Musharraf admits to ISI's link with terrorists

[diwana]

@LockJaw

This is beyond amateurish, its farcical. The original interview can be found here. The out-of-context passages are in no way an admission of support or hints or hidden messages or informed consent or whatever this typical Indian rag is insinuating. Infact the headlineworthy item Spiegel found in the whole interview was that Musharraf thinks Obama is a good guy :hehe:

Here. Read this and get over the drama queeniness some media outlets are prone to.

SPIEGEL: Let us talk about the role of the ISI. A short time ago, US newspapers reported that ISI has systematically supported Taliban groups. Is that true?
Musharraf: Intelligence always has access to other networks – this is what Americans did with KGB, this is what ISI also does. You should understand that the army is on board to fight the Taliban and al-Qaida. I have always been against the Taliban. Don’t try to lecture us about how we should handle this tactically. I will give you an example: Siraj Haqqani …
SPIEGEL: … a powerful Taliban commander who is allegedly secretly allied with the ISI.
Musharraf: He is the man who has influence over Baitullah Mehsud, a dangerous terrorist, the fiercest commander in South Waziristan and the murderer of Benazir Bhutto as we know today. Mehsud kidnapped our ambassador in Kabul and our intelligence used Haqqani’s influence to get him released. Now, that does not mean that Haqqani is supported by us. The intelligence service is using certain enemies against other enemies. And it is better to tackle them one by one than making them all enemies.

Let us see if OP knows how to read English.

This dude has serious problem of accusing others not to be able to comprehend English but suffers himself the lack of understanding simple English.

So far OP has not come up with any concrete answer to any posts against him including my post #17 which is in line with this post.