Musharraf Seeks Seven Years To Transform Pakistan

SOURCE: JANG-GROUP

Says he will give up powers to use Article 58 (2) B when NSC is in place after polls; ‘complexion, culture of country needs massive surgery’

NEW YORK: President Pervez Musharraf mesmerized a crowd of Pakistani elite jam-packed in the grand ballroom of Sheraton Towers with his 80-minute oratory delivered half through his notes and half coming right from his heart.

The crowd was almost the same who had heard Ms Benazir Bhutto and Nawaz Sharif on their holy sojourns to the Land of Fortunes in yesteryears. They always gave a big hand to Pakistani leaders but to Musharraf, flanked by Abdul Sattar Edhi, they gave a standing ovation.

“Give me seven years and I’ll change the complexion and culture of politics in Pakistan”, he pleaded. He told them that 41 percent of the sitting crop of leaders has been disqualified owing to the condition of being graduate. The ladies in the hall greeted him when they learnt 60 seats have been kept for them in the parliament.

“You may be surprised to find a man of uniform talking about politics”, he said with an awareness of his own predicament, “but let me tell you, I firmly believe in democracy”. The crowd responded with a big hand. “I am no usurper of power, I am going to give it over to the elected people and my role would be that of a neutral empire”, he said. “They (politicians) had been dragging generals into politics but that insinuation would stop now as they (generals) would be sitting in the National Security Council having a ratio of 8 elected and 5 in uniform.” He spelled out his belief, “Army must not wield power”, he declared.

Pervez Musharraf lamented the catastrophic national losses, “Who would be responsible for Rs 1300 billion of the nation squandered away by Pakistani politicians in ten years prior to his takeover?” They gave not a single fruitful project to the nation during their decade of misrule, he told Pakistani community.

Quoting an Indian magazine which boasted India to be proud of one achievement, Musharraf lashed out, “India should be ashamed of a thousand other things”.

Giving a resume of his performance in the office, he enumerated the projects in hand – Mirani Dam, Thal Canal, Kichhi Canal, National Highway from Karachi to Kabul, Coastal Highway, M-2, strategic Gawader Port, Lakhra Mines, Lawai Tunnel, Railway standing on its feet, IT thrust, the rising KSE graph, Forex reserves from petty $700 million to an all-time high $ 8 billion, lowering GDP from 53% to 47 %, record high remittance of overseas Pakistanis, controlling fiscal deficit, easing the pile of foreign debts, positive economic indicators by world financial institutions. The announcement of each of his achievement was punctuated with thunderous applause.

All the projects are well on their way to completion, he declared promising a better future of the nation since he won their trust. No delays, no kickbacks and no corruption at any level, he assured.

About the law and order situation, Musharraf had to cut a sorry figure. The fallout of operation in Afghanistan and extremists elements scampering into Pak territories did further messed up law and order situation, he agreed. He hit at foreign agencies fomenting terrorism in Pakistan. About harboring extremists, he said, they were isolated cases. He disclosed that tribal areas were fully under control. He also claimed reining in ISI, the premier intelligence agency and quoted recent arrests of 10 Al-Qaeda men from Karachi by ISI, which indicated clearly that the agency was not siding with extremists. He dispelled the impression that ISI is a state within state.

Musharraf was forthcoming in assuring that the environment for investment in the country is better, the fallout of operation in Afghanistan notwithstanding. To the Pakistani community, he paid his best compliments who, he said, were gems individually but he doubted their ability to be a homogeneous community. He also urged them to be aware of elements fomenting seeds of dissent among them.

APP adds: “I will give up powers to use Article 58 (2) B when NSC is in place after October elections,” the president told the Pakistani Americans.

“We are preventing Martial Law by introducing constitutional reforms and bringing balance between power brokers through a system of checks and balances,” the president said giving a brief background of the recent constitutional reforms. “I am of firm opinion that the army must not govern and must do its own job.”

AFP adds: President General Musharraf said on Friday that he would be forced from power if he ever dropped the stipulation that Kashmir was the core dispute governing relations with India.

While calling on India to return to the negotiating table, Musharraf said that any talks had to accept the “reality” that the bitter territorial dispute over Kashmir was the main issue undermining peace in South Asia. “No leader. No government of Pakistan can ever side-step on the issue of Kashmir … because the people of Pakistan, each individual, is involved,” he said in an address to the Asia Society in New York. “It is not possible. Nobody can do it. He’ll be eliminated. He’ll be out of the government. He’ll be defeated. His government will be defeated,” he said.

Musharraf said it was also time that India dropped its opposition to outside mediation in the Kashmir question. “If bilateralism is not producing results then certainly mediation or third party involvement is the answer,” he said, adding that the United States was better positioned to play a role than Saarc.** “Saarc is an impotent organisation quite frankly,”** he added.

COMMENTS: First 5 was a lucky no. Now, it’s 7 :smiley:

.. the no. 7 will go up as fast as FBI agents in Pakistan.. he will never go since in Constitution of Pakistan punishment of a dictator is Death!

I hope he stays for as long as he needs :k:
Keep the politicians on a leash for as long as he needs to…

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Degas: *
.. the no. 7 will go up as fast as FBI agents in Pakistan.. he will never go since in Constitution of Pakistan punishment of a dictator is Death!
[/QUOTE]

lol. Where does it written in Constitution of Pakistan?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Degas: *
.. the no. 7 will go up as fast as FBI agents in Pakistan.. he will never go since in Constitution of Pakistan punishment of a dictator is Death!
[/QUOTE]

Darling, because of FBI, Pakistanis from oversears bringing money back into Pakistan.

Could you please tell what is the status of politicians, who have looted country?

Have you ever read the Article 62 of the Constitution of Pakistan?

Re: Musharraf Seeks Seven Years To Transform Pakistan

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
SOURCE: JANG-GROUP

Giving a resume of his performance in the office, he enumerated the projects in hand – Mirani Dam, Thal Canal, Kichhi Canal, National Highway from Karachi to Kabul, Coastal Highway, M-2, strategic Gawader Port, Lakhra Mines, Lawai Tunnel, Railway standing on its feet, IT thrust, the rising KSE graph, Forex reserves from petty $700 million to an all-time high $ 8 billion, lowering GDP from 53% to 47 %, record high remittance of overseas Pakistanis, controlling fiscal deficit, easing the pile of foreign debts, positive economic indicators by world financial institutions. The announcement of each of his achievement was punctuated with thunderous applause.

Go Musharraf!

Any person who was found to abrogate or attempt or conspire to abrogate or subvert the Constitution was to be treated guilty of high treason. That was the reason Zia could only survive with elimination of Z A Bhutto.. leagally Zia and all dictators were entitled to treason and death by Constitution of Pakistan!

  1. Every member of the Armed Forces shall make oath in the form set out in the Third Schedule Members Of The Armed Forces

[Article 244]

(In the name of Allah, the most Beneficent, the most Merciful.)
I, ____________, do solemnly swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance to Pakistan and uphold the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan which embodies the will of the people, that I will not engage myself in any political activities whatsoever and that I will honestly and faithfully serve Pakistan in the Pakistan Army (or Navy or Air Force) as required by and under the law.

May Allah Almighty help and guide me (A'meen).


Degas, are you telling me it is was Army who came into the politics of Pakistan? Was Iskandar Mirza also an Army man? Wasn’t Iskandar Mirza wanted Ayub to be his puppet after dissolving first assembly of Pakistan?

Here goes the Article 63 of the Constitution of Pakistan:

SOURCE

A constitutional expert in the national reconstruction bureau (NRB), when contacted, even admitted that the PPO 2002 could possibly be interpreted in a manner to bar a political party, headed by a person who is disqualified to be member of the parliament under Article 63 of the constitution, from contesting elections. The NRB expert, on condition of anonymity, said the PPO 2002 did not include any provision that visibly imposed a ban on political party headed by a person disqualified under Article 63 of the Constitution.

Two words for you Degas:

[list=1]

[li]Stop comparing Zia to Musharraf. Musharraf is cleaning the mess of Zia; and of BB and NS as well.
[/li]
[li]Open up a new thread, discuss and compare Benazir’s performance to Musharraf, with valuable and vaild sources.
[/li]
[/list=1]

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Boston-Karachi: *

Have you ever read the Article 62 of the Constitution of Pakistan?
[/QUOTE]

It's Article 63. :)

The post was how Musharaf is enhacing his rule with raping constitution as did Zia.. his changes are even more dangerous than Zia.. Hes trying to become God on earth.. and there should be an effort to stop his ever increasing power.. and its our right as a Pakistani nationals toi demand that.. in praise of Musharaf we might be damaging the very institution on which Pakistan was created.. let the praise of Imam Musharaf continue without interuption.. I wont comment again on ur ode to Musharaf!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Degas: *
The post was how Musharaf is enhacing his rule with raping constitution as did Zia.. his changes are even more dangerous than Zia.. Hes trying to become God on earth.. and there should be an effort to stop his ever increasing power.. and its our right as a Pakistani nationals toi demand that.. in praise of Musharaf we might be damaging the very institution on which Pakistan was created.. let the praise of Imam Musharaf continue without interuption.. I wont comment again on ur ode to Musharaf!
[/QUOTE]

Dude, there's a difference b/w them. Alot difference I must say!

Constitution? The same Constitution changes which brought this coup in power in 1999?

Don't comment on Musharraf Okay. Provide your valuable and valid sources of the performance of Benazir while she was in power. Will you?

PT, I have 2 questions for you. Do you agree or disagree that Mushrraf came to power by illegal means? Does constitution/rule of law means anything? If the answer is yes, than what right does Mushrraf have to rule 150 million people? Let us not forget what previous dictators have done. 2 (Ahoub and Yahah) managed to split the nation, and thirds mess is yet to be cleaned up.

Mushrraf is just another self-prasing dictator who is messing with constitution and in fact very existance of the nation.
As for as BB & NS are concerned, they were worse, sure, but there were elected by the people of the country. They came to power right way, by vote, unlike Mushrraf. This up coming elections, could go 1971s, when Awami league was denied the right to rule, despite winning the election, and we know what happen. Mushrraf is playing very dangrous game, and I hope Pakistanis will wake up and see that b4 it's too late.

Cheers

yeah he is dangerous person. seven years needed to turn pakistan to Turkey.. your musharraf is a sharabi kababi, and u call him a true muslim.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by reza khan: *
yeah he is dangerous person. seven years needed to turn pakistan to Turkey.. your musharraf is a sharabi kababi, and u call him a true muslim.
[/QUOTE]

My my. Never knew this would came from you, Reza.

If someone listens to me ...i'll give him 10 years :)

yes.. solitary with five of rigorous labor in the summer of jacobabad which he sold to the amreekees as one sells their abbay kee muj

What other option do we have, which of the 71 parties have made a real detailed plan public on how they will improve the country?

There was a post about it a while back and no one seems to know what any party's platform is, what their major plans are..

so who do you vote for?

Okay musharraf, bad, bad..very bad :) but who then? and why?