Re: New Video Appears To Show Bhutto Being Shot
No one of the govt. parrots here on the forum mentioned that it was or could be digitally manipulated.
Well, video by ch 4 was not digitally manipulated but what I can say is that, video was digitally worked at. It was worked to get all video noise out of the video and make the frame cleaner.
[quote]
The question is not about who refused the autopsy and why it wasnt done. The video serves as an evidence against govt's last official statement about her cause of death where they said there were no bullet wounds although they said earlier that cause of death was bullet wounds. The official govt. statements have flip-flopped.
[/quote]
I checked the video frame by frame and still I could not say that video conclusively proves that bullet did hit BB. So, at best one can say that video was inconclusive. Scarf and hair of BB did flew, but cause of that could not be conclusively that bullet hit her. Rather to me, video proves that she was not hit by bullet (I am not trying to be funny here but that is true).
If bullet had hit her than we would have seen the impact (as video is quite in detail) and in that frame we would have seen some blood splattering out from the place bullet hit.
As for scarf and hair flying, than that could have happened because she went in the car swiftly after first bullet was fired (check the video carefully) as second shot came while she was moving down and the time third shot came she was almost in the car. In later slow motion frames of Ch 4 (there was no sound), still one can see that she moved in quite swiftly and there was no splatter of blood in any frame even though we know that the injury she received was such that lot of blood came out (it seems that purpose of video was to create controversy).
Scarf and hair flew because of either her swift movement downwards, or maybe first bullet did passed her head closely causing her scarf and hair to fly. But then, it is possible that bullet did hit ... that is only speculative. [Normally (and what I believe), if bullet had hit her neck (as that is probably most likely cause of huge blood loss), we should have seen blood splattering at time of contact, but from video that is not evident]
[quote]
yes she may have hit the sunroof/lever blah blah after she was hit on the skull/neck from the left side of the vehicle as seen clearly in the video. Whether a combination of these wounds killed her, im not sure.
[/quote]
You could be right, but that is only speculative. Question is that government did not needed to come up with story of bullet not hitting her if bullet did hit her, as government first statement was that she died of bullet wounds. To me, they changed the story only because some evidence from hospital came (as government claims) that says she died not because of bullet wound because bullet did not hit her.
My understanding from what government claims (as hospital report) is that BB hearing bullet sound (or maybe bullet passing very near her and she realizing that), she swiftly went inside the car and while she was going in (reached below sunroof and thus inside the car), bomb blew and that cause huge shock wave that along with her swift movement downward made her head hit the latch with huge force, that caused damage to her head, and caused her death.
Nevertheless, to me it is very ironic that she got killed and instead of real reason of her death ... and about her killer (two blokes, one done the shooting and other suicide bomb, both knowing that they would die but were still calm) ... we are bickering on non-issue that she died of bullet wound or whatever.
Most surprising thing is that western media is also doing the same and if you will see the video, last part of it, you will notice that Ch 4 spokesman in Islamabad was asked by studio man that, what government gained out of it, and the bloke in Islamabad started talking shiit, something that was ridiculously off tangent.
[No one is talking that ... the person who killed BB knew that he would die too, as he was not even bothered to take the gun out openly in crowd plus he knew bomb blast was to follow, still he was not fearful of his life, shows that he was committed and was expecting no worldly rewards, but rewards to himself after death ... that is sure sign of their association ... that anyone can guess]