Ok People Questions about Aysha.

Before you all jump on your high horses and start patting each other on the back.

Lets' look at the context of the ayat that has been quoted here.

Ayat 33-63, is particularly addressed to the Nasara inviting them to accept the truth revealed in the Qur'aan and to correct their various false notions about Jesus. We also find in this discourse, the Qur'aan completely absolves Jesus and and his mother of the malicious views of the Jews about them and also refutes the erroneous belief of the Nasara regarding the Divinity of Jesus.

The whole issue is dealing with Jesus and the false attributes connected to him:

003.059 The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be". And he was.

003.060 The Truth (comes) from Allah alone; so be not of those who doubt.

003.061 If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: "Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!"

003.062 This is the true account: There is no god except Allah; and Allah-He is indeed the Exalted in Power, the Wise.

003.063 But if they turn back, Allah hath full knowledge of those who do mischief.

003.064 Say: "O People of the Book! come to common terms as between us and you:

That we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah." If then they turn back, say ye: "Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to Allah’s Will).

How you lot can turn around and state that this ayat is confirming the Ahl'Bayt, is beyond belief!

If you are so desperate and cannot confirm the Ahl'Bayt to include Hazrat Ali RA, at least admit it rather than quoting A'Hadeeth instead of the Qur'aan, and worst of all, totally misinterperating the actual ayats.

As far as Wahaabi is concerned, please give me your knowledge on Abdul Wahaab as I have already requested from Pagluu & Co.

What I will do in my next reply is post you information on your sect founding father figure Abdullah Ibn Saba, as it seems as though you have conveniently missed out his credentials.

The fact still remains that Hazrat Ali RA is not mentioned in the Qur'aan as a member of the Ahl'Bayt and the Wives are. But you tend to ignore 98% of the Prophet PBUH's family and only include the select 5, and swear blind alleigance and love for the Ahl'Bayt, when in reality you are desecrating the Ahl'Bayt.

'Before one can commit themselves, they must acknowledge what they are committing themselves too'.

Take heed!

Sholay, Sholay, Sholay

These ayats are from a very important debate in Islamic History.

Before you can actually say that this has little to do with ahle-bait read again.

003.059 The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him: "Be". And he was.

this confirms that Hazrat esa Is not Allahs son

003.060 The Truth (comes) from Allah alone; so be not of those who doubt.

this proves allah has all truth so at no point must anyone doubt it.

003.061 If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: "Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!"

here is where we seem to be stuck. as it says a challenge was issued by allah that
who so ever lies(about Hazrat esa)will be cursed by Allah. So a it says (in Short) bring your family. so if the wives were not Brung that means they were not part of ahle-bait.(if there is an other meaning of Ahle-bait I would like to know)

I already answerd you about the wrong and right about Ahle-bait so If one does WRONG he/she is not Part of AHLE_BAIT and Aysha clearly did wrong(by leaving her house and shouting on the top of her lungs)so in Short I'm sorry my friend she has no right to be considerd a part of Ahle-bait!!

Now answer me this
Did Aysha disobey allah or not?
And if she did was she right or wrong?

if she did and was wrong she is not Ahle-bait!!


When the Lion is Dead, Every Assthinks it can Kick it!!!!

[quote]
Originally posted by Pagluu:
**I dont see anything wrong in discussing this topic here Afia.

sis ramesha has also explained above why this topic is important to be discussed.**
[/quote]

No one is telling reason of asking these question
ramesha has just insisted that this type of discussion is important, but why....?
simply read my questions in previous post and answer please

HA ha.....
Shah Jahan....
You really make me laugh, your answer is totally non-sensical

That Aayah is for whole Ummahs women although the addressees are Prophet's wives and thats Quran's common style. Allah addresses an individual or a group but that order becomes a rule for every Muslim till the day of judgement.

Ok for a sec. suppose that Hadrat Aayesha(Radi Allah an ha) did wrong and came out of her home.....
But she is the wife of that Prophet(peace be upon him) whose Ahl-e-Bait is very respectful to you.
Is that not enough to ignore her if she was wrong somewhere?

Last thing If I say to you oh Shah Jahan Brother.....I really love you your son is like my own son your sister is like my own sister, your family is very nice
but....
I hate your wife she is very bad, i really hate her, she is pathetic
because she doesn't look after your children very well

Shah Jahan if you are a human being you will definately give me a treatement which I will remember for the rest of my life....
or if you are dead dead nice very sweet you will still say to me that it is your family matter if your wife looks after your children or not....Mr Wasir who are you to talk about my wife like that

Brothers think logically and answer logically don't cut n paste long articles.

[quote]
Originally posted by Shah Jahan:
**We also must take into consideration that hazrat Ali was a part of Ahle-bait, he has every rght(if not more)to be in the house than Aysha!!

And i must thank you all for keeping a level head and thank you for not leading this topic astray!!

Wasir,
The Quranic Ayat is ment for the Prophets wives!! It is not ment for my mother or my wife(when I have one)!!
If you give me the ayat on keeping my mother in my house I will follow it to the last word!!

**
[/quote]

If we were to accept the logic behind the original thread and the interperatation of the ayats in Surah Imraan as explained by Shah Jahaan, then surely the ayat testifying to the Wives as Mothers of Believers and the family being purified is INCORRECT.

Furthermore, when the ayat mentions the bringing of sons, women and ourselves, it relates to the communities and not just the Family of each party. If this was the case, then how could Jesus's followers bring the Family of Jesus! The Qur'aan regularly speaks in parables. For instance when Mary is spoken to in the following ayat:

019.028 "O sister of Aaron! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!"

Mary had NO brother named Aaron. Check the chronolgy. So what does this mean!

The nearest you will find of Aaron is the brother of Moses. But Mary shares the same lineage from Isaac.

Anyone who has the faintest idea about the Arabic language will tell you that Arabic has a lot of 'figures of speech'.

Can it be that the Qur'aan made a mistake by saying ALL the Wives are Ahl'Bayt. NO never, therefore the logic of interperatation is WRONG.

Two wrongs do not make a right.

Therefore, if Hazrat Ai'Shaa RA was wrong in leaving the house, then Hazrat Ali RA was also wrong in NOT treating her as a Mother of Believers and dealing with here without a screen.

See yah later Sholay

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/hehe.gif

Ali is not mentioned in this verse.

" Let us summon our children and your children."

This verse ends at that.

It is the explanation that mentions Ali. That is, its true that the Prophet PBUH summoned Ali as a result of this verse.

However, Ali is indirectly mentioned in other places in the Quran, see http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/Forum13/HTML/003172.html

Exactly as I had suspected.

Not one answer to my query. All speculations and individual false interperations.

As the saying goes 'clutching at straws'.

For centuries, people like you have been claiming the undying love for the Ahl'Bayt, but when asked to prove who and how they were. Everyone single respondent fell to pieces.

I know full well Hazrat Ali RA is a member of Ahl'Bayt, but a simple Litmus Test was put to you, and not one conclusive answer.

But when you are told in clear terms about the Wives as being Ahl'Bayt, you decide not to accept.

Truly the gift of Choice is remarkable.

As usual, I have to do your job for you and here is the confirmation that none of you could disclose:

033.006 The Prophet is closer to the Believers than their own selves, and his wives are their mothers. Blood-relations among each other have closer personal ties, in the Decree of Allah. Than (the Brotherhood of) Believers and Muhajirs: nevertheless do ye what is just to your closest friends: such is the writing in the Decree (of Allah).

The actual answer is in the above ayat.

Firstly, Hazrat Ali RA is a BLOOD relative and

Secondly, when you marry someone, you automatically become a member of a household.

That is the only way a FAMILY can commence and continue. Through marriage.

The difference between me and you is that I NEVER defile the Ahl'Bayt like yourselves, and I also accept the full family as Ahl'Bayt and NOT a selected 5!

Next time you decide to defile members of the Ahl'Bayt, remember the following ayat:

033.055 There is no blame (on these ladies if they appear) before their fathers or their sons, their brothers, or their brother’s sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the (slaves) whom their right hands possess. And, (ladies), fear Allah; for Allah is Witness to all things.

033.056 Allah and His angels send blessings on the Prophet: O ye that believe! Send ye blessings on him, and salute him with all respect.

033.057 Those who annoy Allah and His Apostle - Allah has cursed them in this World and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment.

Take heed.

End of case!

this topic has been debated several times here.... the problem relies in faith... its clear that shias declare prophet of family as super human and even above other messengers of God ,who cant make a mistake where as others including me believe that only messengers of God r masoom... though all Sahabas and family of Prophet tried to follow Sunnah of prophet and didnt made intentional mistakes which regard to this world and doesnt to religion of Islam... but since all thesee humans they were sorrounded by misunderstandings as is normal in human nature...
Hazrat Ali (R.A) and Hazrat Ayesha were both humans... Hazrat Ali though being the knowledgeable and great muslim did made unintentional mistakes by allowing kharjites in his camp who abbondanoed him and even killed him later..
so if we r not going to believe any person as super- human then its a matter of faith and no argument against faith...
we should always learn from mistakes and try to remove misunderstandings rather than killing again each other after so many years remembering same things...

[quote]
Originally posted by Shah Jahan:

003.061 If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge Hath come to thee, say: "Come! let us gather together,- our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: Then let us earnestly pray, and invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie!"

here is where we seem to be stuck. as it says a challenge was issued by allah that
who so ever lies(about Hazrat esa)will be cursed by Allah.** So a it says (in Short) bring your family.** so if the wives were not Brung that means they were not part of ahle-bait.(if there is an other meaning of Ahle-bait I would like to know)

[/quote]

Huh!!!

I am not a learned person and never participate here.. But a few questions just for my knowledge.

Its says ppl who belie Hazrat esa (pbuh) will be cursed...right?

How does it say "Bring your family" in there??

I dont know how either of you connected that to anyone. Its doesnt mention Daughters even, nor cousins or son in laws or wives.

It says sons women and yurlself. Now in any language, a persons woman is his wife..no?.... even then what does it prove?


ICBM Target Coords: 27.500S, 153.017E

[This message has been edited by who---me (edited July 07, 2001).]

sholay,

coming back to what you had said a few days back...that aisha(ra) had made a mistake by going to war then so did ali(AS) make a mistake by seeing her behind a veil.

she can go to war, fine...but whether or not she wears clothes is her responsibility or ali's(as)

and think about it...she would not have left the house without naqab.


"There as many ideas in the minds of men and women as there are stars in the sky, it is your job to hold on to one and make it come true"
Anonymous

[quote]
Originally posted by ramesha:
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) also married the daughter of Abu Sufiyan, Umme Habibi, the biggest enemy of Islam. You cant just say Ayesha was good because she was prophet's wife.
[/quote]

Salaam Sis Ramesha,
I may be incorrect in my interpretation of your words, but it appears that you imply that because Umm Habiba (ra) was the the daughter of a man who fought against Islam, by default she could not be considered to be a good person, despite being the Prophet's (SAWS) wife. I do not wish to be drawn into another sectarian fight over the status of Aisha (ra), but I am shocked at what I perceive as an attack on Umm Habiba (ra), as I have never seen anyone do this before.

The flaw with your argument that immediately strikes me is that you base your argument against Umm Habiba (ra) on the case that because her father fought against Islam, she could not be considered to be good. I would like to contest this claim.

The Quran makes it clear that we are all responsible for are own actions, and that we are not punished for what our forefathers did. This is what removes the Christian concept or original sin from Islam. Just because Umm Habiba's father was evil is not sufficient grounds to declare her to be evil. Indeed, if one looks at her life you can see that she could not possibly be more different from her father. Umm Habiba (ra) and her husband entered Islam together after hearing the message of the Prophet (SAWS). Later when her husband emigrated to Abysinnia, she accompanied him as a loyal wife. However, there her husband became Christian, whereas she refused too do so; an action that dissolved her marriage. She quickly went from being the daughter of a wealthy family to being a poor, single mother-of-one in a strange land. However, she never compromised on Islam dispite her adverse situation, living with her young daughter secluded from men. After several years, the Prophet (SAWS) heard of her circumstance and sent a messenger to propose marriage. His marriage to her shows that the sins of the parents are not visited upon the children. Her father being evil did not mean she was the same. To the contrary, she was outstandingly a good muslim, thus a good person, and thus fit to be the Prophet's wife.

Salaam bro Mad_scientist,

I think i was very wrong in my word selection there. My intentions were not to degrade Hazrat bibi Umme Habibi (as) by any mean. My main two aims were as follows:

a) Prophet married to most of the azdawaaj due to political reasons (to bring the tribes coloser etc)
b)I’ve alos seen few sunni brothers making this a daleel to prove how Hazrath Abu Bakar was dear to hazoor.

That was all i meant to say. Sorry if i was wrong with my wordings or you precieved them wrongly.

As far as the rest of the argument is concerned, both history and hadiths (shia/sunni) testifies who Ahlay Bayt (as) are, there is no point in arguing over that.

Salaam
ramesha

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/smile.gif

History and A'Hadeeth DO NOT override the status of the Qur'aan.

The Primary source for all queries, IS the Qur'aan.

So, if the Qur'aan has made it abundantly clear, concerning the Ahl'Bayt, then noone can dispute this fact.

However, if individuals want to totally ignore the ayats and put A'Hadeeth and History before the Qur'aan for Political Gain, then so be it.

This is why we have been given the best gift of all. CHOICE.

We can CHOOSE to accept or decline!

And Abdullah Ibn Saba decided to decline.

Who is Abdullah Ibn Saba ? I notice that his name is mention few time.

[quote]
Originally posted by sholay:
**
History and A'Hadeeth DO NOT override the status of the Qur'aan.

The Primary source for all queries, IS the Qur'aan.

So, if the Qur'aan has made it abundantly clear, concerning the Ahl'Bayt, then noone can dispute this fact.

However, if individuals want to totally ignore the ayats and put A'Hadeeth and History before the Qur'aan for Political Gain, then so be it.

This is why we have been given the best gift of all. CHOICE.

We can CHOOSE to accept or decline!

And Abdullah Ibn Saba decided to decline.

**
[/quote]

Mr Sholay, I have learned normally not to interact with indivisuals like you but you seem worse than Watcher who used to visit here. You know why? because he showed his hate for the Rasool Allah's family openly and you've decided to do it a real hypocrite way.
Ahlul Bayt (as) are:
Imam Ali (as)
Bibi Fatima (as)
Imam Hasan (as)
Imam Hussein (as)

They got to this status because they were great enough to get there. By rejecting this you may be getting yourself little happines before you die but you are also being a way to lead astray others. By including the wives in the Ahlul Bayt, you are clearly jeopardising not only the greatest of the sunni hadith books but also the great Holy book of Allah, the Quran.

There is no point in arguing with you from either Quran or hadith.
Hadiths you totally reject (very common from your creed). Quranic ayats that fret your faith you say are "out of the context".

Islam is a deen that passed through 124,000 Prophets, it came bit by bit, imagine a jigsaw each Prophet brought a piece of the puzzle, starting with Hadhrath Adam (as) until the final piece of the puzzle came in to the hand of Hadhrath Muhammad (saws). This role of Prophethood was explained beautifully by the Prophet (saws) himself:

“My relation to the long chain of Prophets can be understood by the parable of a Palace. The Palace was most beautifully built. Everything was complete therein except the place for one brick. I have filled in that place and now the Palace has been completed”.
Towards understanding Islam by Sayyid Abu’l Ala Maudoodi, page 49 Editors footnote quoting Sahih Bukhari and Muslim (Islamic Foundation publishers)

The completion of the Palace symbolizes the completion of Allah’s deen, Islam. Whilst there is no doubting that Hadhrath Muhammad (s) is the final messenger, was there still not a risk of individuals seeking to unlawfully enter the Palace, occupy it, rearrange its fabric or worse still, attack its foundations?

If we have learnt anything from past peoples, it is that whilst every Prophet brought a brick towards the building of the Palace, after their deaths their teachings were corrupted, many had became unrecognizable. It is therefore little surprise that the Prophet (s) warned his companions that his adherents would follow the way of previous nations, so much so “that even if they entered a hole of a mastigure (lizard), you would follow them”(2). When Hadhrath Muhammad (s) was the Last Messenger, is not logical that Allah (swt) in his infinite wisdom would appoint guardians to the Palace to ensure that his deen is protected from corruption?
Sahih al Bukhari Arabic-English, Volume 9 hadith number 422

Some people assert that this guardianship has been provided for via the Qur’an, this clearly is not the case, there is no standard commentary of the Qur’an, that all Muslims accept. Islam is divided into many Sects, all of which purport to rely on the Qur’an, they present differing interpretations of verses, based upon theological schools of affiliation. The Qur’an is helpless on it’s own as it is a silent Book, it cannot physically guide its words of wisdom will only go so far as beacons of guidance without a living Guide to bring them alive in the hearts of the believers. It is dependent on a teacher, a correct interpreter.

During the lifetime of the companions, the Holy Prophet (s) was the Practical Guide to the inner and outer meanings of the Qur’an, with his death did this type of guidance end? Clearly the need for guidance would have been much more necessary for future generations that had never benefited from the Prophet (s)’s company. Some people assert that the companions fulfilled this role of guidance. This contention is not supported by hadith, for the Prophet (s) had warned the companions not to become kaffirs by killing each other.
ibid, Volume 9 hadith number 198 - 200

He (s) also said that afflictions would fall on to their homes in the same way that rain drops fall(1) and that some would become apostates after him(2) with the majority perishing in the fire(3).
1. ibid, Volume 9 hadith number 182
2. ibid, Volume 8 hadith number 586
3. ibid, Volume 8 hadith number 587

In the same way that a Doctor after identifying a condition prescribes medication for his patient, the Prophet (s) had likewise told the companions where they should turn to for guidance. During his farewell sermon at Arafat he (s) declared “I am leaving you two weighty things, if you follow them you will never go astray, they are the Qur’an and my Ahlul'bayt”.
Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, page 662-663

The sermon was announced to the Companions, thus proving that even they were liable of going astray if they turned away from these two sources. Those Muslims, that have clung to these two sources as an eternal form of guidance are called the ‘Shi’a’ (partisans), defined by the Sunni scholar Ibn Manzur, as “those people who love what the Prophet's Progeny loves, and they are loyal to such Progeny”.
Lisan al-'Arab, by Ibn Manzur, vol. 8, p189

We consider the Ahl’ulbayt as the designated guides appointed by Allah (swt). While past Khalifas were in positions of power, they did not inherit the knowledge, position and wisdom of the Holy Prophet, who specifically told the companions that Hadhrath Ali (as) had inherited the Qur’an and Sunnah from him.
Riyadh al Nadira, by Mohibbudin al Tabari, Vol 3 p 123

The inheritance of religious guidance passed through 12 designated Imams from Ahl’ulbayt, there are numerous hadith where the Prophet (s) declared that Islam would remain intact until the passing of 12 khalifas.
Mishkat al Masabih: (Vol 4 p 576), Hadith 5

The number 12 is of significance here, it can not apply to political leadership since the number of khalifas at the helm of the Khilafah far exceeded 12. The Prophet (s) was not talking about leaders appointed by men he was talking about absolute religious guides appointed by Allah (swt) and the Prophet (s) declared that in every generation members of his Ahl’ulbayt would counteract attempts to alter and corrupt the religion.
al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar, Ch. 11, section 1, p231 under the commentary of verse: “And stop them, for they shall be questioned [37:24]”

This fact is strengthened further by the hadith recorded by the recognized Sunni scholar Al-Juwayni is in which the Prophet said that he would have 12 successors the first being Imam Ali, the last being Imam Mahdi.
Fara'id al-Simtayn, pg 160

As for the Shi’a of the Ahl’ul bayt, numerous Sunni scholars have recorded hadith in which the Prophet (s) had said that the group that Allah (swt) describes as “the best of the creatures” (Qur’an 98:7)” are Ali and his Shi’a and that they will enter paradise.
1. Tafsir Ibne Jarir, Volume 33 page 146 (Cairo edition) narrated from Hadhrath Muhammad bin Ali (as)
2. Tafsir Durre Manthur by Jalaladeen Suyuti, in his commentary of verse 98:7 Volume 6 page 379 –3 separate chains.
3. Tafsir Fatha ul bayan Volume 10 page 333 (Egypt edition)

If the Prophet (s)’s said the best of creations are Hadhrath Ali (as) and his Shi’a, then in the same way that this verse is applicable until the end of the world, Ali (as)’s Shi’a will likewise exist to provide a practical commentary to it. The Ahl’ul Sunnah believe that 70,000 Muslims will enter paradise without answering any questions(1) and Anas bin Malik, narrates that the Prophet (s) said that the 70,000 were Ali and his Shi’a(2).
1. Islam: The Basic Articles of Faith - According to the Beliefs of the Ahl al Sunna wa al Jama’a - a Modern English translation of Bahar-e-Shariat Part One (Unnamed author) page 67 – quoting a hadith to this effect.
2. Manaqib Ali al Murtaza, page 184 by al Maghazli (An ancient Shafi scholar)

There are no traditions, in which the Prophet (s) guaranteed paradise for any other companion and his followers. These hadith prove that the Shi’a were not a Sect founded by fictitious Abdullah bin Saba but were adherents to Ali (as) who existed during the lifetime of the Prophet (s).

The Shi’a have despite centuries of persecution and false propaganda maintained their affiliation with the Imams from the Ahl’ul bayt clinging to the “two weighty things” – seeking solace in the guarantee of the Holy Prophet (s): “Recognition of the family of Muhammad is freedom from the Fire. Love of the family of Muhammad is crossing over the Sirat. Friendship for the family of Muhammad is safety from the fire”.
1. Ash-Shifa, page 142 by Qadi Iyad, (d.544 Hijri) English translation by Aisha Bewley, Madinah Press 1991.
2. Yanabi al-Mawaddah, al-Qundoozi al-Hanafi, section 65, p370

With such a clear hadith it is little surprise that the Prophet (s) declared: “O Ali four people will enter heaven first of all. Me, you, Hasan, Hussain and your descendents will follow us and our wives will follow our descendents and our Shi’a will be to the left and right of us”.
al Sawaiqh al Muhriqa page 159, by Ahmad ibn Hajr al Makki (Cairo edition)

These hadith need to be pondered over carefully remember, the Prophet (s) said in a well known hadith that Muslims would be divided in to 73 sects of which only one would attain paradise, one hopes that this article has been able to shed light on which group that is.

I will not waste any further time of anyone of you. Truth is out there. Atleast try searching for it!

Salaam and God Bless.

[This message has been edited by ramesha (edited July 08, 2001).]

ramesha why are u wasting ur time? u gave them facts after facts ..yet they wont get it ever..forget them

i say aysha was the worst of all...she is a 'gaali'

how come no sunni girl member has replied to this topic...thanks ramesha...see what bibi fatima(as) has taught her?!


"There as many ideas in the minds of men and women as there are stars in the sky, it is your job to hold on to one and make it come true"
Anonymous

[quote]
Originally posted by Ahl_e_Sunnah:
**how come no sunni girl member has replied to this topic...thanks ramesha...see what bibi fatima(as) has taught her?!

**
[/quote]

dear neither has any shia girl replied..if u understand ..wuz going on here...
same thing happened few months back here when a shia guty who used to say disrespect to shahba karam . was seconded by few girls.. but was soon caught having multiple nicks and was banned.. so he was trying to preach religion here but was based on jhoot and fraud...

plus if u wanna know how all people think of shais bashing and cursing of Sahaba Ikram come to chat where all males and females have told me how they left visiting religion forum..
just read Sheraz reply above..u will know people auqat.. and mentality and upbringing...