No new university in Hyderabad

[Sa1eem]

Re: No new university in Hyderabad

@kakaballi

^ No point arguing with someone who doesn’t understand the basic principles like ‘ratio’, ‘proportion’ and ‘relatively’. I am not suggesting that smaller cities should have SAME facilities as larger cities. Simply saying that RELATIVELY more should be spent on smaller cities compared to larger cities (per capita or per sq. mile or on whatever basis).

Saying that London has more facilities because it pays taxes is absolutely ABSURD. London houses more than 12% of UK’s population and is perhaps the largest city in Europe. It has ‘more’ facilities because it is BIG and those facilities are required to cater for such large population and businesses.

I can refer you to tons and tons and tons of literature in economics which would tell you that taxation is used a tool for REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH (a simple search on Google scholar should reveal that to you anyways and you yourself have given example of how ALL people in UK receive similar health and education facilities regardless of what area they live in and how much tax is generated in that area). Kindly find me any literature suggesting that government should spend more in an areas where it receives more taxation.

Thank you for letting me know that I do not understand basic principles like ‘ratio’, ‘proportion’ and ‘relatively’, something obviously you understand very well. According to you, population of London is ~12 percent of UK population (what is correct figure too). That means ratio of 1:7 or 1 out of every 8 person who lives in UK lives in London.

So, can you tell me that how come it is only London (1 out of 8 people) that has underground facilities (that extensively covers London), almost all Known Museums, almost all specialised hospitals, and most clubs and creational facilities are in London? Why most international airports and railway stations are located in and around London? Why London is severed in every way better than any part of UK?

Is it because London is capital of UK? … But then, New York is not capital of USA, still, New York is best served city of USA, why?

Is it all miracles of ‘ratio’, ‘proportion’ and ‘relatively’ … or is something missing somewhere?

Anyhow, reading your mentality and looking at some posts here, now I can understand why Bangla-Dash got separated, why Baluchistan wants Independence from Pakistan and exploitation by Pakistan, why PPP can play Sindh card where we have many who wants to get out of Pakistani federation, South Punjab wants to get away from exploitation of North Punjab, and so on … just because people do not understand basics of KakaBalli’s terms ‘Ratio’, ‘Proportion’ and ‘Relatively’ and thus these phrases are not working.

I would not be surprised that if such mentality would stay, days are not far when Karachi and Hyderabad would also ask for own province to come out of exploitation (however relative that exploitation maybe). If that would happen, do not say that people of Karachi do not understand ‘ratio’, ‘proportion’ and ‘relatively’.

Note: No one disagrees with the principle that part of revenue generated in financially affluent areas or (areas that is generating revenue due to natural resources) should be diverted to uplift under-developed and deprived areas, but that should be part of revenue and not major part of revenue. Government should spend major part of revenue in areas those revenues got generated.

If government would do that (rob one area to feed other), then people who pay taxes without getting the benefit of those taxes, or people who believe revenues collected from natural resources of their area are not spent on them, then these people would fight for separation, independence or whatever, and that would not only harm people of underdeveloped and deprived areas (who will even stop benefiting from any revenue contribution from affluent area), but would harm Pakistan too.