Musharraf- The NDTV Interview

I wasnt able to watch it, but I hear it was quite interesting. The interviewer asked some tough and pinching questions, and Mush as usual gave brilliant answers reflecting his personality.

This summary from Dawn today had some interesting bits;

http://dawn.com/2006/12/09/top4.htm
**
President Gen Pervez Musharraf has defended the killing of Nawab Akbar Bugti, saying there was no way to deal politically with the problem since the Baloch rebel leader had been heading a 6,000-strong militia of heavily armed men.**

In an interview to India’s NDTV recently, Gen Musharraf described Mr Bugti as an anti-national and himself as a patriot who loved his country. NDTV showed on Friday what it said was the entire interview it recently had with Gen Musharraf.

** In any case, the death of five army officers in the incident indicated they did not plan to kill him but were probably seeking his surrender when a blast occurred in the cave where Mr Bugti had sought shelter, he said.

One of the points that came out from Friday’s accounts is that Gen Musharraf sleeps well and is not obsessively worried for his life. “What is the worst that can happen to me? I always believe in analysing the worst. And can I face it. Yes, I can face it,” the president said.

Asked what is the `worst’ that could happen to him, he said: "Why talk about the worst? I can face everything. So I am not at all (afraid). I don’t think of it.

“Let me honestly say, sometimes I do (worry). But not at all the way you are thinking that I am worried. When I put my head on the pillow… off… I sleep. I am a very comfortable sleeper. I know that. Since the people are with me and the people like me and I know that, what can happen to me? I can face anything.”**

** What about his family? Aren’t they worried, he was asked. “Yes,” he replied.** **“Some in the family.”

**

Re: Musharraf- The NDTV Interview

And since he had hinted in the interview that he may not give up the wardi in 2007, PMLQ declared they’d back his decision

http://dawn.com/2006/12/09/top6.htm
The Pakistan Muslim League (PML) will support President General Pervez Musharraf if he decides against discarding military uniform beyond 2007 “in the interest of national integration and sustained democracy”.

“We will support his re-election in uniform after his current term expires in 2007,” PML president Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain told Dawn on Friday, when asked to comment on President Musharraf’s remarks aired by India’s NDTV.

Chaudhry Shujaat said the president had become the symbol of unity and the country needed him both as president and army chief.

He said that General Musharraf understood his constitutional obligations very well.

“Since he has so far acted in accordance with the Constitution, we in the PML fully support him in both the capacities,” he said.

To a question, he said that all leaders of his party believed in the leadership of President Musharraf and no one had any objection to his continuing in military uniform in future as well.

Re: Musharraf- The NDTV Interview

Musharraf is a great soldier and patriot. :k:

Re: Musharraf- The NDTV Interview

Musharraf’s bold brinkmanship

THERE is a storm in a tea cup brewing over some half truths circulating as an abrupt change in Pakistan’s Kashmir policy. In his December 5 interview to Indian television NDTV, President Pervez Musharraf merely reiterated his earlier position on how he believed forward movement on Kashmir was possible. Some of those positions the former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had also supported. Yet political point-scoring, a lack of historical sense and sensational reporting, all combine to promote an uninformed and frenzied discourse on Kashmir. This is perhaps obvious in how the Indian opposition party BJP, which actually initiated the peace process and the idea of ‘give and take’ on Kashmir is publicly resisting any initiative the Congress takes on Kashmir. In his December 5 interview, President Pervez Musharraf again conveyed Pakistan’s willingness to take bold steps to resolve the half century old issue. Advocating the need for flexibility in traditional positions on Kashmir, Musharraf was clear that if Delhi showed flexibility, so would Pakistan. To illustrate the point he said that were Delhi to move forward on conceding Kashmiri political rights, Islamabad too would give up its claim to Kashmir. Musharraf has proactively sought to break the logjam on the lingering conflict. He has practically pushed forward the Lahore process which too zeroed in on seeking a fast-paced solution to the Kashmir issue. He began with the 2001 Agra summit, where he first introduced the notion of a four-step-formula, which included knocking out solutions unacceptable to Pakistan and India and to opt for only solutions acceptable to the Pakistanis, the Indians and the Kashmiris. Subsequently, in his November 18, 2003 interview with Reuters, Musharraf first publicly conveyed the government’s readiness to go beyond “stated positions”. He was clear that a resolution would require that “both sides need to talk with each other with flexibility…coming beyond stated positions…coming and meeting half way somewhere.” Finally, in the April 2005 Delhi summit, Musharraf first introduced the four-point-formula seeking a phased withdrawal of troops; local self-governance; free movement of Kashmiris across the LOC and a joint supervision mechanism in Jammu and Kashmir involving India, Pakistan and the Kashmiris. Obviously, Musharraf was not announcing changes in Pakistan’s Kashmir policy but outlined the extent of flexibility Islamabad was willing to bring in its position. None of this is completely new. Musharraf is attempting to encourage the Indians to move forward. His moves do convey some salient features of a dynamic Kashmir policy.

For example, five key features of Pakistan’s Kashmir policy.

One; Islamabad has demonstrated that while it views the UN resolutions providing the legal locus standi for the Kashmiri case for the right of self-determination, Pakistan will go beyond the UN resolutions that offer the state-integration option requiring the Kashmiris to integrate into Pakistan or India.

Two; the first clear articulation in recent years of Pakistan’s actual position taken at the UN that Pakistan supports the Kashmiri right of self-determination, that is, the right of the Kashmiris to determine their own political future. Pakistan has sought Kashmiri integration with Pakistan.

Three; Islamabad is now proactively facilitating an intra-Kashmiri and Kashmiri-Islamabad dialogue by encouraging unrestricted cross-LOC Kashmiri movement. In a significant departure from its previous policy of ‘favourites’ irrespective of their political orientation Islamabad is now engaging with all Kashmiri groups. This has included the Kashmiri political parties of Indian Held Kashmir (IHK) like the Muslim Conference and the People Democratic Party that have participated in the state elections and have allied with the mainstream Indian political parties.

Four; that while Pakistan and India will determine the broad parameters within which a possible solution could be found, only the collective Kashmiri voice should determine the specifics of such a solution.

Five; that a process approach which addresses the immediate concerns of the Kashmiris while with markers on to resolving Kashmir viable approach must include simultaneous moves a step by step approach towards solving the issue is feasible. Pakistan is proposing a staggered solution. Musharraf said in his interview about his four step proposal that " it is easier said than done. I mean, it’s not as simple as put in across four stages or four aspects of it. **This could be left for trial for five years, 10 years, 15 years; then we can get together again to see its efficacy, if it is functional, well. If there are some modifications required again." **

As Musharraf moves forward with many ideas tabled on Kashmir, political criticisms abound. The combined opposition has moved an adjournment seeking discussion on Musharraf’s statement. The motion questions Musharraf right to offer a settlement formula which has not been discussed in any forum. The motion stated: “President Musharraf has stated, replying to a question at a private Indian Channel NDTV, that he is ready to give up the United Nation resolutions regarding Kashmir which, in his opinion, can be a settlement with India. He (the president) has given a four-point agenda which has not been discussed on any forum even in parliament, which is highest elected institution, and it is a major diversion from the longstanding principled stance of Pakistan on Kashmir.” The motion stated: “It seems that the president has finally let the cat out of the bag and laid bare the intentions behind the stream of vague and confusing ideas expressed by the Pakistani leadership since the peace process began. The intentions of the president have caused grave concern amongst the general public and need discussion on the Floor of the House, adjourning the business of the Senate.” At its December 8 meeting, the PML-N criticised Musharraf for taking a U-turn on the Kashmir issue by withdrawing Pakistan’s just claim on the disputed territory. The party has called on “patriotic forces” to reject Musharraf’s Kashmir proposal. Ironically though, Musharraf’s moves are a logical progression from Nawaz Sharif’s own government. Musharraf is not compromising either the Kashmiri position nor is he unilaterally altering Pakistan’s position on Kashmir. He is merely using the tool-kit available to Pakistan — diplomacy, back channel and CBMs — and a maverick positioning to ‘encourage’ change in the Indian position.

http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/opinion/2006/December/opinion_December57.xml&section=opinion&col=