Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him in power

It seems that Mush is not going sooner, he will continue to work with the new government. No political party will dare to antagonize Mush’s ‘Leverage’ and jeopardize “Unprecedented Aid of $1 Billions per month” to Pakistan, which is the main reason of so called unprecedented growth.:smiley:
In stead of thinking emotionally, think logical and be rational, this is in the interest of Pakistan.

http://www.ericmargolis.com/

February 18, 2008
PAKISTAN’S MAKE OR BREAK ELECTION
Eric S. Margolis 2008

Pakistan’s national elections today are critically important for this strife-torn country’s future. They are almost as crucial for its western backers. Unless honestly conducted – and this seems highly unlikely - the vote will ignite further violence, plunging the highly strategic nation of 163 million into new dangers.

As of this posting, the turnout is disappointingly low, averaging less than 35%, caused by apathy, political fatigue, fears of attacks and the widespread belief that the elections will be manipulated by the government of President Pervez Mushattaf.

Only one thing is certain about today’s vote. If President Pervez Musharraf and his PML-Q party do well enough to retain power or head a coalition, the election was likely rigged.

Musharraf has rigged every vote since seizing power in a 1999 military coup. Polls show only 15-20% of Pakistanis support him. The majority backs the late Benazir Bhutto’s People’s Party, and former prime minister Nawaz Sharif’s Muslim League (PML-N). A coalition of Muslim parties, and cricket star Imran Khan’s PTI, may also garner some new voters, though Islamists have been trailing in the polls.

**However, Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power. In spite of Musharraf’s having muzzled the media, jailed thousands of opponents, purged the judiciary, and stuffed the electoral commission with henchmen, Washington, London and Ottawa still support his dictatorship and continue to hail him as a `democrat.’ **

While piously claiming to be waging war in Afghanistan to bring it democracy, the western powers have been encouraging and abetting dictatorship in Pakistan.

**The reason is clear: Musharraf has rented out much of his army and intelligence service to battle Taliban in Afghanistan and tribal militants at home. His fee: up to $1 billion monthly in secret and overt US payments. Without them, Musharraf wouldn’t last very long. **

Musharraf and his US and British patrons are hoping the opposition will split the vote and become deadlocked, leaving the former general as last man standing. The opposition, by contrast, is talking about ending the war against Taliban and reasserting Pakistan’s interests in Afghanistan and Kashmir – something Washington and London do not want to hear.

The powerful military still supports Musharraf, though for how long depends on the level of post-election violence. Gen. Ashfaq Kiyani, the new armed forces chief, was selected by Musharraf and Washington as a loyal anti-Islamist who would follow America’s lead. But this capable general remains an enigma. Indian intelligence sources say the US decided in early 2007 to ease the floundering Musharraf from power and make Gen. Kiyani Pakistan’s new strongman. One is reminded of Henry Kissinger’s cynical quip that the only thing more dangerous than being America’s enemy is being its ally. Musharraf’s usefulness to Washington is rapidly nearing its expiry date.

If Pakistan is rent by widespread protests and violence over brazen electoral fraud, or suffers political deadlock, the military may overthrow the widely detested Musharraf and seize power. Gen. Kiyani is said to be reluctant to see the military re-engage in politics, but there could be no alternative if veteran politicians Nawaz Sharif and Benazir Bhutto’s widower, Asif Ali Zardari, cannot produce a viable government.

The best outcome would be for the military to exile Musharraf and impose temporary martial law until the independent judiciary can be restored, the electoral commission made fair, media ungagged, and political repression ended. Then genuine, honest elections could be held and Pakistan returned to parliamentary government. But once the soldiers taste power again, they may be reluctant to give it up.

Until Pakistan gets a legitimate government representing its national interests, rather than those of the western powers, the country will remain in turmoil, and Pakistanis disgusted by the political process.
This, in turn, will pour fuel on the rising flames of anti-Americanism and extremism.
Pakistan is facing spreading civil war, and possible secession by two of its four provinces. The Pashtun tribal uprising ignited by the US/NATO occupation of Afghanistan is now spreading into Pakistan, risking a full-scale uprising by that nation’s 25 million Pashtuns. Any of these earthquakes could provoke an invasion by India, met by a nuclear riposte from Pakistan.

The war in Afghanistan and heavy-handed efforts by the US to bend Pakistan’s military regime to its will ignited much of the current turmoil. A majority of Pakistanis don’t want their soldiers to be western mercenaries, or their leaders to appear western yes-men. They support Taliban, and the struggle for Kashmir. But the US is so consumed by its war of revenge against Taliban over 9/11 – in which Taliban as not involved - it cannot see any of this.

Pakistan is the Muslim World’s most important nation and sole nuclear power. By treating Pakistan like a banana republic, arm-twisting Islamabad into battling its own people, and ignoring its own national interests, the US is playing with fire and damaging its own long-term strategic interests.

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

Yes it is in the interest of Pak that its leaders work together instead of picking up the fights. Off course the left and liberals like Margolis and the lier-laywers-pants-on-fire will never accept peace in Pakistan.

p.s. BTW US payments for defense support are $1 billion a year and not per month. It should not be called or treated as “Aid”.

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

LOL, rather wishful thinking for some.

The Americans can try to save their agent, but it is obvious he is on his way out, and will be dumped like Zia was

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

TheReadDeal,

You may be right. This may happen after US elections. Thumb rule is if Bush is here, Mush will also be there. Jehan Tum, Wohan Hum.:D

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

[quote]
His fee: up to $1 billion monthly in secret and overt US payments. Without them, Musharraf wouldn’t last very long.
[/quote]

Burqaposh,

I think this is in addition to $1 Billion aid per year. Anyway thanks for the correction. According to the reporter (well known in USA and Canada), it is $1 Billion per month payments. Pak government can deny this if it is incorrect.

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

Are you saying that PPP and PML (N), despite their rhetoric cannot remove the President? What will they tell their supporters that allegedly voted for them on their one point agenda of removing President Musharaf? :)

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

I do not understand what exactly the Americans want.

At one hand they have been one of the reasons Musharraf is weaker than his old days, they pushed him to remove uniform, they pushed him for elections and now they also want Zardari to work with him. What is their interest in a having a weaker Musharraf.

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

Total amount of money to Pakistan in the last 10 years is $12 billion. This reporter is leftie liberal and he can come up with made up "overt and covert" funds the way he wants. NYT, Washpost all are lefties and hate Pakistan's role in support war on terror.

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

I think a lot depends on whether the PPP-PML-N coalition are able to get a 2/3 majority in parliament. I expect a lot of defections from PML-Q to PML-N in the short-term and even if the MQM does not support them on this issue, the new government should be able to get a 2/3 majority in the NA. Whether they can get a two-thirds majority overall (Senate + NA) is debatable but not impossible by any means. Once Mush has been reduced to being a nominal President he might just go.

Re: Musharraf’s powerful friends are determined to keep him power

This make sense but getting 2/3rd will take some time. Till such time, Mush may continue to work as President.

Didn't get it. What do you mean by leftie? Is there any rightie too? What is the difference between them? According to your definition of leftie, Pakistanis are then lefties did not like Mush's war on terror. Am I right? And believe me there are millions in USA and Canada also do not like this war on terror.:D