No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

The age-old practice of turning the soil before planting a new crop is a leading cause of farmland degradation. Many farmers are thus looking to make plowing a thing of the past

John Aeschliman turns over a shovelful of topsoil on his 4,000-acre farm in the Palouse region of eastern Washington State. The black earth crumbles easily, revealing a porous structure and an abundance of organic matter that facilitate root growth. Loads of earthworms are visible, too—another healthy sign.

Thirty-four years ago only a few earthworms, if any, could be found in a spadeful of his soil. Back then, Aeschliman would plow the fields before each planting, burying the residues from the previous crop and readying the ground for the next one. The hilly Palouse region had been farmed that way for decades. But the tillage was taking a toll on the Palouse, and its famously fertile soil was eroding at an alarming rate. Convinced that there had to be a better way to work the land, Aeschliman decided to experiment in 1974 with an emerging method known as no-till farming.

re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

This story is a supplement to the feature “No-Till: How Farmers Are Saving the Soil by Parking Their Plows” which was printed in the July 2008 issue of Scientific American.

A fundamental drawback of conventional farming is that it fosters topsoil erosion, especially on sloping land. Tillage leaves the ground surface bare and vulnerable to runoff, and each pass of the plow pushes soil downhill. As a result, the soil thins over time. How long this process takes depends not only on how fast plowing pushes soil downhill—and wind or runoff carries it away—but also on how fast the underlying rocks break down to form new soil.

In the 1950s, when the Soil Conservation Service (now known as the Natural Resources Conservation Service) began defining tolerable rates of soil erosion from agricultural land, hardly any data on rates of soil production were available. The agency thus determined the so-called soil loss tolerance values, or T values, on the basis of what farmers could do to reduce erosion without “undue economic impact” using conventional farming equipment. These T values correspond to as much as an inch of erosion in 25 years. But recent research has shown that erosion rate to be far faster than the rate at which soil rebuilds.

Over the past several decades, scientists have determined that measuring the soil concentrations of certain isotopes that form at a known rate permits direct quantification of soil production rates. Applying this technique to soils in temperate regions in coastal California and southeastern Australia, geologist Arjun Heimsath of Arizona State University and his colleagues found soil production rates ranging from 0.00118 to 0.00315 inch a year. As such, it takes 300 to 850 years to form an inch of soil in these places. My own recent global compilation of data from soil production studies, published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, revealed an average rate of 0.00067 to 0.00142 inch a year—equivalent to 700 to 1,500 years to form an inch of soil.

The soil on undisturbed hillsides in temperate and tropical latitudes is generally one to three feet thick. With natural soil production rates of centuries to millennia per inch and soil erosion rates of inches per century under plow-based agriculture, it would take just several hundred to a couple of thousand years to plow through the soil in these regions. This simple estimate predicts remarkably well the life span of major agricultural civilizations around the world. With the exception of the fertile river valleys along which agriculture began, civilizations generally lasted 800 to 2,000 years, and geoarchaeological studies have now shown a connection between soil erosion and the decline of many ancient cultures.

Clearly, then, if we are to conserve resources for future generations, we need alternatives to conventional farming practices. No-till systems simultaneously reduce the erosive force of runoff and increase the ability of the ground to hold onto soil, making these methods remarkably effective at curbing erosion. In a study published in 1993, researchers at the University of Kentucky found that no-till methods decreased soil erosion by a whopping 98 percent. More recently, investigators at the University of Tennessee reported that no-till tobacco farming reduced soil erosion by more than 90 percent over conventional tobacco cultivation. Although the effect of no-till on erosion rates depends on a number of local factors, such as the type of soil and the crop, it can bring soil erosion rates down close to soil production rates.

In the mid-1990s Cornell University researchers estimated that undoing damage caused by soil erosion would cost the U.S. $44 billion a year, and that it would take an annual investment of about $6 billion to bring erosion rates on U.S. cropland in line with soil production. They also estimated that each dollar invested in soil conservation would save society more than $5. Because it is prohibitively expensive to put soil back on the fields once it leaves, the best, most cost-effective strategy for society at large is to keep it on the fields in the first place.

re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

From post 1 it was not clear cons farming uses chemicals. Where did you get that Mr. P. ( did not read link)

re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

Guess this is confusing. I should probably organize it better.

Re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

Those are some staggeringly high numbers! :eek:

Re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

Indeed they are. And that's just for the US. Pakistan me to Allah jane kia hota hoga.

Re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

Actually an excellent pair of articles Mr. P. Our yard has lots of earthworms. The wife has a nice Veg garden going. We keep last years soil and tomatoes etc that fall off in place. So without realizing it we are doing no till farming at micro level.

The stats on erosion rates vs replenishment rates backed by 800-1000 yrs of civilzn in each region is revealing. Great find.

Re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

Turning the soil also reduces the moisture holding capacity of the soil, necessitating huge water input. So no-till reduces the water requirement of farming too. I guess this article missed that.

So you're saving on fertilizers and water, all while preventing erosion. Bravo Southie.

Re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

^ this is just coincidence. We did not know any of this.

Re: No Till: How Farmers are saving the soil by parking their ploughs

Very interesting article...and it makes sense too!