MUSLIMS IN AMERICA SHOULD INFLUENCE ELECTION-U R DUTY

Subj: msa-net: Boston Globe: MUSLIMS EYE ROLE AT US POLLS
Date: 10/23/00 5:09:26 PM EST
00/ <Message Length: 185 lines>
Bismillah Walhamdulillah Was Salaatu Was Salaam 'ala Rasulillah

The Boston Globe, October 23, 2000

MUSLIMS EYE ROLE AT US POLLS

BYLINE: By Michael Paulson, Globe Staff

DEARBORN, Mich. - The Iraqi-born Muslim cleric paces across the
university classroom, his green tunic and black cape sweeping across the
floor, as, spicing his adopted English with phrases from his native Arabic,
he urges the students to vote.

How else can they persuade the US government to reduce its support for
Israel? To halt the alleged singling out of Muslims and Arab-Americans for
interrogation at US airports? To stop the use of secret evidence to justify
the detention of suspected terrorists?

“We should pursue our rights in a society we choose to live in,” said
Imam Hassan Qazwini. “If I keep myself excluded, I am not influencing
anybody.”

His point seems obvious enough, but some of the students are having none of
it. From the back of the male side of the room - the students have separated
themselves by gender - several launch an attack, accusing Qazwini of
usurping the authority of Allah and proposing an un-Islamic action that
cannot be justified by the Koran.

“God forbids any Muslim from participating in the legislation of a
non-Islamic state,” argued Danny Agemy, 25, a marketing major here at the
University of Michigan-Dearborn. After the lecture, Agemy stations himself
by the door, handing out brochures calling voting “treason against Islam”
and citing four verses from the Koran as evidence for his contention that
voting is a sin.

The Muslim population in the United States is estimated at roughly 6
million - larger than the Jewish population, which many Muslim voters see as
having too much sway over US policy on the Middle East. The Muslim community
is growing rapidly as a result of conversion, immigration, and a high birth
rate.

This is the year that Muslim leaders hope will mark the emergence of
American Muslims as a new, and eventually powerful, voting bloc in a nation
where identity politics is a time-honored method for effecting change.

But Muslim leaders have faced a number of challenges in fashioning a group
of voters that speaks with one voice. Most American Muslims are relatively
new to this country and inexperienced in the ways of democracy. Many are
frustrated that neither political party seems supportive of their interests.
And the community in some parts of the United States is divided along ethnic
lines as Arab-Americans, South Asian-Americans, and African-Americans.

"Because Islam, and especially immigrant Muslims, are not part of the
dominant Judeo-Christian culture of this country, they very much are
challenged here, and some have responded by saying, ‘To hell with the rest,
we’re going to keep to our own,’ " said Hassan Jaber, deputy director of the
the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services in Dearborn. “You
still see mosques here that do not encourage the movement of political
activism - they see it as betraying their culture and religion, and as
threatening their purity. But these are in the minority.”

Take a walk down Warren Avenue in Dearborn, through the heart of Michigan’s
300,000-strong Arab-American community, and you will see a typical picture
of the state of Muslims throughout the country: Some can’t vote because they
aren’t citizens yet, some won’t vote because they think it’s useless or
wrong, and the rest are divided among Democrat Al Gore, Republican George W.
Bush, and Green Party nominee Ralph Nader, who enjoys relatively high
ratings among Muslims because he is Lebanese-American and because he is
neither Gore nor Bush.

The avenue is lined with shops selling “halal” meat, slaughtered according
to Islamic law, and Arab restaurants, bakeries, doctors’ offices, and shops.
Even the CVS on Warren Avenue has a sign in Arabic.

At the Alsalam Supermarket, a tiny grocery store overflowing with fruits and
vegetables, manager Andy Deebaja, a native of Lebanon, said it is important
to vote because “you have to deliver your message to leaders.”

Deebaja plans to vote for Bush, saying, “I like his policies, especially for
the Middle East - I think he’ll be less tough on the Middle East. Al Gore
appointed a vice president that’s Jewish, and that’s a big sign. That’s why
I’m going to vote for Bush.”

Down the street, at a medical office where a soccer game between Lebanon and
Thailand is being broadcast in Arabic, Dr. Fadel M. Ali expects to vote for
Nader. “Gore and Bush are both in a race to favor Israel, to affect the
Jewish vote,” he said.

Ali would not consider not voting. “We have reached a point that, to make
any change, you have to go through the system,” he said. “America is a
multicultural society, and you should take your rights to speak and object.
If we put our influence into the media and financial institutions and work
hard, we can make change.”

Across town last Tuesday, in the leafy suburb of Dearborn Heights, the local
sheriff, the mayor, a candidate for county commission, and a Gore campaign
surrogate stopped at a debate-watching party for Arab-American movers and
shakers hosted by Jumana Judeh, a Palestinian-born Christian who is a member
of the Dearborn Heights City Council.

But the debate watchers were not impressed by the candidates, neither of
whom spoke about issues of concern to Muslims.

American Muslims have not found an ideological home in either the Democratic
or the Republican party, and in 1996 the Muslim vote was split evenly
between the parties, said Yvonne Y. Haddad, a professor of the history of
Islam at Georgetown University.

With an eye toward the likely future clout of this group, both parties are
reaching out to Muslim voters, as well as Arab-American Christians. This
year President Clinton spoke at a Ramadan celebration at the White House.
Muslim clerics have delivered prayers at Congress and the national political
conventions. And Gore and Bush have both met with Muslim leaders.

Today the American Muslim Political Coordinating Council Political Action
Committee plans to endorse a candidate for president, although it is not
clear how many Muslim voters will take their cue from such an endorsement.
Many Muslims expect the national group to endorse Bush, who scored points
among some Muslims by saying that he was concerned about potentially
discriminatory antiterrorism practices during the second debate with Gore,
and because many Muslims are also skeptical about Democratic vice
presidential nominee Joe Lieberman’s willingness to be helpful to
Palestinians because he is Jewish.

Evidence of increasing Muslim political involvement is widespread. Many
mosques have held voter registration drives. Muslims are running for a raft
of local offices. They have sent delegates to both presidential conventions
this year, and affluent ones are contributing to political parties and
candidates.

“The debate here is not over, but it is slowly and steadily tilting in favor
of the notion that Muslims are here, they are citizens, and voting is part
of their responsibility for the welfare of the society,” said Zahid H.
Bukhari, director of the Pew Charitable Trust’s Muslims in the American
Public Square research project. “And this election is much more important
than any previous election for Muslims. Because it is a close election,
Muslims feel they have more strength and that they are in a better position
to get recognition that they should have some say.”

Ihsan A. Bagby of Shaw University in North Carolina, a scholar who
researches Islam in America, recently surveyed American mosque leaders and
found that 89 percent say Muslims should participate in US elections.

“That’s much higher than many Muslims would assume,” Bagby said. “There’s a
reluctance to get involved because politics are dirty overseas and they’re
perceived as being dirty here, and there is the issue of whether it’s
Islamically approved for Muslims to get involved. But this shows Muslim
leaders are not as isolationist or separatist or conservative as many would
think.”

But the minority of Muslims who disapprove of voting are doing so
vociferously. In addition to citing what they say are Koranic prohibitions
against voting, some Muslims voice more practical concerns: They are
unwilling to vote for candidates who support Israel, support abortion
rights, or support an embargo against Iraq that they contend is leading to
the deaths of Iraqi civilians.

A newsletter being circulated in Muslim cafes in Michigan blasts mainstream
Muslim organizations; it reports on the decision of a Muslim cleric to
deliver a prayer at the Republican National Convention under the headline,
“Muslims bless child-killers” - a reference to GOP support for the embargo
against Iraq.

And an electronic bulletin board maintained by the Muslim Students
Association (www.msadearborn.org) is hosting a debate over voting. One
critic of voting wrote, “Once you enter the process, you agree to play by
their rules, and from here on in, you become another begging minority.”

Qazwini, the cleric in the classroom, expressed envy, admiration, and
hostility toward Jews, as did many other Muslims interviewed for this
report. Qazwini repeatedly referred to the influence of the “Jewish lobby”
in the United States. “We don’t like to admit it, but the success of Jewish
people has inspired us,” he said. “We learn from them lobbying, how to be
organized, how to flood newspapers with letters, how to approach
politicians. But we are not matching them in our influence. They have more
experience.”

Qazwini dismissed many of the students’ concerns as the exuberance of youth.
He insisted that the Koran does not prohibit voting and that practical
concerns require it. “There are some young, heated, vigilant boys and girls
who are very upset about what’s going on in the Middle East,” he said. “I am
angry, too, but to be passive and negative is not the way. When you
participate, you will force them to listen to you.”

_


Obviously there are some ultra orthodox views,rather impractical neverteless of muslims ,as fairness ,i offer ,hope you can see the light your self by using your ijtidad.I'm sunni &have no schism in me or agenda.

Why the Kuffar Want Muslims To Vote

Islam is an ideological system of life that in contradiction to every
man-made system on earth. Islam is from the Creator while man-made beliefs
and systems are not. Islam has a system of life solely based on the Islamic
`Aqeedah while the man-made beliefs and system are not. Islam does not
believe in being dominated but in being implemented as the only legitimate
ideology the Creator allowed for mankind. Islam does not believe that man
has the right to be legislator for other men, because Islam believes that
only Allah has the right to legislate laws for His Creation including
mankind:

"The 'Hukm' (rule, decision) belongs only to Allaah." (al-qur'aan, 12:67)

Islam believes that true justice can only be achieved when enjoining "maruf"
(all that is good allowed in Islam) and forbidding "munkar" (all that is
evil). The only way to achieve this (enjoining the ma
ruf and forbidding the
munkar) is when Islam is completely implemented and enforced. Islam forbids
ruling by other than what Allah has revealed:

"And rule between them by that which Allaah has revealed and follow not vain
desires, diverging away from the truth that has come to you." (al-qur'aan,
5:48)

"And rule between them by that which Allaah has revealed and follow not their
vain desires, but beware that they may turn you away from some of what Allaah
has revealed." (al-qur'aan, 5:49)

Allah describes those who do not rule by what He has revealed:

"And whosoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed they are kaafiruun."
(al-qur'aan, 5:44)

"And whosoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed they are
DHaalimuun." (al-qur'aan, 5:45)

"And whosoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed they are faasiquun."
(al-qur'aan, 5:47)

Remember that when Allah said in the ayah that who does not rule by what
Allah has revealed are Kuffar (Quran, 5:44), Allah is talking about those who
do not believe in Islam. When Allah mentions the word "DHaalimun" in 5:45 it
refers to both the Muslim and non-Muslim who do not rule by what Allah has
revealed. Finally, when Allah says the word "Faasiqun," it refers to the
sinful, rebellious person (specifically a Muslim) who does not rule by what
Allah has revealed.

Allah described the Muslims as being the best community that ever came out of
mankind WHEN they enjoin the ma`ruf and forbid the munkar:

"You (Muslims) are the best nation ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin the
ma`ruuf and forbid the munkar and you believe in Allaah." (al-qur'aan, 3:110)

The Ummah cannot be divided into many nations and countries all with
different rulers, especially when all of them at the present moment do not
rule by all of what Allah has revealed:

"Hold fast to the Rope of Allaah and do not divide among yourselves."

(al-qur'aan, 3:103)

"When the oath of allegiance (bai`ah) has been taken for two Caliphs, kill
that latter of them." (Sahih Muslim)

"Whosoever pledged allegiance (bai`ah) to an Imaam giving him the clasp of
his hand and the fruit of of his heart shall obey him as long as he can. If
another comes to dispute with that man, you must strike the neck of that
man." (Sahih Muslim)

"Whosoever comes to you while your affair has been united under one man
intending to divide your staff or dissolve your unity, kill him." (Sahih
Muslim)

Despite the numerous evidences from the Quran and Sunnah, many Muslims today
unfortunately are spearheading efforts for the participation of Muslims in
the kufr political system. Many Muslims have called upon other Muslims to
vote and be active in the kufr political system, even to the point of trying
to run for a political office.

What has happened to the mentality of these Muslims that made them hold such
unIslamic views and practice in Haraam activities such as voting for a person
that will not rule by what Allah has revealed?

Muslims had sunk to the lowest depths of decline since the destruction of the
Caliphate. Muslims are divided into over 50 countries, they are waging wars
against each other, placing and observing embargoes on fellow Muslims despite
Muhammad (saaw) saying that it is not allowed to abandon a fellow Muslim for
more than three days. Moreover, the Kuffar poisoned our minds with the
ideology and belief system they imposed on us, giving us agents and other
puppet rulers who are one of the most oppressors rulers the Ummah has ever
seen, and making us the most backward and pitiful nation on the face of the
earth. We are no longer the leading, best nation on earth. We are no longer
the feared "superpower." We are begging the Kuffar for assistance and
"protection" when the Kuffar on many occasions asked us for assistance and
protection when we had the system of Islam ruling the earth. We depend on
the West not vice versa. All of these results are due to a lack of the
implementation of Islam and the Ummah insistence to disobey Allah by
embracing kufr. We deserve this humiliation when we disobey Allah.

Despite the disastrous effects of accepting kufr over Islam, many, many
Muslims insist on promoting such evil that did nothing but betray the Ummah
and put us through unbelievable suffering and grief.

One must be aware that the Kuffar realize Islam to a point that they do not
treat it as just "another religion." It is sad to see the Kuffar seem to
know more about the nature of Islam than many Muslims. Islam is an ideology
and it seen as a potential ideological threat by the Kuffar. Islam is not
capitalistic nor socialistic. Islam is not a democracy or a theocracy.

Islam is not a republic or a despotic regime. Islam is its unique own
ideology that does not resemble other ideologies such as Capitalism or
Communism. As in other ideologies, Islam does not accept being dominated
over but being dominant.

The nature of Islam should make the Kuffar politicians and leaders worried
because no longer can they oppress the people with corrupt, man-made laws
that contradict human nature and do not properly organize the affairs and
needs of mankind. No longer will things like "interest" be allowed. The
exploitation of our lands and the stealing of its resource by the Kaafir West
will not be tolerated. The oppression of the Muslims by the hands of the
Kuffar will dealt with in such a decisive way that the Kuffar will think
twice before trying to attack us. The sexual exploitation of women will be a
thing of the past. And most important, no man-made system or ideology will
be allowed rule the earth except the Divine ideology of Islam.

This is what the Kuffar fears the most; Muslims who are calling for such a
system and who might be successful in establishing the Caliphate that will
implement such a system.

Now the Kuffar must ask themselves, "How do we deal with this potential
'threat'?"

The Kuffar have cleverly devised ways of "curbing" the potential "threat" of
the return of the Islamic system of life. The Kuffar realizes that in many
of its countries, they have a large population of Muslims, many of them being
immigrants from the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. So to deal with this
large segment of the population, the Kuffar wanted to somehow make Muslims
feel "welcome" in their new country by assimilating them in their society in
order to make them think and act like them. They want these Muslims to view
Islam as just another religion. They want Muslims to see "no contradiction"
with Islam and secularism. They want Muslim "leaders" to pass edicts
"allowing" the participation of Muslims in their political system so that the
Muslims won't be busy calling for Muslims to call for Islam's own political
system. They want Muslims to see their participation in their kufr systems
as somewhat compatible with Islam, even to the point of trying to make
participating in their system an "obligation." Commands in the Quran such as
"enjoining good and forbidding wrong" are often used to try to justify voting
for a politician who some Muslims believe will "enjoin good and forbid
wrong."

The Kuffar have been open to a certain extent in their intentions and plans
in trying to Muslims assimilated and integrated in their societies. Many
books and articles have been written on the issue of how to find the best way
to assimilate Muslim thus "preventing a potential threat of an Islamic
ideological movement in their own countries trying to usurp its system with
that of Islam." One of the best books on this issue is A Sense of Siege: The
Geopolitics of Islam and the West by Ian O. Lesser and Graham E. Fuller
(Westview Press/A Rand Study, 1995). In it, it makes several striking
revelations:

The American Moslem Council in Washington has a major mission to "to get
American Moslems in the political system and organize them into a powerful
lobby capable of gaining Moslem rights under the American Constitution." A
group of Islamic scholars is working in Los Angeles "minority jurisprudence,"
"an interpretation of Islamic texts that will allow Moslems to make some
religious concession to meet American culture halfway." [pg. 93]
It will be nearly impossible for Islam to play the formal institutional role
in daily life in a non-Muslim setting. Indeed, Islam in the West is also
likely to become more "secularized," that is, set apart from the government
and social institutions, and to evolve increasingly into the expression of
personal faith and conduct rather than a set of laws for society. In short,
the presence of Islam in the West may hasten its move toward a process
similar to the Christian Reformation. [pg. 88]

In short, major adjustments may be underway in the character of Muslim
societies abroad. These developments may have considerable impact on the
evolution of Islamic religious and political thinking in the Middle East as a
result, for the same question raised there, even in the Muslim cultural
context. Just what are implications of secular governments in the Middle
East?... The West has now become one of the primary laboratories for rapid,
virtually "forced" Islamic evolution. [pg. 93]

Over the long run, however, assimilation into American society seems
relatively straightforward and within the general context of the American
assimilation of immigrants-a process perhaps less smooth in the European
context and experience. [pg. 95]

In blunt terms, Islam in the West faces two basic alternative: Euro-Islam or
ghetto-Islam. Euro-Islam implies the choice of full Muslim integration into
European society (to the extent Europeans socially permit it) while
preserving Islam as a matter of personal faith and cultural preference. The
alternative, ghetto-Islam is to seek to recreate Islamic society, even with
its religiously imposed social prescriptions, within the European society on
the basis of separatism. [pg. 90]

In sum, Islam as a faith is not a problem. The battle is over the uses of
Islam. The challenge is to develop tactics by which extremist or fringe
religious elements can legally be politically sidelined without violence or
repression. [pg. 106]

In several articles the techniques and methods of dealing with the Muslims
are discussed. In an article in the Baltimore Sun (7/7/92), "Time to Paint
U.S.-Islamic Relations on a Brand New Canvas" offers some of the following
strategies in dealing with the Muslims:

"Stop talking about the 'world of Islam' as if it were a monolithic whole;
instead use 'Muslim countries."
"Emphasize the common elements and values that unite Islam and Christianity
and avoid divisive factors."

Now in countries like France already are trying to pioneer a type of "French
Islam" where "Islam" is compatible to the French way of life. In an article
in the L.A. Times (1/8/92) and the New York Times (1/24/92), it discussed
about plans to build a school for Muslims in Europe:

"Despite its modest start, the institute's sponsors, including wealthy
contributors from Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf oil states, hope that
eventually the school will have 200 elite students and serve as one of the
main centers of learning for Europe's 25 million Muslims, including those
living in such countries as Albania, Bulgaria, and Yugoslavia..."
The proposed solution is to create a European form of Islam that can coexist
comfortably with the Western societies shaped by Christian traditions...

'With the complexity of life today,' said Zuhair Mahmoud, 39, the institute
director, 'we need a place to teach and explain Islam in a European
context... What we need is a modern and moderate Islam... For example, the
punishments mentioned in the Quran are not relevant. We can accept
secularity, monogamy...

We admire the civil traditions of Europe-its great principle of democracy,
freedom, and reason... We will give Islam as interpretation that is most
adaptive to European society. We feel that our Jewish friends once faced the
same intolerance we face today... Islam will be accepted as Judaism..."
Three years later in the New York Times (October 29, 1995) it reported on the
situation of the Muslims in France:

Despite rightists demands that the immigrants be sent home, the government
knows that they are here to stay. But it also believes that if France is not
to feel permanently threatened by imported Islamic extremism, a French
version of Islam must take root. And it is looking to the new mosque here to
help that happen.
"We now realize that Islam in France is a French reality and not just a
foreign issue or an extension of foreign problems," France's Interior
Minister, Charles Pasqua, said at the Mosque's inauguration. "So it is not
enough to have an Islam in France. There should be a French Islam."

By that, he said, he meant an Islam that respected France's republican
principles, that recognized the rights of men and women, that did not view
France as a "space to conquer..."

Already the government is promoting formation of French born Imams to replace
those brought from abroad, and it wants Muslims to form a national
organization with the French state can deal.

The response from the mosque's elders was one Mr. Pasqua wanted.

"This mosque will be permanent proof that Islam is a religion that can be
practiced in strict adherence to french law" said Rabah Kheliff, a French
citizen who heads the Islamic-French Cultural Association of Lyons, which
runs the mosque.

The Mosque's grand Mufti, AbdelHamid Chirane, an Algerian born scholar who
has spent the past 30 years in France, said he stood "midway between two
cultures-the marvels of the Koran and the culture of Descartes." "I think
this is the beginning of a French Islam," Mr. Chirane said.

As we have seen, attempts by the Kuffar to make Muslims assimilate into their
way of life and thinking is happening everywhere in the world. From the
attempts to make Muslims "mainstream law-abiding citizens" to creating and
promoting Westernized, diluted and twisted versions of "Islam" that is
compatible with the kufr beliefs and systems, the enemies of Islam are
attacking Islam not on a "my religion is better than your religion" level,
but on an ideological level that appears far more innocent than sinister.

But their attempts in creating a twisted version of "Islam" to making Muslims
view their deen as just a religion that can accept the rule of kufr over them
is very sinister indeed and is intended to make the return of the
implementation of Islam something that will never happen. And as we all know
the enemies of Islam do not want to see the Laws of Allah ruling the earth.
We Muslims must be fully aware of the plots of the Kuffar against the
Muslims. We cannot accept the status quo of kufr being dominant today. The
Ummah is in sin by not implementing the Laws of Allah. We cannot abandon the
blessed, perfect, just system of Islam for the corrupt, evil, treacherous
system of kufr that has the Muslims and the rest of the world in a big mess.

We cannot be slaves of the West nor can the Kuffar be our masters. We cannot
accept their systems and beliefs in which Allah did not reveal but something
that Allah has cursed. We must return to obeying our Creator fulfilling our
duty to Him and lifting the humiliation that Allah put on us for disobeying
Him.