Muslims should use oil as a weapon: Mahathir

http://www.jang-group.com/thenews/oct2002-daily/04-10-2002/world/w2.htm

MALACCA: Oil should be used as a weapon to protect the interests of Muslims, Malaysia’s Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad said Thursday.

“If we reduce oil output, prices will rise. It can be used as a weapon to protect the interest of Muslims,” Mahathir said. Malaysia is due to take over the chairmanship of the Organisation of the Islamic conference (OIC) next year.

“Oil is the only thing Muslim nations have which is needed by the rest of the world. If they can cut back on supply, people will not be oppressive on them,” Mahathir said.

"When we are weak, we will be exploited. We are now seeing worldwide Muslims are being exploited. "To avoid exploitation, we must be strong. We must reduce our dependence on others and acquire new knowledge.

"If we have oil, it can be used as a weapon. "OPEC (the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries) should control the price of oil but there is no unity in OPEC.

“When the oil price goes up, there are other nations that increase output. If we reduce oil output, prices will rise. It can be used as a weapon to protect the interest of Muslims.”

Mahathir criticised the US for what he called “anti-Muslim hysteria” after his country was placed on a list of 'terrorist-risk" countries.

Those comments came after it was also revealed that he and his deputy prime minister were subjected to tough security checks during separate visits to the US. Abdullah was required to remove his shoes and belt, while Mahathir said a security agent who boarded his jet in New York during his trip to see Bush had behaved in an uneccessarily “rough” manner.

The US embassy in Kuala Lumpur on Wednesday expressed regret for any “inappropriate treatment” of Malaysia’s leaders and pledged to try to ensure that it would not happen again. Mahathir said Thursday he accepted the US apology but added: “I was in my private plane. I am not going to carry a bomb in a government plane. Their approach towards me was rough but that is their country. If they want to be rude, we don’t go to their country.”

comment: it so simple and logical but unfortunatly the muslims have the misfortune of have having the most corrupt rulers and puppets of the west who only care for there bank balances and don’t give a damn for there people!

FULL MARKS TO mr mahathir
i pray there are more mahathirs than hosni mubaraks and faisals

Wake up please. Some facts you should consider :

  1. Muslim leaderships with the "OIL" advantage are already "sold-out"/puppets.

  2. Holding back OIL ? If those Arab countries had other sources or revenues like industries etc, then I would agree, but, no industries, no education hmmmmmmm...., its like imposing sanctions/trade embargos upon themselves.

regards

He is absolutely right. It is their oil, and they should use it in whatever fashion they choose. If they want to use it as a wepon, they should. I think the Kuwaitis establishment learnt very quickly what benefits they got in Saddams jails. I don't think that lesson has been forgotten by the guys who control the oil.

Well Saudi's can use oil as weapons, since they have a large amount of revenue which is generated during HAJJ time, to help them survive for at least 6 months.

They arent selling this oil for free, besides, Russia has now taken its old position as the largest oil producer replacing Saudi now...

It does not matter. Saudi may be a swing producer, but it is too entrenched with the US to change its ways. Democracy is the worst thing that can happen in the middle east. As it would force the rulers to follow the whims of the people. And if the people are in power, hell you would think Oil is as scarce as moon dust. It would dry up faster than clinton can get into an interns pants.

Oil is no longer a major problem. Saudi only exports around 7% to the US. The US has reserve stock piles to last it 2 years. a cut of oil for less than 6 months would not affect the US greatly and even then it would have severe reprecussions in the Islamic world.

Mahatir should control his tongue. These are not the sort of things you want to boast about or even suggest in international press. Best reserve such careless comments for the "discussion on bilateral issues of mutual importance" kinda meetings with the sheikhs of Middle East.

Ofcourse, if he is taking a pot shot on US for "rough treatment" by an idiot security guard, thats another matter. Even then, a more appropriate response would be to invite Bushy to Kuala Lampur and ask him to remove his cowboy boats in the Airforce One. Don't get mad, get even.

Of course he should keep quiet. He doesnt have his daddy's people helping him attack the rest of the world. Faisal it is freedom of speech. We need more leaders who speak their minds and do so honestly. The people want to use the oil weapon. The leaders do not as their patronage would then be dimished.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Spock: *
They arent selling this oil for free, besides, Russia has now taken its old position as the largest oil producer replacing Saudi now...
[/QUOTE]

This is interesting. Do you have a web-source to better explain this statement?

Thanks.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Faisal: *

This is interesting. Do you have a web-source to better explain this statement?

Thanks.
[/QUOTE]

Faisal, I saw it on the news about 4 months ago... I will try searching for a link.. Before disintegration, it was the largest oil producer as well, and now this year too they regained that spot... In 1998, they were the 3rd largest, so this is a hefty jump...

Faisal, found the link… But this is the one where they regained the second spot, and the 1st spot as an energy producer, ill try to get the other one too…

http://www.dawn.com/2002/02/03/ebr12.htm

Russia regains leading place on world energy map

By Syed Rashid Husain

DHAHRAN, Feb 2: The global energy equilibrium is changing. Russia, over the last few years has regained its position as a potent force on the global energy map.

It is now only second to Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter. The change in the equilibrium is going to have profound impact on the world oil market, many here in Dhahran, the virtual global energy capital believes.

Despite the recent agreement between the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) and Russia over the issue of cut in production, to stem the downward trend in oil market prices, analysts fear that compromise could only be a short lull in a long confrontation.

Many here believe “compromise” that has resulted from this trial of strength between Opec and Russia is far from a solution to the fundamental problem that divides the two sides over production levels and the market shares.

The problem arises from the fact that, after nearly nine years of decline Russia is determined to regain the leading place it used to enjoy on the world energy map. According to Julian Lee of the London based Centre for Global Energy Studies, the recent increase in Russia’s oil production have mainly come from Russian oil companies, which have benefited greatly from the high oil prices of 2000 and 2001.

“The additional income from the higher oil process was invested back into the mainstream oil industry resulting in the increased output. Despite the calls, there seems to be little investment from the foreign oil companies in the Russian oil sector. They still find the investment climate in Russia unattractive,” Julian Lee, CGES specialist on Russian oil affairs, told Dawn in reply to queries about the state of Russian oil industry.

In the late 1980s, Russia was world’s leading oil exporter and its production reached a high of 11.4 million barrels per day (bpd) in 1987-88. In the space of nine years, its output plunged by 44.6 per cent, dropping to just 6.2 million bpd in 1996, before recovering to 6.5 million bpd in 2000 and 7.1 million in 2001. The expected figure for 2002 Russian output is 7.35 million bpd in 2002, estimated Julian Lee.

Energy analysts believe the recovery in global market oil prices during the last two years, the reorganization of the Russian oil sector launched in 1992-93 and the devaluation of the ruble - Russian currency, made this significant increase in Russian crude output and hence export feasible.

Given that over 85 per cent of oil and gas investments took place in the ruble, the devaluation of the currency enabled the Russian companies to reduce their costs by 50 to 75 per cent. In the case of Lukoil, for instance, its production costs expressed in foreign currency thus fell from $7.40 to $2.70 per barrel.

In the recent years Russian companies have spent a lot of money developing new production capacity and the resistance to any output cut from the Russian oil industry was because these companies now want to start earning returns on these investments. Also it was difficult to shut-in production in Siberia, particularly during winter, without running the risk of losing it altogether; pumps seize up, wells close and it could be very expensive to bring them back into production again.

“Also the Russian oil companies can produce their oil profitably at $17 per barrel prices, experienced towards the end of 2001. It was for this reason also that the Russian oil companies were strongly against any Russian output cut, as was demanded by the OPEC,” Julian Lee emphasized.

In the coming years Russia would stay as a major player in global oil market, at times competing against Opec with fiercely divergent interests. Its proven crude oil reserves are currently put at over 48 billion barrels, while “remaining reserves” are estimated at 137-147 billion barrels. In addition to that, recoverable reserves remaining to be discovered amount to some 77 billion barrels of crude oil and 40 billion barrels of condensate, according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS).

Because of recent improvements undertaken to modernize the face of the Russian oil industry and other initiatives currently underway, it is more than apparent to the analysts here that Russia would remain the world’s largest oil producer and exporter after Saudi Arabia for a good many years to come.

This is why some analysts believe that equivocal compromise announced with Opec more looks like a short lull in a long showdown that could see many rebounds in future.

Another factor worth considering in this direction is that the rapprochement between Russia and the United States in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks has opened way to close cooperation between the two states in areas such as the participation of American oil companies in the development of the Russian hydrocarbon industry and the export of oil and gas from Central Asia. This would give an unprecedented boost to the fortunes of the Russian oil industry.

Consequently, many believe that a coordinated output policy between Russia and the Opec may not be that simple and the equation will become even less so with the expected increase in Russia’s oil production and exports in the coming months and years. Opec in future may have to take the Russian sensitivities more in account before taking any initiative in the oil market, analysts strongly believe here.

Saudi, Iran, Central asia,Nigeria, Algeria,Libya and iraq is where the majority of the oil and gas resources are in the world and all these are muslim countries.

They have the weapon and they can use it there is no doubt about that!

But problem as many people have said is that we have the most corrupt sold out rulers who don't give a damn even if there people are starving or killed.

even malaysia produces oil not as much as the others but point being matahir can see it clearly because it so obvious even the average muslim in the street knows about the oil weapon!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Saif1924: *
Saudi, Iran, Central asia,Nigeria, Algeria,Libya and iraq is where the majority of the oil and gas resources are in the world and all these are muslim countries.

They have the weapon and they can use it there is no doubt about that!

But problem as many people have said is that we have the most corrupt sold out rulers who don't give a damn even if there people are starving or killed.

even malaysia produces oil not as much as the others but point being matahir can see it clearly because it so obvious even the average muslim in the street knows about the oil weapon!
[/QUOTE]

Some of these countries you mentioned have large christian populations, almost as large as the muslims, would they be so eager to do that?