When the war between Germany and the USSR started, Communist Party activists were speaking at the gathering in one Chechen village and explaining the Party’s policies on defense of the homeland. After listening to ardent calls of the campaigners to head for the Western Front to defend ‘our land’, one probably politically incorrect old man said, «The size of ‘our land’ over there will not be enough to fit a mouse».
Since the countries that are sending their military to Iraq have no more of ‘their land’ over there than that old man said, that reason why they participate in the aggression against Iraq gets ruled out right away. In the 21st century no one is talking about expansion of living space by conquering new lands or by getting new colonies. Nevertheless, there must be some reason why a big coalition of states attacks another country and invades it.
Threat to use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is a serious reason. And taking irresponsibility of the country’s ruler into account, even the attack on that country can be justified. But it tuned out that there has never been such a threat present, since Iraq never had any WMDs. All right, a mistake was made, a human error, as long as their intentions were correct and good. But some facts are emerging, by which the goodness of intentions has to be doubted, because it’s not the matter of mistake at all, since the organizers of the attack on Iraq new that there was no threat from the very beginning. Then there must be some other reason.
Maybe a threat of terrorism, which is so popular today? But even enemies of Saddam admit that he was not inclined towards international terrorism, except for terrorizing his people maybe. But that’s not the reason to get into an argument with the ‘civilized world’. Uzbek dictator Karimov (Central Asian version of Bokasa) and Pakistani dictator Musharraf are Washington’s allies. Ghaddafi will soon join them too.
So what is the true reason of why half of the Americans and 100 percent of Israelis support the war in Iraq? Hitler, for example, enjoyed support from the population too, but he was saying openly that Germany needed new territories to provide future existence for the German nation. Moral superiority of Hitler before the modern fighters against WMDs and exporters of democracy is pretty noticeable, since the German leader did not use lies to conceal his intentions.
Today’s world leaders, who made up the threat of use WMDs by Iraq or laughable arguments about exporting democracy to Iraq for the good of the Iraqi people, have really set the goals that they cannot tell openly. This is the conclusion that comes to mind because all you can hear is lies, and if there are no other arguments other than lies, then this is the main sign that these goals are unjust.
Actually Iraq could have been posing a threat only to Israel, a US ally. Genetic or mystical fear of Babylon among the Israelis is probably the reason why they wanted to destroy Iraq as soon as possible. The US involvement, which according to the scenario is supposed to get the Iraqi oil as spoils, is logical as well. The problem is that genetic, mystical or whatever other fears evoked among the Jews by Zionist psychics could have been false. A fear of something unknown for no reason would not let them see a potential ally in Saddam.
According to the logic, the enemies of Islam should have known that Saddam Hussein is an enemy of Muslims just like Ariel Sharon is. But after the Zionists started threatening the Palestinian Shaheeds (Martyrs) that their bodies would be wrapped in pigskins, and after they decided to hang pork in buses to scare Palestinian suicide bombers away, some big doubts came up about sanity of the Zionist government of Israel. Only insane people or the ones who know nothing about Islam can seriously believe that manipulations with animal corpses or pieces of pork can mean anything for the bombers who decided to become Shaheeds (Martyrs). Shamanism of the present-day Zionist elite of Israel has been going overboard normal perception or the world around them for quite a while.
It must be assumed that the desire to see the ‘King of Babylon’ cast down as soon as possible belongs to the same series as well. But the result is different from what was expected. Those who should really be feared are coming to replace heathen Saddam. The rule that the results of wars are not always coming from the scenarios of instigators is being confirmed right before our eyes once again.
The main goal of the organizers of the military scam against Iraq, which covers up the main goal of the war – to deal a blow to Islam – was an attempt to drag as many participants into the war as possible and get them stained with blood too. And here is where the symbolic presence of the countries like Poland, Ukraine, Georgia, Japan or Estonia (whom Iraq could not threaten even theoretically), comes from.
When citizens of the small states, members of the anti-Iraqi coalition, hear the news about deaths of their fellow citizens in Iraq, they ask themselves what are they dying in that war for. And here is where the most interesting part starts. ‘Experts’ with Israeli passports start springing up like demons from Pandora’s box. And this is when they start emotionally assuring the locals that this is necessary and that deviating from this course is totally out of the question.
There are no intelligible explanations about why it is needed, because nobody is taking any talks about WMDs and building of democracy seriously. And the things that the rabbis are saying cannot be said among decent public. When first terrorist attacks start happening in these countries, which will be caused by the events in a faraway desert, there will probably be more arguments for the participation in the war. But causes and effects will switch places as usual. The only thing that remains unchanged is that the ones who came to conquer other lands will be called invaders no matter what.
There is a story about how Chechen soldiers were looking over Russian armored vehicles smashed in a blast, and one of them saw a dead body of a Russian invader and asked, «And where is his head?». The other soldier answered, «He never had one. If he did, he wouldn’t have come here in the first place».