All's well, that end's well. Now time for post-mortem:
There were many things reeking in this case. The absence of a guy accomplice for the most part. Unless it was another immaculate conception, how can a woman be the sole person charged for adultary? Even if its her ex-husband, once he is ex- and he performed sex, by the law of the land, he has committed zinaa. Why was he not charged? Then the haste in which the case was decided the first time around, when the baby was barely born. Seemed like the prosecutors just wanted to make a point, and not necessarily had a good case.