that. I cannot put complete blame on Zia alone as Bhutto contributed more towards his fate then anyone else.
What happened?
Firing occurred on PPP dissident, Ahmad Raza Qasuri, but his father, Nawab Mohammad Ahamad Khan Qasuri died.
November 11, 1974: Ahmad Raza Qasuri files First Information Report (FIR) in Lahore, implicating Bhutto in the murder of his father Nawab Mohammad Ahmad Khan.
After taking power, Bhutto started FSF (Federal security force), a paramilitary force, parallel to army and loyal to Bhutto (just like Hitler’s SAS). FSF was directly under the control of Bhutto. Many believe that Bhutto had committed many political murders but there is no concrete proof, as obviously, if he was involved, he was not the one pulling the trigger. FSF (Federal security Force) did all the killings (or torture if that was sufficient) and it is believed that FSF was acting on behalf of Bhutto.
Question arises that when FIR was registered against Bhutto in 1974, why it was not dealt in the court at that time? Why the case stayed suppressed? It is unlikely that Bhutto was unaware of that FIR as Ahmed Raza Qasuri was outspoken critic of Bhutto. It seems that for Bhutto, FIR meant nothing so he did not care. Was Bhutto thinking that being a powerful prime minister, no law could come against him and harm him?
Well, that arrogance cost Bhutto his life. After Bhutto ousted, Bhutto was arrested on Qasuri Murder charge on 3rd of Sept 1977. Before then, he was challenging Zia-ul-Haq martial law in public. Bhutto was making an enemy for himself and then old FIR came in to arrest him (Qasuri again initiated the dormant case).
September 3, 1977: Bhutto is arrested in the murder case of Nawab Mohammad Ahmad Khan Qasuri.
Later, Zia-ul-Haq who till then was promising to hold election in 90 days (starting from coup day, 5th July, 1977) gone back on his words
October 1, 1977: General Zia announces postponement of elections until the "process of accountability has been completed."
The events that unfolded later:
**March 18, 1978: Lahore High Court sentences Bhutto and four FSF officials to death in the murder case of Nawab Mohammad Ahmad Khan Qasuri.
May 6, 1978: Supreme Court begins hearing an appeal against the Lahore High Court verdict against Bhutto.**
**February 6, 1979: Supreme Court, in a majority decision, rejects appeal of Bhutto and four others.
March 25, 1979: Supreme Court rejects a review petition of all the five convicts.
April 1, 1979: President General Ziaul Haq rejects the mercy petition.
April 4, 1979: Bhutto is executed**.
Now, it is debatable that justice was done or was not done. Allah knows best and those who were involved. Regardless, it was Zia that got him hanged or court, one thing is obvious and that is, Bhutto’s arrogance, ignorance and belief of self-importance was also a major factor for him to get hanged.
Politicians should realize that their power comes from people (that includes army). No politician can survive if that politician do not have respect and love amongst the people (including armed forces).
If army general is stronger then the politician [because particular politician is not loved and respected amongst people (including armed forces as those in armed forces are also part of the population)] then if politician are ruling, they are ruling with consent of the generals. If politician has love and respect amongst the people, no general would touch them.
Politicians should be wary about behaving arrogantly or ignorantly. For an army general, if that general is honest and have love/respect in the forces, army would come for his rescue. For politicians, if people do not come out, that politicians can get hanged easily if generals want to.
Politicians have to earn that love and respect amongst the people (just like a general earn that rank over the years and love/respect amongst forces). Sometime politicians earn that respect due to ignorance of the people and sometime their love and respect comes due to party. If politicians are crook and have that love/respect because of ignorance of the people, time comes when they lose all that love and respect (as happening with NS and BB).