Re: Name them & shame them Series
How did I miss this thread — I’ll be back with my entries.hareem01
We are going to a state hopefully where defending them and apologizing for them (and providing justifications for slaughter) is so strong a taboo that people stop doing it. That will lead to an environment where there is no more confusion in the minds of our people that these acts are unacceptable. No ifs, ands or buts. The nuances people try to add create the air these animals need to brainwash more and more people.
We need to get to a point where deliberate targetting of innocents is an unqualified no-no. When Mullahs stop trying to explain it away, and so called Islam loving ordinary people stop manifesting their conflicting views as "justifications"on public forums like gupshup.
If one loves Islam, then it should give them moral clarity to know right from wrong and not find nuances. It’s not a conflict between two nation states where people are dying as collateral damage and explanations can be provided. We have sub-humans going around deliberating targetting the innocents and weak for the sole purpose of ‘terrorizing’ the populace with the intent to put them in submission.
I find it so ironic that Islam, which is actually pretty black and white religion (to an extreme I’d say), and its followers who in other matters are so ‘strict’ that they even argue about appropriate length of bears, all of a sudden drop their black and white moral compass when it comes to having unequivocal condemnation of these terrorists acts
Clear lines should be drawn as to what entails being a terrorist apologist. I see every Tom, Dick, and Harry accusing every other person as being an apologist…just like what we’ve done with the blasphemy law. Dangerous.