Where is all the morality and equility arugument gone when Musharaf and Nawaz Sharif struck adeal of 10 yeras nad he was sent abroad with all the wealth?
Main argument against NRO is that all citizens of pakistan should be treated equally - while ordinary prisoners languish in jails big fishes avoid trials nad jails.. how did Nawaz Sharf who was at that time accused and serving a sentence was taken out of jail while millions ordinary people were in jail.. Why didnt CJ Iftikhar didnt took any notice then? or even now?
as expected, ur answer to everything in the universe is Zardari.. there r three persons most obsessed with Zardari, u, Akram A Sheikh and Ansar Abbasi.. what a love triangle!
as expected, ur answer to everything in the universe is Zardari.. there r three persons most obsessed with Zardari, u, Akram A Sheikh and Ansar Abbasi.. what a love triangle!
Please include me also in the list. I am sure a lot of others in the forum would also like to be a part of Zardari bashing team.
As long as he continues to show no morality, by hiding his criminalities behind Presidential immunity, may be he can fool you but a lot of people believe that if he is so much morally upright as you claim, he should answer atleast his source of income from where he acquired such a huge fortune.
Re: NRO-1
^ please read my original post and see from where zardari fits in here!
^ please read my original post and see from where zardari fits in here!
As far as I am concerned I am sick of this argument. Whenever Jiyalas are asked about Zardari's corruption, they start to counter the argument that why Nawaz Sharif is not being investigated. Who has to investigate the crimes of Nawaz Sharif? Who is in the government? Why don't they open the investigations about the wealth of Nawaz Sharif? Why don't they ask him about the source of his wealth?
Why don't they present some credible evidence in front of Iftikhar Chaudry so that the CJ can put NS behind the bars forever? Who is in control of investigating agencies? OK Musharraf did not investigate NS crimes, who is stopping the government now?
As far as Zardari is concerned he already has evidence against him, which he does not want to face in a court of law and wants to hide behind the presidential immunity!
As far as I am concerned I am sick of this argument. Whenever Jiyalas are asked about Zardari's corruption, they start to counter the argument that why Nawaz Sharif is not being investigated. Who has to investigate the crimes of Nawaz Sharif? Who is in the government? Why don't they open the investigations about the wealth of Nawaz Sharif? Why don't they ask him about the source of his wealth?
Why don't they present some credible evidence in front of Iftikhar Chaudry so that the CJ can put NS behind the bars forever? Who is in control of investigating agencies? OK Musharraf did not investigate NS crimes, who is stopping the government now?
ZARDARI!!!
Re: NRO-1
And who would ask about CJ crime in justifying Musharaf rule in Pakistan? Why dont be hang few Judges?
Re: NRO-1
Its CJ who was involved ... That was the reason he dont talk about 1999 coup but gave Nov 3 PCO as against constitution.. It is so strage that original military coup of 1999 has not been termed as illigal in Pakistan? The reason is present judiciary is also caught in the crime..
Its CJ who was involved ... That was the reason he dont talk about 1999 coup but gave Nov 3 PCO as against constitution.. It is so strage that original military coup of 1999 has not been termed as illigal in Pakistan? The reason is present judiciary is also caught in the crime..
Who was CJ in 1999...
Stop accusing others to hide your crime... anyone who does that certainly shows childish behaviour....
Instead of arguing, go and file a petition....i'll ask the same question MindStorm asked, who is stopping govt from doing all this investigation??? the answer is ZARDARI...
And who would ask about CJ crime in justifying Musharaf rule in Pakistan? Why dont be hang few Judges?
There is a law in the country, let's support strictly the law. If you want to ask question from someone why Musharraf was not tried for his crimes of 1999, please ask the representatives you elected in 2002 who gave legal protection to the 1999 acts. Please complain your elected representatives of 2002 who passed 17th ammendments giving these judges a clean slate.
As far as his illegal acts of 2007, judges have already given a verdict against them. It is up to the government to start legal proceedings against Musharraf as only they have the legal right to do that. Please ask your elected government to open cases against Musharraf.
Re: NRO-1
The why not strike down 17th amendment bu CJ as it seems it is against the constitution? If they can do so for NRO then why not 17th amendment.
In ur argument the only crime Musharaf made was in Nov 2007? CJ Iftikhar who was justice at that time allowed Musharaf to make changes to constitution as he may wished for.. tkk PCO twice but now has disallowed PCO by Dogar in judgement of July 2009. How can he or other judges have double standards..
T*he why not strike down 17th amendment bu CJ as it seems it is against the constitution? If they can do so for NRO then why not 17th amendment.*
In ur argument the only crime Musharaf made was in Nov 2007? CJ Iftikhar who was justice at that time allowed Musharaf to make changes to constitution as he may wished for.. tkk PCO twice but now has disallowed PCO by Dogar in judgement of July 2009. How can he or other judges have double standards..
What are you smoking dude... those black bakras are having some effect on peoples mind.. isn't it?
17th Amendment was made a law and part of constitution by the parliament of Pakistan and NRO was issued by a president and got no backing of the Parliament, and in its essence it was against the Constitution of Pakistan.. Now did you get the point ur still everything is blank....
Re: NRO-1
I am saying Musharaf was given a right to change teh constitution itself for three whole years by CJ Iftikhar and others in 1999 - and thats a big crime! It imposed martial on the country for 8 long years.. now only politicians are asked for their past crimes and not judiaciary as they have been cleaned for no reason...
I am saying Musharaf was given a right to change teh constitution itself for three whole years by CJ Iftikhar and others in 1999 - and thats a big crime! It imposed martial on the country for 8 long years.. now only politicians are asked for their past crimes and not judiaciary as they have been cleaned for no reason...
What part you didn't get... It is already said above that (Not by me though) This was backed by the Parliament where PPP was also present...
Re: NRO-1
Going back to topic in the post - why was Nazwaz Sharif taken out of jail when he was sentenced in a crime- stuck a deal with Musharaf and escaped Pakistan. It is the same case as NRO as only one section of society was given preferencial treatment.. why didny CJ Iftikhar noted that in the NRO verdict.. answer is simple he was himself involved and closed his eyes..
What part you didn't get... It is already said above that (Not by me though) This was backed by the Parliament where PPP was also present...
Parliament backed it after 3 years.. I am talking about those 3 yeras.. same Nov 3 2008 emergency could had been backed by present parliament in say 3 years..
Law is only when it suits someone and there r double standards..
Parliament backed it after 3 years.. I am talking about those 3 yeras.. same Nov 3 2008 emergency could had been backed by present parliament in say 3 years..
Law is only when it suits someone and there r double standards..
Bakras are having some serious effect on the minds of people...don't u think so!!!
Re: NRO-1
Supreme court had said it could even strike down NRO even if parliament makes it a part of constitution if it cklashes with human rights... why cant they strike out 17 amendement then if it is against the constitution?
Bakras are having some serious effect on the minds of people...don't u think so!!!
Ur views are only shared by few anchors that were bought and few laywers.. whereas, sadly for you Zardari is supportyed by 2/3 of elected representatives of pakistan and the biggest party in pakistan.. ur hatred against PPP cannot change the truth..