Here I want to discuss the invasions that took place between 1000 AD to 1857 AD, starting from Mahmood ghaznavi. Which empires did sindh remain part of, any resistance offered, and any historical sites from those eras existing in the province?
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
[TABLE=“class: infobox, width: 189”]
Ghaznavid Empire
963–1187
Mamluk dynasty
1206–1290
Khilji dynasty
1290–1320
Tughlaq dynasty
1320–1413
Sayyid dynasty
1414–1451
Lodhi dynasty
1451–1526
Mughal Empire
1526–1858
Durrani Empire
1747–1823
Maratha Empire
1758–1760
Sikh Confederacy
1733–1805
Sikh Empire
1799–1849
British Indian Empire
1849–1947
Dominion of Pakistan
1947–1956
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
You are at right place Ali 
Sindh remained under influence / control of various dynasties in different periods. Local rulers sometimes remained under full control of those empires (mainly from Delhi) and sometimes they acted independently.
Local dynasties include Soomra, Sama, Kal’hoRas and Talpurs. Besides them governors appointed by Delhi empire mainly from Afghan origin (like Arghoon, Tarkhan, etc) also played important role in Sindh’s history
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
Any further information about the dynasties of soomras, sama, kalhorRas and talpurs.
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
what kind of information you are specifically looking for Ali?
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
Soomra dynasty - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Soomro dynasty ruled Sindh from 1024 AD to 1351 AD under the patronage of Abbasids. At the same time Samma dynasty was ruling Kutch.
Did Mehmood Ghaznavi and company represent the Abbasids in the subcontinent?
KalhoRas ruled between 1701 and 1783, and Talpurs between 1783 and 1843.
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
I don’t think that Mehmood Ghaznavi represented Abbasid Caliphate. He was independent in taking all his decisions including his raid on Somnath. I think Arabs were tolerant for religious matters of invaded areas compared to these Afghans and Central Asian invaders 
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
^ Does that mean that between 1000 to 1351 AD, Sindh had nothing to do with the Afghan ruler in Northern India?
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
^ Does that mean that between 1000 to 1351 AD, Sindh had nothing to do with the Afghan ruler in Northern India?
I think Mehmood Ghaznavi's raids were limited to Punjab and Gujraat, whereas, Soomras were ruling Sindh independently and under patronage of either Abbasid or Qaramti of Egypt.
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
Ok and what happened during the period between 1351 and 1701?
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
Ok and what happened during the period between 1351 and 1701?
I think it remained under independent rulers till 1592, when it was conquered by Mughals during Akbar's period. Shahjahan remained governor of Sindh during Jehangir's era, when he built beautiful mosque in Thatta.
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
Ok and what other historical moghul buildings are there in sindh (excluding thatta mosque)?
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
These are the maps of Khilji Dynasty, Tughlaq dynasty, and Sindh seems to be part of it. I am not sure about Sayyid dynasty.
File:Khilji dynasty 1290 - 1320 ad.PNG - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Restored attachments:
Re: Muslim invasions in Sindh
It seems after the Soomro empire, Sindh remained part of Delhi Sultanate (at least during Tughlaq and Khiljis). During Ibrahim Lodhis period the government was confined to Punjab only.