So the people killed in massacres have been criminal or terrorist themselves? All those women/children/elderly killed were terrorists? Doesn't the definition of terrorism mean 'terrorising' population? Does it have to be a suicidal bombing? You disappionted me.
Muslim fundamentalism is immediately called as terrorism, but Hindu fundamentalism in retalition is just 'communal', wah wah.
Motive... to make Indian muslims rebelious to their own GOVT. Apparently it didnt work. Similar tactics have been deployed by both parties for years now. Nothing new. Raw and ISI need to get a life and for once do something productive if this was conducted by either parties.
Terrorist - A radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities
if that is true, pakistan must be the terrorist state, as you have proclaimed yourself the islamic state and supporting groups like taliban and al-quaida just because they are muslim in origin.
mind well, those who abet terrorism are also terrorists.
mind well, those who abet terrorism are also terrorists.
And thats why I only believe in Nationalism... Pakistan should only support Pakistanis and whats best for Pakistan not anyone who shares the same religious cirlce.
Muslim fundamentalism is immediately called as terrorism, but Hindu fundamentalism in retalition is just 'communal', wah wah.
well, i just want to say that hindu fundamentalism just don't have the state support like the muslim fundamentalism have. say from pakistan. There is whole state ruled by muslim fundamentalist group like afghanistan. hindu fundamentalism is contained by the secular hindus. there are always miscreants but they are few. can u say the same thing about muslim fundamentalism??
All I will say to that is with the muslims outnumbering Hindus, Muslims are more likeley to be active in all aspects more than Hindus. Sadly but truely our skeptical minds only let us see the bad and ignore the good. There are muslims who are doing good just like the most Hindus... sadly all of that is overlooked when one dumb muslim blows up something or when one Hindu does something wrong. I would also like to point out the fact that majority of muslims are uneducated and poor. With no money in the pokect and an empty brain one is bound to do things to which the main stream will never agree.
I am not advocating terrorism but only rationalizing it.
Again, your whole definition of terrorism revolves around only and only Pakistan. What about terrorism in Philippines? Does state support it? What about in Indonesia? What about in IRA? Did KKK had state support of US?
now that u quoted this organisation, please examine the matter in details. what is diffrence between KKK and Taliban. why taliban can take control of afghanistan?? why laskhar-e- taiyyaba can have a radio station in Lahore?? that's what i mean by state support.
And KKK is almost dead in the US. They are limited to a few rallies a year in the midwest. Imagine KKK doing an LeT, and the US govt. staying mum about it the way Pak govt. does.
again i want to put it this way. BJP haven't exploded bombs or killed innocents not they abeted any criminal or terrorist organisation. They are not anti-muslim also. It is just that they have cirtain philosophy and doesn't believe in special rights to minority. See.......the issues they opposed are like abolishment of special status to J&K or allowing more than two child by muslims on religious basis..
and they have attain their aim by democratic procedure called elections not by terrorism. again, let me remind you freedom of speech is important part of indian democracy.
again i want to put it this way. BJP haven't exploded bombs or killed innocents not they abeted any criminal or terrorist organisation. They are not anti-muslim also. It is just that they have cirtain philosophy and doesn't believe in special rights to minority. See.......the issues they opposed are like abolishment of special status to J&K or allowing more than two child by muslims on religious basis..
and they have attain their aim by democratic procedure called elections not by terrorism. again, let me remind you freedom of speech is important part of indian democracy.
If I am not wrong a few BJP figures were involded directly with the Babri Mosque incident.
Again, you are back to focusing on Pakistan. The definition of terrorism doesn't include any state sponsorship. There is terrorism and there is state-sponsored terrorism, both are terrorism.