Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

From my blog:

Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Imran Khan has been so quixotically persistent about peace talks with the militants that it seems as if he wanted to engage the TTP even before it was actually formed. The bestial body of barbarians did not take away from us a hope we all knew as Naya Pakistan, but they seem to have pulped it fatally. TTP is subjected to regular bashing for anti-state activities and Imran’s unstoppable mantra of talking to them is equal to having a joint account with them to receive a fair share of this criticism.

From a strong beam of hope to a crumbling flash of light and a political paladin to devil’s advocate, the followers of a fantasy might have already started to feel misled. The way forward Imran Khan charted before elections now seems to be swirling around FATA ad infinitum.

Imran’s parley paradox is dubbed as an oversimplified panacea for the entire gambit of terrorism in the country. And while he argues in favour of his position, he puts his party and his adherents in an awkward situation.

Taliban have created a smokescreen of religion that has an emotional value for Muslims, but it is incompatible both with the spirit of the religion and the coherence of the nation. The state cannot amend itself according to Shariah exegesis of a group which considers itself the final authority on the affairs of religion, morality, politics, science, medicine, society, sports and international relations. It should not be a difficult decision to make whether the state and its citizens would be governed by the Constitution of the country or by the whims of a group powered by suicide bombers.

What Imran generally appears to be overlooking is the fact that he has made himself a hostage to a single issue — however vital it maybe — and has confined himself to just one problem. While Sindh appears to be a distant relative to him, Balochistan simply does not register on his radar. The fact of Punjab still being in the pocket of the ruling party does not seem to be giving Imran sleepless nights. The issues of rigging, inflation, re-accumulated circular debt, privatization, Karachi operation and sectarianism are some problems that have been grossly neglected by the PTI chairman.

Imran mostly appears immersed in his over-obsession with drones and TTP talks and tends to overlook the fact that he is being cornered systematically. The reaction of the media and his opponents on his refusal to be a part of TTP’s negotiation panel should serve as an eye-opener to him that he is being pushed from the mainstream bloc to the religiopolitical camp.

Positions taken by the media, intelligentsia and other political parties make an interesting reading. Not a single leader or intellectual demand to bulldoze the terror camp without first going for a peaceful solution. It is almost the same stance boosted by Imran. But the portrayals of both positions are strikingly different. While the civil society and political fraternity are shown in favour of talks with strings attached, Imran’s position is widely interpreted as unconditional support to the TTP. Imran must understand how detrimental it could be to take a resolute position on an initiative that is doomed to fail. While the rest of the country seems to be fence sitting comfortably, Imran’s unwavering stance in favour of unconditional talks may set him back to an irretrievable position of isolation.

Imran needs to repackage its narrative on the issue of dialogue with the TTP. Given the fact that the media has created a hostile atmosphere, Imran needs to understand that it runs the risk of being ghettoized by its dialogue demarche. He must put in place a solid firewall to protect himself and his party from the debris of a collapsed peace initiative. The epithet of ‘Taliban Khan’ will not be easy to remove and Imran must refrain from strengthening this tag. PTI must not let the bigger picture of a prosperous Pakistan through a clean government recede into oblivion by getting hijacked to a single issue.

Imran had taken a position in favour of Musharraf which had to be revisited and is still used against him. Imran had to apologize for his stance on welcoming Musharraf. He needs to see carefully if his stand on the TTP and dialogue process does not turn out to be a repeat of Musharraf gaffe.

The PTI chairman has already become a media bête noire while his media team appears to be astonishingly incapable of coming up with a proper plan to repulse the media blitz. From Haroon-ur-Rashid to Hasan Nisar, the party has lost almost all of its sympathizers in the media.

The omniscient media personnel — capable of giving expert opinion on solar system to actually running PCB — have deep-sixed PTI’s position on the insurgency issue. Imran should be able to navigate out of this mess and salvage his image to nullify the impact which is harming him like never before.

The religious cluster of the country has been sustaining on the sole agenda of anti-Americanism for eons. It is a fact that anti-Americanism runs fast and deep in the society. So is the fact that electoral verdicts delivered even till last elections have been mind-bogglingly against the anti-US elements. While the anti-US stratagem attracts a lot of attention, it simply does not result in votes. PTI does not need to walk the beaten-to-death track of anti-Americanism for vote appeal as it already has a solid vote bank based on liberal ethos. In other words, PTI does not need to become another Jamaat-e-Islami.

Imran should know that he cannot change the psyche of his nation that yawns on Iqbal’s verses and give standing ovation to Sultan Rahi’s dialogues.

Pakistanis have worldwide rights of protection of the Muslim cause. If they come to know that the Muslim community on planet Mars is suffering atrocities at the hand of a non-Muslim government, Pakistanis will observe a protest across the country the very next day. Some American flags along with some hoardings, public vehicles and petrol stations would be religiously set on fire in solidary with their Muslim brethren living on Mars. Such is our sense of responsibility and commitment towards the cause of the ummah.

And last but not least, even Pakistani talk shows would be discussing the latest development on Mars and the most pertinent question would be why Imran Khan does not openly condemn government on Mars?

At the height of a funding misappropriation scam, allegedly involving the PTI chairman as well, an intellectual remarked that: “Only Imran can destroy Imran.” The moment of truth has perhaps arrived for him.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Actally this man was never having any capability of becoming a political leader . His mother's family background helped him and he reached to a slot of captain of cricket team with traditional conspiracies of Takt e Lahore . Than the toy became a play boy and got married with christian converted Jew family . That all helped him to raise Shaukat Khanum , People of Pakistan supported him than like every other popular Pakistani he went into hands of establishment and became a politician but remained failed till the Gen Pasha came out to support him all out . My Pakistan loving and cricket fan overseas Pakistanis supported him in a big way but due to lack of capability he could not catch the position and after Pasha establishment was not supporting him as before so he became annoyed and tried to conflict them . He could not sense the public feelings against Taliban , Now it is was the point where he had to decide to remain on his policy about Taliban . He became afraid to see the PTI's Nirralas attitude about Taliban and also an open chance of losing KPK government in case of operation . So he took another U-Turn .
There is another issue of policies of JI attached with him . He should must ask them to stop to support Taliban or part his ways from JI without any further waist of time .

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

One should not be written off for making mistakes, we all do. Imran's mistakes do not strip him of the credentials he hold to lead his nation. And you will have to acknowledge these credentials were neither granted to him for being a military flunky nor was he willed them. I do not want to resurrect the issue of 1971 tragedy, but Bhutto's political misadventures are well-documented.

To save you more time, yes I acknowledge that Bhuttos and Zardaris do not make mistakes :)

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Every one make mistakes but the question is of capability , Zardari was not capable so cause damage to party
I AM NOT WORRIED ABOUT PTI
I am worried about the nation .

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

As I have said before, Imran needs a miandad in his PTI team. Perhaps there are miandads, but it remains to be seen if they would be the co-Kaptaan in ths PTI one-dayers.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

I am not wholly convinced of Imran's view on being unwavering once you have made a decision. Being a captain, he should know that you withdraw your best bowler from attack if he is being hit vigorously. Sometimes you become offensive and sometimes you become slow to see off difficult bowlers. It's all part of the game and one plays according to ground realities. Even armed forces sometimes retreat in wars as a ploy.

So Imran should understand that his decision for talks should have been changed according to the ground realities. But he chose to stick to his stance which harmed his position.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

So how come miandad was a co-captain in the run up to the 1992 world cup? Was there danda by the PCB? If there was then PTI is doomed...

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Do you want to discuss cricket here?

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

The analogy is the same especially since PTI and fans like to promote imran's kaptaan status. The only other worthwhile thing that he has done is shaukat khanum, but then should edhi, ansar burni and tons of other singers / actors like shehzad roy be in politics as well?

Imran can have good ideas (many people do..) but he doesn't have that quick thinking wit that is needed in a pakistani leader. He comes off as a pahari aadmi which is exactly what is not needed in the complex situation Pakistan is facing right now. Musharraf has had his flaws but he had the foresight (gave media freedom in Pakistan and LG was a good step). Pakistan needs someone like Deng in China not Mao who was high on emotional rhetoric which killed millions on the Great Leap Forward.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Imran's views are over exposed, over analysed, over debated and overly opposed and that’s the problem. People want to see him on the Cross for not the things he says but the things he doesn’t say. The irony here is too apparent to ignore.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

There is no bar on Edhi, Ansar Burni and Shehzad Roy to be in politics. So if they are not in politics, it doesn't mean others like them should also not venture into politics.

We have seen politics mainly as a family-limited business in our country. Parties' mantles are passed on to the next generations through a will scribbled on a notebook page. Hardcore businessmen are nurtured to run Islamabad Inc. Pakistan unfortunately does not have a remarkable lineup of statesmen. Competition breeds quality. In our country, politicians compete in corruption — the bigger corrupt, the better. If you explore the available lot of politicians, there is a possibility that you will end up highly disappointed. Pakistan does not have any Deng Xiaoping for replacement or comparison. And leaders are not like locomotives that you can buy from China. We will have to do with what we have.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Why not? His social activism and stance on education is particularly refereshing and quite needed, if he ever finds himself in a position where he feels the neeed to do something more or a lot more, he'd probably join politics. Shame for a man nearing fourty, he still has a baby face. Not sure if it's supposed to be a good thing in politics.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

So you basically want to make him be BBZified so that jiyalas do naach on whatever their "leader" says that even an urdu speaker like me had trouble understanding the meaning of his speaches. Must be the accent...

BBZ complex? :p

Btw, my quip was that there should be more rigorous process by which politicians come up the ladder which certainly hasn't happend for Imran. Perhaps, if he was seasoned then the verbal diarrhea that happens like we should negotiate with taliban while standing on the dead bodies of shiites in quetta would not happen. Call me an idealist but Pakistan has come to a point that andhon may kaana raja won't even be able to drag this country along. Taliban to education to strategic alignment to water issues you name it require very firm and bold rethink.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Political Parties in Pakistan are basically either family businesses or local mafia groups. Imran could've been a PM of Pakistan ten years ago or at least a most senior minister or even PCB a Chief if he was political savvy. He's been one man army for so long that it's os easy to make him fall for baits. Rigorous process would make sense if in Pakistan, political parties were National Institutions. Sadly Imran had no already set up platform, he'd not come through established parties like Labour or Conservatives where he could expect a large network of people to take care of him and guide him (look how Conservatives came to Obama's rescue when he went quite overboard with his naive hunky dory Foreign Policies). As far as his welfare policies and humanitarian work is concerned, he's stop on, but it would've helped if he had senior and experienced bench of ex Foreign Office personnel advising him.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

[QUOTE]
So you basically want to make him be BBZified so that jiyalas do naach on whatever their "leader" says that even an urdu speaker like me had trouble understanding the meaning of his speaches. Must be the accent...

BBZ complex? :p

[/QUOTE]

Forget Imran, can you imagine this leader winning a live debate against most junior MQM Student Union member? LOL

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Is there anything else with Imran Khan ?

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

[quote="Doppleganger, post:11, topic:307862"]

S
Btw, my quip was that there should be more rigorous process by which politicians come up the ladder which certainly hasn't happend for Imran./QUOTE]

Would you please name a few who came up through rigorous process?

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

Nothing, if you are an Anwar Pasha. A lot, otherwise.

Re: Nation’s spokesman or devil’s advocate?

yaar itni mushkil angrezi, i have to open a dictionary tab to understand it all :/