Mosque:a building used for public worship by Muslims
No prayers had been offered in Babri Masjid for decades, not to forget the fact that it was built by demolishing a Hindu temple. It was simply a building that was demolished.
No prayers had been offered in Babri Masjid for decades, not to forget the fact that it was built by demolishing a Hindu temple. It was simply a building that was demolished.
No prayers offered in that mosque, it was because of the conflict involved (and probably city/state government forcing closure) not because it was abandoned. and other part of your claim was investigated AFTER the demolition of mosque.
There is archaeological evidence to back the claim: in the 1970s, a team of the Archaeological Survey of India led by Prof. B.B. Lal dug out some trenches just outside the mosque and found rows of pillar-bases which must have supported a larger building predating the mosque. Moreover, in the mosque itself, small black pillars with Hindu sculptures had been incorporated, a traditional practice in mosques built in forcible replacement of infidel temples to flaunt the victory of Islam over Paganism.
Answer this - how many Muslims would tolerate a Hindu temple in Mecca ?
No prayers had been offered in Babri Masjid for decades, not to forget the fact that it was built by demolishing a Hindu temple. It was simply a building that was demolished.
Let us leave that work to archeologists and historitians..... it is quite better to leave the abandoned building as it is rather than stain it the blood of so many people.
it was stupid on our part to spend our energy and time on the issue like babri masjid.. we definately have other serious things to look after. don't we??
No prayers had been offered in Babri Masjid for decades, not to forget the fact that it was built by demolishing a Hindu temple. It was simply a building that was demolished.
True but it was still a muslim symbol. Basicaly BJP stood up for the Hindus then if I may say so.
I understand there was a Hindu Temple there before. But it still doesnt justify what was done. For instance if my grand parents owned the property in the 1920s, later on down the road u bought the property built a house there with a mutal understanding between u and my grandparents. During the 70's u moved out and abondoned the house. Do I have the right to scrap ur house just because I think you pressurized by grand parents and got hold of the property. Also using the same logic lets say 20 years from now would it be right for someone to scrap whatever is standing on that property and build a mosque.... I guess then its a never ending problem.
I see what you are saying but what I am trying to say is that BJP should have considered a secular approach to this issue with India being a secular state. Instead they choose to take the Hindus sides that kinda left the muslims cornered and left out.
Note: Incidents like these harbor terrorists regardless of whoever is on the receiving end.
The link doesn’t show the report was in 1970s. Anyway, even if the report was, the act of demolition should’ve been carried out by the state/government and not political parties which only means rubbing someone’s nose.
Personally, I agree. However, Muslim groups could also have tried to understand the majority's feelings that this was a Hindu religious site and that they had anywas not been offering namaz at that site. Its was the belligerent attitude of both groups that led to this incident.
Unfortunately, the way things work in India is that we try & set right wrongs that were done centuries ago. The whole reservations for backward classes is an example of that policy.
Unfortunately, the way things work in India is that we try & set right wrongs that were done centuries ago. The whole reservations for backward classes is an example of that policy.
Guys, this is not the forum, i think, you should discuss all this. you are actually deviating from the subject..
forgive if you don't like the suggetion....
Thank you for the suggestion, I participated as I thought it was not far a tangent from original discussion.