Re: Muslim Blood - Cheap Commodity by Yvonne Ridley
Honestly, it was the Muslims who also do all things the Americans have done. Moreover, America did many good things as well, especially in regards to keeping Russia's Communism from Western Europe or saving the Muslims from the Serbs in mid 1990s.
Communism was an over-hyped threat. In fact, it may well have been a major Pakistani blunder to not side with the Soviets, as the Russian relationship with India shows that they were much more loyal an ally than the Americans ever were willing to be.
As for saving Muslims from the Serbs...that was more at the behest of NATO, who couldn't tolerate a civil war so close to their door steps. Even if it were Gypsies being killed, they would have done the same...so Muslims should feel no more safe because of that action, as it has been made apparent that at least one NATO member is rather keen on fabricating pretexts for war.
Even then, that was only in Kosovo.. They did squat all for Bosnia, which in fact saw many of the reviled Mujahadeen fighting the good fight alongside Bosnians...while Nato sat by and let massacres go on, quite literally on their watch.
I should also point out that real politick retorts, although welcome and refreshing, in no way shape or form dislodges an ideological position. If anything, the fact that Americans follow their own interests enhance Crescent's position...whether Americans want to destabilize the Muslim world or not....they are doing just that.
So, by virtue of this fact, any ideology that is Chauvinistic (in the proper sense of the word), ferociously (if not militantly) independent-minded, broad and sincere in it's message of unity, and almost entirely self-interested is, dare I say, the right kind of ideology. And no, the ilk of HT, or the Taliban simply don't fit the bill...but they do get bits of the equation...
As for the Gulf Arabs profiteering from American misadventures in the region...why do you think pro-American puppets are not as hated?