Re: Musharraf admits to ISI's link with terrorists
^ lol...
Someone cannot wait for his next thread I guess with this analogy!
The title of the article and contents do not agree. Perfect example of propaganda and third class journalism.
To top it off, OP has no idea what he read, he just read the title of the article and got excited.
As mentioned in post # 8, the point was to highlight Mush’s doublespeak. But I couldnt expect you to either read before you post or comprehend that, could I ? 
To top it off, OP has no idea what he read, he just read the title of the article and got excited.
And you know that how ??
When you run out of arguements, its best to stay quiet rather than resorting to subterfuge and editing your posts after reading my subsequent posts to make yourself "look" more intelligent.
it is quite amazing. Foreign reporters can access and conduct interviews with terrorists inside Pakistan anytime. Pak officials can reach and collaborate with them on matters such as getting ambassador released.
But when it comes to actually catching them, all of them go "oh it is so difficult to find them in those treacherous mountains...we need 1000B more"
And you know that how ??
When you run out of arguements, its best to stay quiet rather than resorting to subterfuge and editing your posts after reading my subsequent posts to make yourself "look" more intelligent.
lol...
Which post did I edit allegedly AFTER reading your which post???? Read above, there is no answer you have which is not related to my above post. And I cannot edit you post **so why my so called edited post is **not in any of your posts?
Resorting to making up scenario aren't you?
Any real answer to the posts of mine?
If I look more intelligent then its your good perception and all I can say thank you. I did not try for that. :-)
Post # 21 edited at 8.57 am after my post # 22 at 8.56 am. And you know what I am talking about, so don’t feign ignorance 
Re: Musharraf admits to ISI’s link with terrorists
This is beyond amateurish, its farcical. The original interview can be found here. The out-of-context passages are in no way an admission of support or hints or hidden messages or informed consent or whatever this typical Indian rag is insinuating. Infact the headlineworthy item Spiegel found in the whole interview was that Musharraf thinks Obama is a good guy :hehe:
Here. Read this and get over the drama queeniness some media outlets are prone to.
SPIEGEL: Let us talk about the role of the ISI. A short time ago, US newspapers reported that ISI has systematically supported Taliban groups. Is that true?
Musharraf: Intelligence always has access to other networks – this is what Americans did with KGB, this is what ISI also does. You should understand that the army is on board to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida. I have always been against the Taliban. Don’t try to lecture us about how we should handle this tactically. I will give you an example: Siraj Haqqani …
SPIEGEL: … a powerful Taliban commander who is allegedly secretly allied with the ISI.
Musharraf: He is the man who has influence over Baitullah Mehsud, a dangerous terrorist, the fiercest commander in South Waziristan and the murderer of Benazir Bhutto as we know today. Mehsud kidnapped our ambassador in Kabul and our intelligence used Haqqani’s influence to get him released. Now, that does not mean that Haqqani is supported by us. The intelligence service is using certain enemies against other enemies. And it is better to tackle them one by one than making them all enemies.
Dude,** Post 22 is not even addressed to me.**
How and why would I edit my post AFTER seeing you post 22 addressed to Sheeda???
Any more of your fake arguments my dear? lol
Let me add more here:
Both posts 22 and 23 (much later at 9:26 AM) of yours are not edited, hope you know what it means.
It means you cannot come up with another fake argument that somehow you had to change your post after seeing my allegedly edited post. Got it???
‘Jhoot Ke Paoon Nahin Hote’ dear.
(Lies can only go so far!)
Let us see if OP knows how to read English.
This dude has serious problem of accusing others not to be able to comprehend English but suffers himself the lack of understanding simple English.
So far OP has not come up with any concrete answer to any posts against him including my post #17 which is in line with this post.
As Pakistan's president and as Chief of Armed Forces .... he would have been aware of the connection between ISI and Taliban .... that is why he is dropping hints here .......
As for India's role ..... nothing more then rhetoric ...... has there any shread of evidence shown to support this claim, even when he was leading Pakistan ?
As for Musharaf and his qualities .. will leave it for Pakistani's to worry about :D
Why has India built more consulates in Afghanistan, than any other country, including Pakistan and USA?
Re: Musharraf admits to ISI's link with terrorists
^ India is waiting and working hard to make Afghanistan its truly allied country after failing in its politics all around it.
**
A desperate measure by a lonely woman to find a man...**to please and fulfill her needs.