he desreves noble prize for defusing the situation in south asia.
At the regional level, it was solely because of the mature, balanced and rational approach adopted by the General that almost a sure war between two South Asian nuclear rivals has been averted. Musharraf went extra mile in defusing volatile situation in the region even at great personal risks at home by offering some of the bitter concessions to India
I think he may be nominated for the noble prize. But the noble prize committe is not the last thing in the world as they ignored many deserving people including Einstein for his theory of relativity. And they later felt sorry awarding the prize to some Israeli guy for peace in which Arafat shared the prize too. :)
In fact, General Musharraf’s untiring efforts for regional peace have won him a sizeable number of supporters in India as well, as was demonstrated on the occasion of his historic Agra visit.
Re: nobel prize for musharuff
…yeah and for stabbing India on the back with Kargil…
Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *
...yeah and for stabbing India on the back with Kargil.....
[/QUOTE]
Correction:
He wasn't head of state during Kargil.
Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Correction:
He wasn't head of state during Kargil.
[/QUOTE]
he sure wasnt but he failed to inform the head of state and acted on his own!
Re: Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Bilal_Tarar: *
he sure wasnt but he failed to inform the head of state and acted on his own!
[/QUOTE]
and you believe this BS from NAWAZ ?
Dear every single politician has "loyal" general(s) in the GHQ who actually give every minute report to the politicians. This is not possible that this big of a thing happend without the knowledge of NAWAZ.
Its like "Dog eat my homework" excuse.
and 2nd thing i cant understand is yee sub ko dosroon kee ghaltiaan Iqdaar say baher kick honey k baad hee keyun yaad aatee heen? If nawaz was not informed (just for sake of argumet assume for a sec) he should have kicked Musharraf out of office but he appointed him chief for the next term. Kia hota ziada say ziada Nawaz ko dismiss ker deya jata awam tu uss k saath hotey like he happend once before. But nah all NAWAZ wanted to stick to power chhey is k leyee koi bhee agreement kerna parey. Basically all politicians are losers.
sure sure...give him the nobel but if you wanna be fair about it, he should share it with Osama, Ariel Sharon! these three together have done more to reduce load on planet earth !
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nakhrey Wali: *
and you believe this BS from NAWAZ ?
Dear every single politician has "loyal" general(s) in the GHQ who actually give every minute report to the politicians. This is not possible that this big of a thing happend without the knowledge of NAWAZ.
Its like "Dog eat my homework" excuse.
and 2nd thing i cant understand is yee sub ko dosroon kee ghaltiaan Iqdaar say baher kick honey k baad hee keyun yaad aatee heen? If nawaz was not informed (just for sake of argumet assume for a sec) he should have kicked Musharraf out of office but he appointed him chief for the next term. Kia hota ziada say ziada Nawaz ko dismiss ker deya jata awam tu uss k saath hotey like he happend once before. But nah all NAWAZ wanted to stick to power chhey is k leyee koi bhee agreement kerna parey. Basically all politicians are losers.
[/QUOTE]
dear....Nawaz wasnt the head of the state....Rafiq Tarar was!!
Iqtidaar se jaane ke baad koi ghaltee yaad nahi aayi!
In Pakistan....it doesnt matter who the awaam is with....it onyl matters who the generals are with!!
stick to power???!?!?!
thats exactly wht musharraf is tryna do now....by bringing in luteras like Shujaat who have looted the paki people!!
n musharraf took an oath wen he joined the army which stated that he wud never take part in an political activity 'what so ever'....n the 22nd grade officer has become the president of Paki.....whos tryna hold onto power?!?!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Bilal_Tarar: *
dear....Nawaz wasnt the head of the state....Rafiq Tarar was!!
Iqtidaar se jaane ke baad koi ghaltee yaad nahi aayi!
In Pakistan....it doesnt matter who the awaam is with....it onyl matters who the generals are with!!
stick to power???!?!?!
thats exactly wht musharraf is tryna do now....by bringing in luteras like Shujaat who have looted the paki people!!
n musharraf took an oath wen he joined the army which stated that he wud never take part in an political activity 'what so ever'....n the 22nd grade officer has become the president of Paki.....whos tryna hold onto power?!?!
[/QUOTE]
You name ONE naik, shareef, deyanat daar and loyal Politician :)
Shahbaz Sharif!
n btw....if Musharraf can plan a coup without the PM knowin until all the plannin in complete....why cant he engineer the Kargil thing?!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
Yeah Tarar was the head of the state, who can’t even dismissed the Parliament.
politicians dont have to be naik to serve the nation sincerely....Musharraf is a sharabi n probably the most hor.ny guy in Pakistan....u call that naik?!?!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
yea…he had no real powers…!!!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Bilal_Tarar: *
.Musharraf is a sharabi
[/quote]
Did you pay a lap dance for him? :p
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: nobel prize for musharuff
Yeah, Tarar had no real powers.
Now, we’re talking.
Despite of Democracy, President had no powers. Pathetic!
You are made to believe PM wasn’t inform about Kargil.
Here’s the pic of Musharraf and Nawaz during Kargil conflict.
http://www.gupistan.com/gallery/1/shakehand.gif
Try denying that 
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Bilal_Tarar: *
Shahbaz Sharif!
n btw....if Musharraf can plan a coup without the PM knowin until all the plannin in complete....why cant he engineer the Kargil thing?!
[/QUOTE]
What kinda loyal Ruler was he ?? His brother was creating mess out of Pakistan and he stood quite ? Was he a infant k Nawaz nay pecifier laga dee tu Shehbaz Sharif chup ho gaya ? He should have raised the voice against the corruption by PML(N) but he didnt.
Well said NW :k:
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nakhrey Wali: *
What kinda loyal Ruler was he ?? His brother was creating mess out of Pakistan and he stood quite ? Was he a infant k Nawaz nay pecifier laga dee tu Shehbaz Sharif chup ho gaya ? He should have raised the voice against the corruption by PML(N) but he didnt.
[/QUOTE]
He was the Punjab CM n he did his job very well!!
raising his voice? wht difference wud tht make anyway?!
n PT....theyre jus shakin hands!!....that doesnt mean anything!
n we were talkin bout the head of state being informed!
Hes done more for Punjab in 3 yrs than Mushys chamcha Parvez Elahi will in his entire life!