Spock and Daleel 
**Brother, forget Reuters or any media anywhere in world, or any eminent journalists working for any media, because these days it seems that media no where in the world are reporting 100 percent truth (many may not lie, but certainly twist things). Thus, one cannot trust any media unquestioned, and certainly no journalists are trustworthy, as most have started using their profession to spread propaganda for payment, and Pakistani corrupts have made lot of money from corruption and they are spending lot of money to buy Journalists and media space. **
Hence, can’t you both show some logical assumptions? Well, both of you have taken up a name that shows that you should conclude things logically (Spock of star-trek is logical being, and as for daleel, that means reasoning’ and still it seems that assumptions you both advocate, if logic and Reason was personalities, they would have been crying.
Brothers, please think. If America has given Aid or grant to Pakistan than Pakistan could not have denied the existence of such Aid or Grant, could it? Pakistan would only deny such Aid or Grant if such Aid or Grants does not exist. This is the logical reasoning.
Example: Let say USA claims that USA gave 5 billion dollars to Pakistan as Grant in last 5 years and gives 1 billion dollars grant every year. If there is truth in it, Pakistan cannot deny that, as denying means calling officials in USA liars. Why?
**Because, who take Aid or grants are under obligations and they also know that if giver (USA) is claiming what Aid or Grant they gave, they have to claim because they are answerable to their treasury, plus denying that means bad relation as well as stoppage of such grants. **
Bad relations because if American government got Aid and Grants sanctioned for Pakistan from their treasury, and has not given that to Pakistan (as Pakistan is denying that they have not received that) than it means people in government has stolen that money. So, when they give grant they have proof too, and thus if Pakistan would deny they would bring the proof out and apart of that, relation would go bad as well as in future there would be no aid or grants.
Hence, it is almost impossible that American would claim that they gave Aid or grant and Pakistan would deny that. Where discrepancy starts? It starts when USA media (or sometime some USA politicians) may claim other reimbursements as Aid or grant what is not really Aid or grants. Sometime they might exaggerate the amount of Aid or Grant too for political reasons, but would not comment if Pakistan would deny that (knowing that what Pakistan is denying is true).
We have to remember that those that give Aid or Grant can exaggerate and recipient country could not do anything other than deny that, because in such situation they can deny without protest from giving country. Hence if USA exaggerates than Pakistan would deny and one has to accept that denial as truth if USA did not protest on that denial.
Now, if you have intelligent and logical mind, I am sure that you will accept the above argument, but if you do not, then please let me know. Meanwhile, I am looking for article that I have read sometime back, written by top Pakistani official, who under the limelight of all propaganda by American media and Pakistan corrupt politicians, gave the breakout of all American financial assistance Pakistan received during Musharraf rule and discussed its impact if they are stopped. Once I find the article, I will post it.
