Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
What! Are the BBC and New York Times saying that the people of Pakistan have to wait another 6 to 9 months before the alleged weak dictator without his wardi is no longer the Pakistani President. The elctorate will not be happy.
Aaalsi bhaijaan. Yes teh weak dictator without is wardi is probably at least 6-9 months from facing treason charges and execution... reason being that the Americans are still supporting him and they are power #1
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
TheRealDeal bhaijan. I am very disappointed that the Pakistani electorate have to wait for the leader of Great USA to leave, in order to see the illegal dictator of Pakistan, without the power of his wardi leave.
jhoot bolay kawwa katay, "kalay" kawway se daryo
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
^ Are you referring to Arbab 'Chappa Chapp Chappal Challey'? If he 'kaats' we should get the victim a anti-rabies shot.
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
It comes from BBC and NewYork Times, not me
nope, it doesnt. :)
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Pakistanis are known to let the devil back in. Baldilocks Nawaz and the Bhuttos screwed the country over so many times...then the Pakistanis burn effigies of these leaders...get rid of them...do their baistee and then pray for their coming back...lol lol lol! you guys are too much. Now the powers to be have 'cleared' Zardari of his crimes and he is the next guy that the Paks are going to put on a pedastal..and then he will rob you again. There is a saying which does not apply to Pakistanis because you're just too thick: "you get burnt once not twice!" I say now that the two stooges are back in Nawaz & Zardari.....well; let the show begin!
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Pakistanis are known to let the devil back in. Baldilocks Nawaz and the Bhuttos screwed the country over so many times...then the Pakistanis burn effigies of these leaders...get rid of them...do their baistee and then pray for their coming back...lol lol lol! you guys are too much. Now the powers to be have 'cleared' Zardari of his crimes and he is the next guy that the Paks are going to put on a pedastal..and then he will rob you again. There is a saying which does not apply to Pakistanis because you're just too thick: "you get burnt once not twice!" I say now that the two stooges are back in Nawaz & Zardari.....well; let the show begin!
You are forgetting a few things since you seem to be thinking 1999, when Mushy was all goody goody.
NS/BB governed pakistan for a total of 11 years, in 4 chunks.
Musharraf clung on to power, and has ruled for almost 10 years alone, uninterrupted (desperately wants 5 more). What is so special hes achieved apart from civil war, food crisis, inflation, terrorism, loss of sovereignty, attacks on freedom of media, abduction and lack of security of civilians, tarnishing of the image of the forces, political murders, and crackdown on judiciary? Pleases dont give me any jingles on economy, because we all know how bad it is right now. Also, mind telling me who let Zardari back in?
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Pakistanis are known to let the devil back in. Baldilocks Nawaz and the Bhuttos screwed the country over so many times...then the Pakistanis burn effigies of these leaders...get rid of them...do their baistee and then pray for their coming back...lol lol lol! you guys are too much. Now the powers to be have 'cleared' Zardari of his crimes and he is the next guy that the Paks are going to put on a pedastal..and then he will rob you again. There is a saying which does not apply to Pakistanis because you're just too thick: "you get burnt once not twice!" I say now that the two stooges are back in Nawaz & Zardari.....well; let the show begin!
I'll be very interested to know who let these crooked/corrupt politicians in when "someone" had all the chances to keep them out forever and prosecute them for their crimes, thanks.
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Pakistanis are known to let the devil back in. Baldilocks Nawaz and the Bhuttos screwed the country over so many times...then the Pakistanis burn effigies of these leaders...get rid of them...do their baistee and then pray for their coming back...lol lol lol! you guys are too much. Now the powers to be have 'cleared' Zardari of his crimes and he is the next guy that the Paks are going to put on a pedastal..and then he will rob you again. There is a saying which does not apply to Pakistanis because you're just too thick: "you get burnt once not twice!" I say now that the two stooges are back in Nawaz & Zardari.....well; let the show begin!
Well said
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Perhaps, unless Nawaz can grab power before then.
As mentioned,Mush is barely hanging on to his kursi, only because of his master Bush.
Once Bush goes, his agent Mush will not have the same backing
Bush didn't bring President Pervez Musharraf to power, Bush wasn't even a president himself then.
It was a bloodless coup d'etat on October 12, 1999 that saw zero resistance from the Pakistani society.
I wish you were born back then so you could see just how desparate the Pakistani people were for a military intervention in 1990s
Musharaf is the best thing that has happened to Pakistan!!!!
i will always pray for his well being wherever he goes
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Spock: 'civil war, food crisis, inflation, terrorism, loss of sovereignty, attacks on freedom of media, abduction and lack of security of civilians, tarnishing of the image of the forces, political murders, and crackdown on judiciary?' Did BB and NS do any worse! Come on wakeup Mr and smell the coffee!!! You guys are too much! Suppliers are hording food and selling it to neigbouring countries, govmnt to crack down on them now, inflation is very good for a 3rd world country, 'crackdown on judiciary' do you call that a judiciary who only serves itself, they needed to be taken in hand.. the corrupt B***tards! Political murders like Zardari did...LOL!!! come on get real!
Spock: 'civil war, food crisis, inflation, terrorism, loss of sovereignty, attacks on freedom of media, abduction and lack of security of civilians, tarnishing of the image of the forces, political murders, and crackdown on judiciary?' Did BB and NS do any worse! Come on wakeup Mr and smell the coffee!!! You guys are too much! Suppliers are hording food and selling it to neigbouring countries, govmnt to crack down on them now, inflation is very good for a 3rd world country, 'crackdown on judiciary' do you call that a judiciary who only serves itself, they needed to be taken in hand.. the corrupt B***tards! Political murders like Zardari did...LOL!!! come on get real!
You need to wake up and smell the coffee bro as this aint 1999, apart from economic catastrophes, there was nothing else wrong back in those times, but right now its a whole new ball game. Inflation good for a 3rd world country, go tell this to the people who are lined up and cant even find any atta. Yeah, judiciary is corrupt so just kick the judges out and install your puppets only because they start providing justice to the people, brilliant logic.
Spock: 'civil war, food crisis, inflation, terrorism, loss of sovereignty, attacks on freedom of media, abduction and lack of security of civilians, tarnishing of the image of the forces, political murders, and crackdown on judiciary?' Did BB and NS do any worse! Come on wakeup Mr and smell the coffee!!! You guys are too much! Suppliers are hording food and selling it to neigbouring countries, **govmnt to crack down on them now, inflation is very good for a 3rd world country, 'crackdown on judiciary' do you call that a judiciary who only serves itself, they needed to be taken in hand.. the corrupt B*tards! Political murders like Zardari did...LOL!!! come on get real!
when exactly did "aata crisis start"? was it during "civilian" rule or "Mushy" rule?
when exactly did "aata crisis start"? was it during "civilian" rule or "Mushy" rule?
When did global inflation and regional atta crisis start?
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Even the crooked Chaudhries have blamed Musharraf’s lawnmower Shortcut Aziz for the economic crisis and food shortage, need I say more 
Crooked chaudries are blaming someone else, but you believe them 100% because they now subscribe to your viewpoint. What stopped you from listening to them before when Mush hadn’t thrown them out?
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
Munna, the chaudhries had blamed Shortcut Aziz long before Busharraf pulled a u-turn on them.
Re: Musharraf To Quit in 6-9 Months (New York Times)
There is fighting already??? Great Zardari is/was having making so many dosts of Great altaf, great takloo, great fazlu, great sammy etc... :)
When did global inflation and regional atta crisis start?
Egjactly, a la "electricity crisis" these crisis didn't "start/occur" AFTER new govt, whatever the reasons (separate discussions).