Muslims support UK's ban on Zakir Naik

[cricketplaya]

@Geist

if i go public with my cursing of any sahabi then that WOULD cause resentment would it not? if i keep it to myself and do not proclaim what i believe then would be another case. Zakir Naik went public with his demented views on Yazid. The same thing would happen with a shia speaker who gets rowdy with his cursing. Have seen it many times. **Sunnies have all the right to reject the majalis of the shias and the shias in turn have all the right to reject people like Zakir.

**

exactly. i don’t know why people start bringing their “other” issues. those two groups supporting the ban are just being emotional and nothing more.

Coming back to the original topic..what i dont understand is why the urgency to use words like “terrorism”? listening to his rebutall on Qta he said (paraphrase) : " if a thief sees a cop he gets terrorised, so a cop is a terrorist for the thief, so every muslim should be a terrorist". Now thats not a very nice analogy and i strongly believe that he could have made his point in other more appropriate words. That guy needs to revise his whole strategy

Why? if Bush can use the words, what should stop the Muslim? People need to get out of this mentality. Dare mention jihad in public and muslim apologetics would go crazy dissasociating with the speaker.

and please keep everything in context. listen again: