Noticing a pattern/ trend

[Southie]

Re: Noticing a pattern/ trend

Dear Jinx

First I would like to reiterate LKK and you have always been polite. Have not implied you are not. As for whay you stated you may want to see Shak post 2 where he quoted you. See 2nd para. You givecnon Muslims a choice. Since you advocate Islamic law, you have given atheists no choice. And yes - you did call them a cry baby for nit willing to accept Islamic law. You have sanitized below what you stated.

To be clear, bao bihari advocated Islamic law on everyone. You clarified non Muslims can have their own law. But athiests have no choice and should not be cry babies. For verification folks can go to PA What kind of Pakistan do you wish for and read posts ~ 360 to 370. God I wish I was smart enough to paste those posts here.

Anyway I appreciate the opportunity to clarify - and appreciate the thread - closed by Shak - has been reopened.

I will state I can learn being polite from LKK and you. Even if I don’t agree with your views :). To me this is positive. I got to express my concern. And I have no doubt outcome will be positive.

@The_Jinx

Ok Southie, I will tell you my views with different approach so that your twisting of my opinion is evident and next time you do not end up putting your pre conceived notions down in someone else’s throat, theek?

That’s not what I said.

As Shak has already quoted my exact words, your paraphrasing is simply taking my point out of context.

I essentially said, if Islamic law is law of land, then, athiest should have no problem accepting it as the law of the land since religion does not matter to them so it should not matter if the law came from religious rulings or from man-made legislature.

What I said in regards to Islamic law being imposed on non-muslims was actually the point, where I said:

1. Islamic law dictates that non-muslims have option to choose either their religious ruling or Islamic ruling.

2. In the very context, atheists don’t have a choice to pick a law of their liking. They have to accept law of land which
   r happens to be in this example, Islamic Law.

What’s wrong with that understanding?