Nawaz's slow surrender

Before the elections positive vibes were coming from Nawaz Sharif. It was important for the civilian leadership to have wrested the powers related to Internal security and foreign affairs from the military but it seems as if he has succumbed. Kill and dump policy is continuing in Balochistan. What is the governments policy for dealing terrorism in KPK/FATA? As far as load-shedding the government should have diverted gas being used up by the powerful CNG/Fertilizer mafia for electricity generation (they were signalling this before the elections). Instead they have adopted a temporary way out by increasing the tariffs. No bold decision has been taken by the government, it seems to be the continuation of PPP’s government (minus the corruption scandals - so far).

A slow surrender? - DAWN.COM

IT’S an old trick of Nawaz’s: the more you see, the less you know. And he’s at it again.

DCC, NSC, CDNS, none of it matters really until you get the A, B, C right. I.E. It’s not the name that matters, it’s the configuration and the quality of the decisions that do.

**Before the election, Nawaz seemed to be on the right track.
**
**The NSC was anathema because it represented all that the politicians had come to loathe: institutionalising what was the de facto arrangement of power — military on top, the civilians thrashing around below.
**
Before the election, Nawaz seemed to get that the DCC is more miss than hit not because of its existing configuration, but because it didn’t have the right ammunition.

Give the DCC a proper secretariat, a dedicated staff that can help the principals make sense of things, and much of the fog would automatically lift — at least on the civilian side, because the military already has all the paper-churning backup it needs in GHQ and Aabpara.

That was before the election.

**After the election, are we witnessing a slow surrender?
**
Nawaz being Nawaz, it’s never easy to say. Inscrutable and insular at the best of times, he’s taken it to a new level this time — just ask any of the desperate PML-N leaders always asking around about what their boss is thinking, or even up to.

But there are some clues to what Nawaz is thinking, if not planning and doing.

First, you have to go back to the basic Nawaz mould. He did and seems still to consider himself heir to the Mughal throne.

Ardeshir Cowasjee used to tell a brilliant, possibly embellished, tale about this particular tendency of Nawaz.

The prime minister’s office once rang up Ardeshir to inform him that Nawaz wanted to pay a visit to the splendid Cowasjee home in Karachi. He wasn’t told why, but since no one says no to a visit by the prime minister, Ardeshir agreed.

When an advance team arrived at his home to secure it and map out the visit, an objection was raised.

**The little wooden door through which all visitors entered the Cowasjee home required everyone to stoop a bit, to avoid banging their head against the beam above the door.

**The prime minister doesn’t bow his head before anyone, Ardeshir was told by the prime ministerial advance team, you’ll have to use a different entrance to receive him.

**Heir to the Mughal throne means Nawaz will only do things when Nawaz is ready to do them.

**The election, Nawaz decided, was a referendum on electricity, so that was his first priority. When terrorism quickly forced itself to the front of the queue, Nawaz’s default response kicked in: I’m not ready yet, I’ve got five years, I’ll deal with this in my way, on my own clock.

**Terrorism, India, Afghanistan, Punjab, intelligence, police, CDNS — they’re all inter-linked and nowhere has the Nawaz imprint been made yet.
**
If it rested at that, perhaps it would not matter that much. But there is one significant difference between Nawaz 3.0 and the earlier versions: while he’s not ready to decide, he’s letting others decide.

It matters less that the leaner, supposedly more focused CDNS will have one more civilian member than uniformed; what matters is that the uniformed members can be expected to speak as one and they alone have a semi-institutionalised form of decision-making and input-taking.

**How that squares with Nawaz’s pre-election promise of the civilians leading and the military following isn’t hard to figure out: it doesn’t.
**
The second clue to what Nawaz is thinking was doing the rounds for weeks and confirmed in his speech this week: he and his team had no real idea how bad things were.

**That things were bad was obvious enough; just how bad they are has only dawned on the N-League leadership after coming to power. Reality has caused Nawaz to pause, to take stock first before figuring out what has to be done.
**
Politics is of course, and unhappily, supreme here. The right thing to do is secondary to the politically advantageous, or least disadvantageous, thing to do.

The go-slow approach — for now — is less about figuring out what to do, but about figuring out how to fit the new, post-election, since-coming-to-power information into the political matrix of decision-making.

Yeah, for example, dialogue isn’t going to go anywhere, but take it off the table quickly and what could that mean for peace in the realm — Fortress Sharif, Punjab?

The third clue comes courtesy the very small circle that speaks to Nawaz on such matters. Call it the ‘C’ choice: confrontation or co-option.

**Confrontation is off the table, Nawaz’s aides claim. Don’t think about it as wresting power back from the army, they explain, think of it as finding ways to take everyone along.
**
Even talk of co-option makes Nawaz’s aides squeamish; they’d rather not frame civ-mil relations in a way that suggests one side emerging ahead of the other. Seen from that perspective, the CDNS makes sense.

**An institutionalised role for the army; a decision in which there was some give-and-take (no NSC, but significant say); a group that presents a joint front; a body that allows one side, the military, to press its case, while the other side, Nawaz, makes up his mind — it gives the veneer of forward movement, while allowing the state of suspended animation to continue.
**
Essentially, the heir to the Mughal throne keeps his robes, while the original power centre doesn’t have to get its guard up. A neat, temporary arrangement, if ever there was one.

Except, passivity on the civilian side can lead to that most familiar of denouements: where everyone begins to see the heir to the Mughal throne is dressed in the emperor’s clothes.

The writer is a member of staff.
[email protected]
Twitter: @cyalm

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

people in opposition see things that are there but people in power do NOT see what's there...sab apnaa apnaa ulloo seedhaa karte haiN iqtidaar Haasil karne ke liye yaa phir apne iqtidaar ko barqaraar rakhne ke liye ... they have this vintage point and as a result they are ALL the same once they are in government.

Re: Nawaz’s slow surrender

Upto some extent you are right especially they are failed to stop Killing of people! IMHO, NS with other party leader especially with IK must take some steps to stop this killing. But I am afraid that IK is not ready to talk/support in these matters. He should stop crying and see the overall benefits of Pakistan. We should get united as its a very hard time for Pakistan but afsoos hamain aapus main larnay marnay say moqa nahin mil raha hay tou Paksitan kay baray main kia sochain giay :hinna:

PS : hamain main “main” khdu bhi shamil hoon :cobra:

first comment on my post :@:
daikho daikho koun naseehatain kar raha hay :cb:

Re: Nawaz’s slow surrender

Imran Khan can help in KPK (FATA is exclusively federal government’s domain) but the government’s ‘anti terror policy’ is not ready yet. Otherwise in Balochistan he has got nothing to do. The kill and dump policy of Baloch activists (which began during PPP’s tenure) is continuing unabated. Nothing dramatic has happened in energy generation, foreign policy and other matters.

Re: Nawaz’s slow surrender

A Dream Gone Sour - By Arif Rafiq | Foreign Policy

In a little more than 70 days since Nawaz Sharif assumed the premiership for the third time, Pakistan has seen around 70 terrorist attacks claiming more than 350 lives. Over the past two months, moreover, there has been a major jihadist prison break; an attack on a regional office of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan’s top intelligence agency; numerous attacks on mosques, Shiite congregations, and funerals; and various political assassinations.

Yet in the midst of this chaos, Sharif has largely been missing from the scene. Earlier this month, as the dead bodies piled up, the prime minister spent a week in Mecca on a non-obligatory religious pilgrimage he makes every year. Sharif delayed his trip in order to accommodate U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s visit to Islamabad, but chose not to return home early as the terrorist attacks mounted and tensions with India grew more inflamed over a series of border-firings by both militaries. Having just convened the Defense Committee of the Cabinet (DCC) – Pakistan’s equivalent of the U.S. National Security Council – for the first time in his 11 weeks in office on Aug. 22, he is far away from announcing a national security strategy.

Sharif’s laissez-faire approach to national security has not gone unnoticed. There has been significant public outcry – most notably on the country’s two dozen cable news channels – against his weak counterterrorism stance. In response, Sharif’s interior minister, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, held a press conference on Aug. 13 calling the anti-terror fight a “battle for Pakistan’s survival”](http://dawn.com/news/1035305/anti-terror-war-now-a-battle-for-survival-nisar) – a transformation worthy of Jekyll and Hyde for a party that, as head of the federal opposition for the past five years, largely stood against major counterterrorism initiatives. In 2010, for example, Shahbaz Sharif, the prime minister’s brother and a member of his Pakistani Muslim League (PML-N) party, sought détente with the TTP, asking the militants to spare the Punjab province, where he serves as chief minister, rather than standing with the federal government against terrorism.

For its part, Sharif’s government has tried to spin its inaction as the result of a deliberate and studied approach. Earlier this month, Khan, the interior minister, asked the public to remain patient, explaining that the government had not yet produced a final counterterrorism strategy because ithas beendoing its"](Nisar calls for patience on upcoming national security policy)homework." But few Pakistanis buy this explanation. The PML-N ruled Pakistan’s largest province, Punjab, and led the opposition for the past five years as the terrorist threat metastasized. Favored to win in this year’s polls, it was seen for the previous several years as the government-in-waiting. In other words, the PML-N had plenty of time – including a one-month post-election transition period – to get much of its homework done. Instead, it has allowed the terrorists to seize the initiative.

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

I am looking for my loan please, can you guys help. Nawaz Sharif was promising loans at the doorsteps before elections.

Re: Nawaz’s slow surrender

long list of surrenders:

Surrender to the army - DCC

Surrender to the IMF

Surrender to powerful Mafia’s

Surrender to the taleban

:sleep:

This was Ch Nisar’s stance two weeks back, http://www.thefrontierpost.com/article/33187/.

And now he says:

He said that he does not want to talk of any other option in case the dialogue option does not work. “Our priority is dialogue, and we don’t want to talk of anything else right now,” he said.

Nisar said that the PML-N has been opposed to the post-9/11 policies of the Musharraf regime. “You just go through my speeches in parliament as Leader of the Opposition; I have always been in favour of dialogue instead of the use of force,” he said.

Completely endorsing the prime minister’s dialogue offer, the interior minister lamented that the media recently misreported that the Defence Committee of the Cabinet (DCC) had set the condition that the government would talk to only those extremist groups that would lay down their arms. “It was totally baseless,” he said, adding that the DCC meeting never discussed this.

Re: Nawaz’s slow surrender

promises of elections = josh-e-khitabat :chai:

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

Noon league has been challenged in these last months and it seems that they are not capable of facing them. I am still waiting for the counter terror policy to be a reality, seems like they are not interested to stop the increasing terror acts. Sad!

Re: Nawaz’s slow surrender

^ they are more interested in saving business wth india,cheeni ak karubar chalta rahay ab :yawn:

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

surrender ??

NS is what he always was. No backbone. Lying deceiving. Talking people into sabaz bagh..
He never changed.

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

Devilish_angel: True. And ppl were claiming that noon league is more matured party than others. What have they done to differ from others? Seems their only focus is punjab.

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

cyril is a brilliant writer. Was a pleasure talking to him during lums days. He never sounded this coherent when he talked though. This article is expertly penned.

the article, well NS ka tajurba hi kaafi hai.

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender


it may largely be true but he did go against the world when he carried out nuclear explosions...it proves that he is capable of taking tough decisions.

he just has to show some resolve and then forge ahead.

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

Ganjas slow surrender

Re: Nawaz's slow surrender

Nawaz Sharif ka naaRa bandhna to sab ko yaad ho ga, woh naaRa kabhi tight ho hee nahi saka thaa.... dheeray dheeray shalwar hi slip ho gayee :D