Nukes in the US?

Looks like all hell is going to break loose if there is any truth in this book report.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/7/13/171536.shtml

A new book written by a former FBI consultant claims that al-Qaida not only has obtained nuclear devices, but also likely has them in the U.S. and will detonate them in the near future.

These chilling allegations appear in “Osama’s Revenge: The Next 9/11: What the Media and the Government Haven’t Told You,” by Paul L. Williams (Prometheus Books).
Williams claims that al-Qaida has been planning a spectacular nuclear attack using six or seven suitcase nuclear bombs that would be detonated simulantaneously in U.S. cities.

“They want the most bang for the buck, and that is nuclear,” Williams told NewsMax.

“I expect such an attack would come between now and the end of 2005,” the author said.

In addition to writing several books on terrorism, Williams, an investigative journalist, has worked as an FBI consultant.

Williams’ contention is not far from what U.S. intelligence believes, a source close to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge has told NewsMax. The source said Ridge claimed that U.S. intelligence believes terrorists already have smuggled into the U.S. actual atomic devices, as opposed to so-called “dirty nukes” that simply are conventional bombs that help spread radiation.

The Bush administration has warned for years that terrorists pose a nuclear threat to America.

Williams’ book presents a review of the increasing spread of nuclear weapons technology, which the author says can be traced to India’s nuclear tests in the early 1970s. It accelerated when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.

Shortly after the Indian nuclear tests, Pakistan made an all-out effort to join the nuclear club, the author says. Islamabad received help from sympathetic nations, namely China and North Korea.

Williams traces the rampant spread of nuclear bomb development to a leading Pakistani scientist, Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Khan, described as an “Islamic extremist,” also has been depicted by former CIA chief George Tenet as “the father of Pakistan’s nuclear program.”

It is believed the Pakistani gained his expertise while working in the Netherlands, where he allegedly stole technology used in uranium reprocessing, a key procedure for building an atomic bomb.

Pakistan successfully detonated two nuclear weapons inside a northern mountain range in the late 1990s.

Khan, arrested by Pakistani police in February under White House pressure, admitted selling nuclear technology to numerous foreign countries, including North Korea and Libya.

Williams reports that Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was investigating Khan at the time he was kidnapped and later killed in 2003.

Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, fearing a backlash from radical Muslims, granted Khan a pardon but restricted his travels.

According to Williams, another beneficiary of Khan’s “contacts” was al-Qaida. The author reports that the U.S. got its first “hard” evidence of a connection when it invaded the Afghan capital of Kabul in 2001.

A former al-Qaida safe house was found to be loaded with documents detailing dealings with the Pakistani scientist.

The finding was so serious, says Williams, that Tenet traveled to Afghanistan and Pakistan to follow up on the discovery.

Tenet: ‘They Are Coming’

Perhaps it was such intelligence that led Tenet to say in October 2002: “The threat environment we face is as bad as it was before September 11. It is serious. They have reconstituted. They are coming after us.”

Almost from the moment 9/11 happened, the U.S. has been on a heightened state of alert and worry over the possible use of nuclear weapons. On the day of the attack, President Bush left Florida and began criss-crossing the country in Air Force One in maneuvers consistent with a president preparing for a nuclear attack.

Shortly after Sept. 11, Taliban leader Mullah Omar claimed to the BBC that the main intent of al-Qaida was the “bigger cause,” which he described as the “destruction of America.”

Asked pointedly if this meant the use of nuclear weapons againt the U.S., he responded: “This is not a matter of weapons. We are hopeful for God’s help. The real matter is the extinction of America. And, God willing, it will fall to the ground.”

Omar cryptically suggested that a nuclear plan was already under way at the time of Sept. 11.

He said: “The plan is going ahead and, God willing, it is being implemented. But it is a huge task, which is beyond the will and comprehension of human beings. If God’s help is with us, this will happen within a short period of time; keep in mind this prediction.”…

I am pretty convinced when I write this that if such an attack ever happened in the US. We would bitch slap every country ever connected to or affiliated with islamic extremism. The response would be so large and massive that Afghanistan would look like the NFL Pro Bowl.

Bitch slap is what Ike used to do to Tina. World War III would more describe the US response to a nuclear attack.

So much for the anti-terrorist measures of the Bush Administration. So the billions of dollars spent in the Afghan/Iraq war not to mention the casualties, were all for naught? Tsk tsk.

Undoubtly containing loose nukes should be the top priority for the U.S. as well as the world community. More needs to be done and the ball on this issue has been dropped and needs not only to be picked up but picked up and run with.

[QUOTE]
Bitch slap is what Ike used to do to Tina. World War III would more describe the US response to a nuclear attack.
[/QUOTE]

While others pretend like they didn't read this...I have to ask...Seminole who is Tina?

Ike and Tina Turner. Ike was the husband of Tina Turner and used to abuse her until she ditched him and became more famous.

Re: Nukes in the US?

[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Surya: *
Looks like all hell is going to break loose if there is any truth in this book report.
..........
*
Pakistan successfully detonated two nuclear weapons inside a northern mountain range in the late 1990s.**
......
[/QUOTE]
The whole concept is as legitimate as this statement.