Muslims support UK's ban on Zakir Naik

[psyah]

@khoji

Psyah,

Why did you say that Muslims are opposing Naik due to “emotional reasons”?

you said earlier:

So there really need to be a grand “strategy” from Yahood o Nasara to stop the great Naik?! Who do you think he really is?

As far as rifts are concerned, they are present due to Muslims themselves. There is no need for anyone to create those rifts. And Naik himself is biggest controversial person who created another rift by declaring Yazid to be razi-allah.

“If he (Osama) is terrorizing America the terrorist, I am with him.” “Every Muslim is a terrorist”

@Geist

IConoclast:

zakir can believe whatever he wants to believe. he may even have Yazid the drunkard as his Caliph. but that fact wouldnt make him a really likeable character now would it?

and i still see no reason why he should be defended. " If Osama is terrorising America then everyone should be a terrorist"?? what is that supposed to mean? lame..

Peace no Muslim can honestly say that Dr Zakir Naik advocates terrorism, the reason for intentionally backing the media is because of your other problems with him. Look at the previous video to see his contrasted stance against terrorism and the real reason why UK want him out. It is because he openly declares the purpose of the media engine.

I don’t agree with his stance on Yazid, but at the same time I don’t agree with your stance on Sayyiduna Abu Bakr (RA), Umar (RA), or Uthman (RA), it doesn’t mean I should have you boycotted for a statement of yours that I take out of context.