Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

**ISSUE OF SINGING AND MUSIC IN ISLAM
**

Music is something unique to every culture and group of people. It defines their experiences and can provide a powerful means of bring people to Islam as seen through the works of Yusuf Islam, Dawood Warnsby Ali, MYNA tapes, Sons of the Crescent and others (all have used musical instruments and sounds in one way or the other). Allah says: “Say: who has prohibited Allah’s beautiful things which He created for His servants and good provisions?” Music can be a powerful tool if used correctly. There is no doubt that music and songs about haram activities is not allowed in Islam. But before we make a judgment on singing and instruments for Islamic purposes one must look at the arguments for and against the use of Instruments.
**Argument #1: **
The only scholar that ever said music was permissible is Sheikh Yusuf Qardawi:
Response
There were many scholars in the past that said that music was permissible:
Shawkawni, Ibn Hazm, Ghazalli, Abú Bakr al-'Arabi, Qaradawi, and others.
Argument #2:
*Volume 7, Book 69, Number 494v: *
*Narrated Abu 'Amir or Abu Malik Al-Ash’ari that he heard the Prophet saying, "**From among my followers there will be some people who will consider illegal sexual intercourse, the wearing of silk, the drinking of alcoholic drinks and the use of musical instruments, as lawful. *And there will be some people who will stay near the side of a mountain and in the evening their shepherd will come to them with their sheep and ask them for something, but they will say to him, ‘Return to us tomorrow.’ Allah will destroy them during the night and will let the mountain fall on them, and He will transform the rest of them into monkeys and pigs and they will remain so till the Day of Resurrection."
Response
There is a general rule in Shariah that states that everything is lawful unless proven unlawful. There is not substantial proof in this hadîths because of the following reasons:
Sheikh Muhammad Al-Hanuti stated: “The Hadith referred to in saying that it is haram as narrated by al Bukhari is not fulfilling the requirements of the Sahih in al Bukhari’s collection. 1) Al Bukhari in Hadith al Ma’azif himself narrated the Hadith to be of a broken chain of narrators in which there is a gap between al Bukhari and the second narrator, so he drops the first narrator in his chain. That is called Mu’allaq. Some scholars tried to connect the chain through other means like whan ibn Hajar did in his dissertation (connecting what is disconnected) in which he connected the Isnad of this Hadith. But still, one of the main narrators whose name is Hisham ibn Ammar as profiled in Tahthib at-Tahthib by ibn Hajar is not reliable enough for some scholars to be a source of a narration that depends on somebody like him. 2) Even when we said the Hadith is Sahih, there are questions that would emerge when we study the version of the Hadith when it says, “People will make adultery, pure silk, liquor and Ma’azif into Halal.” We know that adultery is Haram by another proof and it is a unanimous Hukum. Pure silk is not of consensus Hukum. If a Muslim says Zina is Halal deliberately, then they are considered a kafir. However, if a Muslim says pure silk is not Haram, he is not a kafir. We know that liquor is Haram as it is in the Qur’an, but where do we find an authentic hadith or Qur’an to tell us that Ma’azif are Haram other than this source. The last point is to get the clear meaning of Ma’azif in arabic dictionaries because there are more than one meaning for Ma’azif. It is acceptable for a Muslim to hear somebody says Makruh but not Haram because Haram is in need of clear-cut meaning and certain narration.”
Argument #3: Some Muslims state the following about this hadith:
“The Prophet compared musical instruments to things that are definitely known to be haraam, namely zina and alcohol. If instruments were not haraam, he would not have made this comparison. The evidence of this hadeeth that singing is haram is definitive. Even if no other hadeeth or aayah spoke about musical instruments, this hadeeth would be sufficient to prove that they are haraam, especially the kind of singing and music that is known among people nowadays, the essence of which is obscenity and foul talk, based on all kinds of musical instruments such as guitars, drums, flutes, ouds, zithers, organs, pianos, violins and other things that make it more enticing, such as the voices of these effeminate singers and whores.” (Article found on the internet).
Response to this argument:
However, these same people state that singing and the use of daff during weddings is ok because of the following hadîth in Bukhari
Volume 7, Book 69, Number 494v:
*The Two Festivals (Eids) - Narrated Aisha: Abu Bakr came to my house while two small Ansari girls were singing beside me the stories of the Ansar concerning the Day of Buath. And they were not singers. Abu Bakr said protestingly, “Musical instruments of Satan in the house of Allah’s Apostle !” It happened on the 'Id day and Allah’s Apostle said, “O Abu Bakr! There is an 'Id for every nation and this is our 'Id.” *
There is no forbidden action that is permitted merely for pleasure and enjoyment only at certain times. The hadîth that is quoted above mentions things that are definitely known to be haraam, namely zina and alcohol. Even silk which the Prophet wore himself for a short period before violently taking it off (see hadîths Volume 1, Book 8, Number 372) the prophet did not allow it on the Eids:
*Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 289: Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad) - http://islam.org/audio/ra190/Narrated Ibn 'Umar - 'Umar saw a silken cloak being sold in the market and he brought it toAllah’s Apostle and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Buy this cloak and adorn yourself with it on the 'Id festivals and on meeting the delegations.” Allah’s Apostle replied, “This is the dress for the one who will have no share in the Hereafter (or, this is worn by one who will have no share in the Hereafter).” *
From this argument we should understand the hadîth meaning that being involved in wearing silk, fornication, wine drinking and musical instruments is haram. We can see that there are many Muslims today who are involved in all four of these aspects at once.
Imam Ghazali said in *Ihya Ulum Al-Din–The Revival Of The Religious Sciences: “*The musical instruments and songs which are typically associated with drunkards are prohibited as they remind of prohibited things and promote the prohibited, such as the consumption of wine and other intoxicants. These prohibited instruments include the Majamir, the Autar and the Kubah, but not the Daf, the flute and other musical instruments.”
Argument #4:
All of the schools of thought including Maliki, Shafii, Hanbali and Hanafi say that music is Haram
Response:
Sheikh Muhammad Al-Hanuti stated:
“The majority of schools say music is haram, but there are some other reliable schools that say it is halal.”
We must look at the evidence provided by all scholars and then take into consideration what the music is being used for. In this age, the music industry is powerful and it leads astray many youth who are addicted to this music. As Muslims we must provide Islamic alternatives for them in order to guide them back to Islam.
Argument #5:
All other Ahadeeh recorded refer to musical instruments negatively.
Response:
In Bukhari, another hadith relates a connection between musical instruments and the family of David (saw). This is evidence that, indeed, the Psalms were musical in nature:

*Bukhari Volume 6, Book 61, Number 568: *
"Narrated Abu Musa that the Prophet said to him’ “O Abu Musa! You have been given one of the musical wind-instruments of the family of David.'”
The following hadith relates of how the adhan (call to prayer) came to be, and how the Prophet’s companions suggested the use of musical instruments such as the horn or bell like the People of the Book. Now although the Prophet ultimately approved the use of the human voice, there is no mention that the Prophet chastised his companions for suggesting musical instruments for the adhan. And if the Prophet was so very much against musical instruments, then why would his companions dare to suggest the use of such sinful things in the call to prayer?

From Muslim Book 004, Number 0735:
Ibn Umar reported: When the Muslims came to Medina, they gathered and sought to know the time of prayer but no one summoned them. One day they discussed the matter, and some of them said: Use something like the bell of the Christians and some of them said: Use horn like that of the Jews. Umar said: Why may not a be appointed who should call (people) to prayer? The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: O Bilal, get up and summon (the people) to prayer.
Conclusion:
As Muslims we must understand the environment that our youth live in. Our duty is to bring Islam to them and instil the love of Allah in their hearts. We must combat the negative forces in the society with positive alternatives rather than harsh rules that are not agreed upon by all scholars. Music and singing has been used successfully for over a decade in this country as a means to bring the youth to have stronger faith in their religion. We should encourage this development to the best of our abilities.

:salam2:

**Narrated Ar Rabi (the daughter of Muawwidh bin Afra): **
After the consummation of my marriage, the Prophet came and sat on my bed as far from me as you are sitting now, and our little girls started beating the tambourines (daff) and reciting elegiac verses mourning my father, who had been killed in the battle of Badr. One of them said, among us is a Prophet who knows what will happen tomorrow. On that the Prophet said, Leave this (saying) and keep on saying the verses which you had been saying before. [Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol.7 Hadith No.5147]

Therefore from the above evidence it is concluded that the use of musical instruments in general is forbidden in Islam, with the exception of the ‘Daff’.

Music usually intoxicates a person and takes one away from the path of Allah (swt). Music engages a persons mind and takes him/her away from the remembrance of his/her Creator and from realizing and focusing his/her attention on the purpose of his/her creation. In musical songs, most of the times the listeners even appreciate illogical, incorrect and blasphemous matter and content. A person will realize this when he starts pondering over the meaning of many Hindi and English songs, lyrics and ghazals. Here we find that it is because of music that the persons mind is intoxicated and the person deviates from the straight path. And Allah Knows the Best.

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

Two things that can't coexist in the same place: Music and remembrance (zikr) of Allah (s.w.t)

When I am ironing my clothes, polishing my shoes, working out in the Gym, or driving....etc. either I am singing or listening to any song to keep myself excited or my tongue is experiencing the sweetness of Darood sharif, kalma....etc. which warms my heart with feelings of purity.

BUT which one should I prefer to keep myself motivated ? Allah mentions this quality of a "Mo'min" in the Quran that their tongues are always fresh with the "Zikr" recitations of Allah either they are siting, standing or lying on soft beds.

BUT what benefit or harm do I get when I continue to do any of these activities in my life ?

One quality of zikr is that it removes the hurdles (troubles) from my way which are waiting for me (written in my fate) in the near future, but the greater benefit is that it makes zikr my strong habit.

What is the benefit of a strong habit ? Well, when one is totally confused and fearful one unintentionally performs one's strong habit as the mind is not working properly. like after knowing that there is an earthquake, due to intense fear I might unintentionally run towards the room which I visit most often. SO ?

So, when I see the angel of death at the time of death I would be so scared and fearful that unintentionally I would be following my biggest habit.

Either I would be able to achieve what is mentioned in the hadith " the person who is able to recite Kalma-e-Tayyab at the time of death would directly go to Jannah"

OTHERWISE, there are a lot of other cases. A person singing his favorite song, another counting money, another business talking,...etc. while people around them failed to understand why at the last moments the person is not reciting

"LA ILAHA ILLALLAHU MOHAMMADUR RASUL ALLAH"

May Allah bless us with the strength and wisdom to decide now, what we want to make our best habit before it is too late....

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

:jazak:

beautifully said... Jazakallah

Hey, thanks for your post. Especially the bold part. I read exactly the same somewhere else sometime back.

Beautiful!

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

if the mehboob is ALLAH, then even a romantic song will remind an Ashiq of ALLAH only. Ashiqs need an excuse and reason to remember the Mehboob.

^ Most songs won’t remind you of Allah (Swt) because the one in which they mention it , is through disrespectful ways, at times doing Shirk. Please check the following:

http://www.paklinks.com/gs/all-views/293891-why-bollywood-songs-are-not-good-for-muslims.html

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

^

I didnt mention "most" songs, I mentioned Romantic songs.

Secondly, its abt "Neeat" which matters

There is a song," I FEEL YOU" by Schiller.

A few lines are really good, e.g. I FEEL YOU....IN EVERYTHING.

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

Brother, with no offence, your point reminds me of one of my friends. He used to very seriously tell us.

I and my father together watch that programs on TV in which they show beautiful girls (without much clothes) on beaches, but our niyyaah (intentions) are crystal clear. (I seriously doubt that he is considering them his sisters and his father thinking of them to be his daughters)

Jokes aside. Anything that is not encouraged by the Prophet (Saw), how can it become a source of any good? (in this case music can't help in remembrance of Allah). Music was there in the time of the Prophet (saw). Do we have any source that he enjoyed or encouraged listening to it (May Allah (swt) forgive me for saying that).

No, i dont have any source for that.

and taking it to the extreme of watching semi- naked girls and relating it to my post of remembering ALLAH, well what should i say.

Most people dont understand spirituality and its depth especially when its abt ishq.
Anyways, u stick to ur faith and i am satisfied with mine.

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

I apologise if you didn't like the example. The purpose was not to mock you but to clarify that it is not possible to extract anything good from something whose origin is bad (discouraged by the Prophet (saw).

Any ways, I have no right to judge your intentions. If you feel satisfied that you can give the same reasoning to Allah (Swt) and the Prophet (Saw) on the day of judgement, then who am I to intervene. May Allah (Swt) reward you for your good intentions.

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

In Romantic Songs.. verbs are used which define beauty, form or shape, character ..and to ascribe these to Allah SWT are not Jaiz .. because Allah has no form, shape or His beauty cant be measured or judged ..

Therefore, nothing of this world no matter how beautiful , amazing, magnificent, great, it is it will never equate to the status of Allah Almighty. because He is Far beyond that and of our imaginations ..as even Musa AS could not bear to visualize the ‘tajalli’ of Allah Alimighty at Mount sinai ..

So, when a Person listens to a Song first of all many instruments are not jaiz in islam except Duff - and how many songs does one knw that arent without music .. ?? next to none i think .. then to listen to a song whose purpose and objective is to describe the beauty of a creation - in romantic song a woman .. and to ascribe this beauty to a ‘Being’ which is NOT a creation ..i.e. Allah ..its beyond my comprehension as to what that persons intention is :konfused: and secondly .. songs which are for describing a beauty of a creattion .. naturally ..the human mind is set to default .. that when a womans beauty is being described or praised .. the human mind will automatically divert to a visual of a woman or if that person has seen the video of that ssong ..it will playback in his/her mind…and If after this someone still says that it reminds one Of Allah Almighty .. then i believe he/she is committing a sin because the beauty, status, or praise of Allah Almighty is beyond our comprehension.

Spirituality: What is the definition of Spirituality. Spirituality is something which is associated with the Praise of Allah Almighty and the the Praise of Holy messenger SAW. So if one assumes that spirituality is gained through a song ..then the only answer i can give for this is ..that … that person has a LONG way to go yet before one even touches the base of spirituality.

May Allah forgive me if i said anything which My Messenger SAW and Allah is not pleased (Aameen)

…but once spirituality is gained, then everything is jaiz!!! It’s just about you and your mehboob then!!! No holds barred in that love… everything forgiven… and listen to whatever “music” you want too!! :slight_smile:
…and just for the record, I am not talking about Islam in general… I am strictly referring to the spiritual side… but you will only understand this if you have MORE than just basic knowledge of roohaniyat!!!

I remember an incident i read about a prophet(R.A) of earlier times, i think either it was Hazrat Musa (R.A) or Hazrat ISSA (R.A).

He (R.A) was walking on his way to meet with ALLAH at a designated spot. On his way, he saw a shepherd with sheep, saying, ALLAH i wish you could come to me, so i put oil in your hair, so i comb your hair, so i put new clothes on you etc etc.

The Hazrat (R.A) got very angry and stopped him and said, you dont know what ALLAH looks like and you are saying such things. The shepherd got hurt and stopped.

The Hazrat (R.A) moved on and had a meeting with ALLAH and in the end ALLAH said to that Hazrat (R.A), you shouldnt have stopped that shepherd for loving me the way he does, for I like the way he loves me.

The Hazrat (R.A) on his way back, apologized to the shepherd and asked him to carry on the way he loved ALLAH.

Now, considering your reply to the post, you have no idea what spirituality is. otherwise you swouldnt have said about forms or shapes at all.

An ashiq doesnt hear WORDS of the songs to express his love, its the THEME of song which drives him crazy, which is “love” or better known as “ishq”.

Secondly, you are again wrong about the instruments from spirituality point of view, an ashiq wants to think of his ishq always.The basic point of instruments being illegal is because they can drive a person to a crazy (junooni) state and he makes vulgar moves on such tunes also.

But here,its all different in spirituality, the ashiq just wants to meet his mehboob. He doesnt care about anything else, the negativities of instruments are nulllified straigthaway because neither they take him to the devil, nor his accomplices but to his mehboob.

In spirituality, mind has no value, its the heart that matters, coz ishq can stay in heart, not in mind.
A devil can change ur thoughts the mind, not through the heart. and ishq (ALLAH) resides in hearts of HIS lovers.

You are taking spirituality from philosophy point of view where as spirituality has nothing to do with sciences or philosophy, it has to do with soul(rooh) of a person and so is thus called Roohaniat.

As for gaining spirituality through music, yes that happens in some silsilas through qawwalis, because in qawwlis when a person goes in “wajd” state, he is at extreme point of ishq and his soul(rooh) controls his body at that time.

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

Nicely said Sarge.... I have heard that story before from my dad..... thank you for sharing!!!

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

I wish more people would understand that music is not allowed, but nobody in my family seems bothered and they are really religious in most other aspect of their lives. I have yet to meet someone who agrees with my view of music.

Re: Music: Permissable Or Not: Part 1

Question: What kind of music would be permissible? Most of the music, if all, now-a-days in associated with sexuality, nudity; is sung by people who know nothing about religion, is composed by people far from worship; is from poets trying to make a livelihood........so in all my question is whether music from these kind of people and with such kind of associations be permissible, if at all permissible?

Qawali and other such "spiritual" kinds of music (which tariqat and silsila people claim that helps in gaining some spirituality) is a controversial topic, a relatively smaller number of learned ulema say its ok, majority of ulema say its a no no. Simple answer is that: when we know that its a disputed matter, and majority is inclined towards its being not allowed, plus this "spiritual" (if any) sort of music is a very very very small portion of the actual music available (and even the promoters/writers/singers/players of this portion have nothing to do with religion in the most cases), one can easily decide that its better to avoid it entirely instead of trying to justify their love for music...

easy to understand, but difficult to accept : )

Question:
Is music haraam? Some people are propagating the view that it is not Haraam. Many Islamic songs are sung with the playing of the duff.

Is it permissible to listen to them’ Also, some Islamic songs are recorded with the zikr of “Allah” played in the background. It sounds very much like drums are being played. However, it is a group of people who are saying “Allah” in unison.

Is there any problem in listening to this?

Answer:
Hazrath Anas (R.A.) reports that Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) said: ‘There will certainly be people from my Ummah who will attempt to legalize fornication, the wearing of silk (for males), the consuming of wine and the use of musical instruments’ (Al-Jaamius Sagheer - Pg. 139). Indeed this prophesy of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) is glaring before us. Despite the clear prohibition of the use of musical instruments, great efforts are being made to ‘legalize’ their use. While some people wish to declare all music permissible, others are opening the door slowly by declaring that only the use of the ‘duff’ is permissible. Thus it is necessary to examine the reality of these claims in the light of the Qur’an and Sunnah. In Surah Luqman Allah Ta’ala declares: ‘And among the people are those who purchase idle talk in order to mislead others from the path of Allah in ignorance.’ Hazrath Abdullah bin Masood (R.A.) states emphatically that this verse was revealed regarding singing and musical instruments.

The same has been reported from Hazrath Abdullah bin Abbas (R.A.) and Hazrath Jaabir (R.A.) (Tafseer Qurtubi). Thus when these illustrious students of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam), who witnessed the revelation of the aayaat (verses) of the Qur’an are clear that this verse prohibits music and musical instruments, the ‘view’ of any twentieth century ‘scholar’ to the contrary holds no weight. BLOCK OUT SOUND Various Ahadith also clearly prohibit music and the use of musical instruments. Hazrath Abdullah bin Umar (R.A.) reports that once Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) heard the sound of the flute of a shepherd. He immediately placed his fingers into his ears (to block out the sound) (Musnad Ahmad). How tragic it is that our beloved Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) blocks his ears to the sound of music but his Ummah opens their ears wide to the same sounds. In another narration Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) is reported to have said: ‘ Verily Allah Ta’ala has sent me as a guidance and as a mercy to the Believers and He has commanded me to destroy musical instruments’ (Musnad Ahmad).

DUFF As for the duff, it is also a musical instrument and therefore it will primarily be included in the above prohibition. However, some concession was given for the use of the duff on the occasion of a Nikah. The Sahaaba (R.A.), who were the direct students of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) understood the commands of the Qur’an and Hadith far better than we can ever hope to understand. It is reported regarding Hazrath Umar (R.A.) that if he heard the sound of a duff he would immediately send somebody to investigate. If it was found to be the occasion of a Walima, he would not do anything. Otherwise he would go for his whip (i.e. he would forcefully stop the playing of the duff) (Fathul Qadeer - Vol. 6, Pg. 389). EXTRACTING LAWS Nevertheless, to extract the laws of Shariah directly from the Qur’an and Sunnah is possible only for one who is a mujtahid [in the calibre of the four great Imaams viz. Imaam Abu Hanifa (R.A.), Imaam Malik (R.A.), Imaam Shaafi (R.A.) and Imaam Ahmad bin Hambal (R.A.)].

Together with an expert in-depth knowledge of the Qur’an and hundreds of thousands of Ahadith, they had also mastered all the numerous sciences pertaining to the Qur’an and Sunnah. According to the Zaahirur Riwayah (the most authentic narrations) of the Hanafi school of thought, the use of the duff is completely disallowed. Latter day scholars who have attributed a restricted permissibility to the Hanafi school have erred. This complete disallowal is based on the Juristic principle of ‘saddan lil baab’ i.e. to restrict an act that would invariably lead to impermissible actions.

The Shafi’ee Ulama have permitted the use of the duff only on the occasion of a walima subject to several conditions. Allamah Ibn Hajar Makki, Shafi’ee has detailed the various conditions, among which is that the duff should not be beaten in a manner that produces a musical sound, but rather just a simple beating which does not produce any tune or melody. Only the palms may be used to beat the duff and not the fingers.

It should also be beaten only for a short while. Having stated this he says that ‘in our era it is makrooh to beat the duff’ (since people cannot fulfil the stringent conditions). Therefore in the light of the above one should not listen to such nazams which are accompanied by the playing of the duff. BACKGROUND ZIKR As for the ‘background zikr,’ this should be considered very carefully.

What is the purpose of having people say “Allah” in unison in the background’ Is it for the purpose of zikr itself’ If yes, then why in the background’ If the purpose is to create a background effect to make the nazam more entertaining, in the manner that background music is used, this is an extremely dangerous thing. It is abuse of the name of Allah Ta’ala.

The name of Allah Ta’ala is not for the purpose of entertainment. If it has been deliberately made to resemble the beating of drums, it will be even more serious and even dangerous for one’s Imaan. One should totally refrain from listening to such nazams. Al-haadi vol.10

Ref: http://www.askimam.org