Re: Muslim sister disables anti islam websites
Democracy isn't perfect, but it's about as close as it gets. And don't you think it is unfair to compare laws like the Blasphemy Law (which has been repeatedly used to persecute Christians) with laws like the Burka Ban? I doubt any French Muslim has been killed as a result of the law.
Also, I agree that the majority may often be wrong or misled, but that's the way it works. The merits of the democratic system far outweigh it's short comings (like the scenario being discussed here). BTW, most of the people of Pakistan do not believe that Anti-Ahmedi Law and Blasphemy Law are in the wrong.
Everyone has a different perspective. I think that the Hudood Ordinance, Inheritance Law and in fact, ALL ISLAMIC BASED laws in the constitution shouldn't be there; Pakistan should be secular. From my perspective, the majority of Pakistan's population are wrong. From theirs, I'm a RAW/Mossad agent.
For Muslims to adopt democracy means to disbelieve in all - may Allah forbid - the decisive and conclusive evidences, among which are many Qur’anic verses which oblige them to follow the law of Allah and to reject any other law.
The Kafiroon and their agents who rule the Muslim countries, as well as all those who call for democracy, realise that the basis for democracy is the rejection of the law of Allah and putting man in the place of the Creator. For this reason, they do not present democracy from this perspective, but instead claim that democracy means people ruling themselves by themselves, with equality and justice prevailing among the people, and the accountability of the ruler guaranteed. Although democracy explicitly implies the rejection of the laws of Allah and following the law of His creation, the advocates of democracy intentionally avoid addressing the issue of rejecting the law of Allah.
In the West Democratic politicians urge the electorate the promise that success and happiness lie in the future. Both U.S. presidential candidates in the last election declared, ‘Our best days lie ahead!’ ‘The best is yet to come!’ In short, ‘We have given you a century of mass carnage, slaughtering millions, and with Weapons of Mass Destruction wiped out Dresden, the jewel of European civilisation, in one night of blanket bombing, and two great cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in a blinding flash.’
The remaining claims of democracy has no reality, the claim people rule themselves by themselves is a fallacy. In all Capitalist Democratic societies, people do not rule themselves by themselves, because this is a fanciful idea. In reality, people are ruled by a certain group of influential people, such as the Capitalists in the United States and the aristocrats in England, which are two of the most deeply rooted Capitalist Democratic countries. These influential groups in the Capitalist countries hold the necessary means to bring whoever they want into the government and any laws which are passed and those charged with their implementation would be serving their interests.
