I’m totally glad justice prevailed. Just like in the other thread for bikers’ causing disturbance outside masjid, I said all muslims need to do is put their head down and do their work legally, honestly and respectfully. No need to retaliate. This 8-1 decision is certainly a proof that even if you are discriminated or bullied, you keep patience and try to get legal help. It’ll be all good.
A big Yaayy to US justice system! :k:
Muslim Woman Denied Job Over Head Scarf Wins in Supreme CourtBy ADAM LIPTAKJUNE 1, 2015
Photo
" data-mediaviewer-credit=“Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images” itemprop=“url” itemid=“http://static01.nyt.com/images/2015/06/02/us/02COURTWEB/02COURTWEB-master675.jpg” style=“height: auto; max-width: 100%; display: block; width: 675px;”>
Samantha Elauf, her mother, Majda Elauf, and David Lopez, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s general counsel, after the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in her case against Abercrombie & Fitch in February.
CreditChip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesAdvertisement
Continue reading the main story
Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday revived an employment discrimination lawsuit against Abercrombie & Fitch, which had refused to hire a Muslim woman because she wore a head scarf.
“This is really easy,” Justice Antonin Scalia said in announcing the decision from the bench.
The company at least suspected that the woman, Samantha Elauf, wore the head scarf for religious reasons, Justice Scalia said, and its decision not to hire her was motivated by a desire to avoid accommodating her religious practice. That was enough, he concluded, to allow her to sue under federal employment discrimination law.
The vote was 8-to-1, with Justice Clarence Thomas dissenting.
The case started in 2008, when Ms. Elauf, then 17, applied for a job in a children’s clothing store owned by Abercrombie & Fitch at the Woodland Hills Mall in Tulsa, Okla. She wore a black head scarf but did not say why.
The company declined to hire her, saying her scarf clashed with the company’s dress code, which called for a “classic East Coast collegiate style.” After the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued on Ms. Elauf’s behalf, the company said it had no reason to know that Ms. Elauf’s head scarf, a hijab, was required by her faith.
In its Supreme Court brief in the case, E.E.O.C. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, No. 14-86, the company argued that job applicants should not be allowed “to remain silent and to assume that the employer recognizes the religious motivations behind their fashion decisions.”
After the case was argued in February, an Abercrombie spokesman said the company “has a longstanding commitment to diversity and inclusion, and consistent with the law has granted numerous religious accommodations when requested, including hijabs.”
The Supreme Court ruled that Ms. Elauf did not have to make a specific request for a religious accommodation to obtain relief under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits religious discrimination in hiring.
Continue reading the main storyAt the trial, Ms. Elauf said she loved movies, shopping, sushi and the mall. “It’s like my second home,” she said. Her experience with Abercrombie, she said, made her feel “disrespected because of my religious beliefs.”
Continue reading the main storyEmployment Discrimination
The court decided in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores that Samantha Elauf was not required to make a specific request for a religious accommodation to wear a hijab when applying for a position at a children’s clothing store owned by the company.
8-1
MAJORITY
Sotomayor
Kagan
Ginsburg
Breyer
Kennedy
Roberts
Scalia
Alito
Thomas
• The company declined to hire Ms. Elauf, saying her scarf clashed with the company’s dress code. It maintained that it should not have been made to guess that she wore a head scarf for religious reasons.
Continue reading the main story
“I was born in the United States,” she said, “and I thought I was the same as everyone else.”
CONTINUE READING THE MAIN STORYA jury awarded Ms. Elauf $20,000.
But the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, in Denver,ruled for the company.
“Ms. Elauf never informed Abercrombie prior to its hiring decision that she wore her head scarf, or ‘hijab,’ for religious reasons,” Judge Jerome A. Holmes wrote for the court.