The manner in which people support evolution is the fault of the people not of the theory. I don’t judge Islamic scripture based on how people follow it. Flawed logic.
You go to very deep lengths to defend the common scholars with elaborations they themselves fail to provide. Most Islamic scholars don’t know the difference between ethanol and sorbitol (both are alcohols). Only a very few scholars I’ve come across who are actually educated enough to make this distinction, and they put it out clearly. The average scholar will say “don’t wear perfume that has alcohol”, not even knowing the alcohol in the perfume isn’t the one found in beverages. You can pretend to defend them by saying what they haven’t said themselves but that makes no difference.
I see no qualm. The evolutionary theory suggests evolution from common ancestors; in the case of the human evolution, the theory is completely inline with the Islamic scripture that states that all humans descended from Adam (the common ancestor).
What’s the problem?